Sheriffs Office Scandal.

Judged:

2

2

2

Yup wrote:

The fact is that ANYTHING coming out of that department is the SHERIFF'S RESPONSIBILITY, DIRECTLY.
Since taking office, he has done NOTHING BUT deny responsibility and blame others for his own INCOMPETENCE. Clearly here we see MORE OF THE SAME.
But hey... CLING to your nepotistic jobs. It's all you have and you will NEVER have others, not coming out of that mess.
And think of ME, when the feds come knocking at your door.

Judged:

4

3

2

watt wrote:

<quoted text>The fact is, the name did not come out of the department, therefore the Sheriff bears no responsibility for its release. There are other routes for the release of that name. As an intelligent person, you know that, but it appears you choose to ignore that fact in your pursuit of a personal agenda.
It also is interesting that once again, several posts that call you out, Yup, have been deleted. Are you once again, proclaiming one thing (abhorrence of censorship), while practicing it yourself?

Judged:

3

2

2

Wing Nut wrote:

<quoted text>
NOW, now MRS YUP, calm down, just because you have nothing intelligent to add, doesn't mean you should run to others to protect you. Try attacking some other way, ya know like one of your rants calling Republicans bad names. Maybe you can try more of that Obama Propaganda stuff, that's something you fall back on a lot..We have your number and your card could fail to be refilled, you might even have to get a job. Check with the DA or the Sheriff, they hired CHick,,, they may have a place for you.

Judged:

2

1

1

Yup wrote:

Reported for abuse of the forum and sanction requested.

Judged:

4

3

2

Yup wrote:

<quoted text>
Gee... I gotta wonder if Fake Yup here, with his MA location stamp, is picking up the Massachusetts Coke Trade where that Chateaugay couple left off.
Go get 'em, boys!
IF it doesn't cut into your dirty cop cut money too much, that is.

Judged:

2

1

1

Yup wrote:

Ok , sorry,, you're a coward,,