Texas couple awarded more than $13M in Internet defamation case

Apr 23, 2012 Full story: WFAA-TV Dallas 83

A Texas couple was awarded more than $13 million in a defamation case that raised questions about what people can say online.

Full Story
just curious

Euless, TX

#63 Jun 22, 2012
Wasn't the Lesher ranch ,Millwood Ranch, for sale back in 2007 or earlier???
But they said they were Forced to sell because of posts on topix.

In the Clarksville Paper and/or Texarkana paper,didn't Rhonda state that her salon bus. was "doing great and that all the talk and posts were not,in fact hurting her bus. because she had so many friends and the people in Clarksville gave her so much support".
Yet she claims now that she had to close her salon because of the posts on topix.
Just curious as to which is correct.
I am just asking a Question here....Not making factual statment.
Peace be with you all
pete

Clarksville, TX

#64 Jun 22, 2012
just curious wrote:
Wasn't the Lesher ranch ,Millwood Ranch, for sale back in 2007 or earlier???
But they said they were Forced to sell because of posts on topix.
In the Clarksville Paper and/or Texarkana paper,didn't Rhonda state that her salon bus. was "doing great and that all the talk and posts were not,in fact hurting her bus. because she had so many friends and the people in Clarksville gave her so much support".
Yet she claims now that she had to close her salon because of the posts on topix.
Just curious as to which is correct.
I am just asking a Question here....Not making factual statment.
Peace be with you all
her bus. was hurt by nasty mouth remarks here on topix slanderous remarks by nasty people
nwd

Rockwall, TX

#65 Jun 22, 2012
leshrstmpr wrote:
fck the leshers- way to tear down 1 amendment right peices of shit
i before DA
just curious

Euless, TX

#66 Jun 22, 2012
pete wrote:
<quoted text>her bus. was hurt by nasty mouth remarks here on topix slanderous remarks by nasty people
I see...I think...well why would see say the posts and talk was not hurting her bus.?? To the papers..
Do you know her and her husband.?
barbra

Clarksville, TX

#67 Jun 22, 2012
nwd wrote:
<quoted text>i before DA
its a slander case not a 1st amendment case
loula

United States

#68 Jun 25, 2012
The heading should read Mount Pleasant Couple awarded "NOTHING".. Case closed. Nothing to appeal.. This topic is so old and all of you need to move on - make a life for yourself..Rhonda stated in Clarksville newspaper she left with her head held HIGH. So I guess she wasn't so damaged, was she?! Now she can work full time with her husband , what she has wanted to do her whole life - work side by side//////////
brenda

Clarksville, TX

#69 Jun 26, 2012
loula wrote:
The heading should read Mount Pleasant Couple awarded "NOTHING".. Case closed. Nothing to appeal.. This topic is so old and all of you need to move on - make a life for yourself..Rhonda stated in Clarksville newspaper she left with her head held HIGH. So I guess she wasn't so damaged, was she?! Now she can work full time with her husband , what she has wanted to do her whole life - work side by side//////////
can you say appeal; over not you have a nice day. nasty mouths = nasty people good day
YEP

United States

#70 Jul 2, 2012
NOMO wrote:
What is there to appeal? They had no evidence, what part do you people not understand??????????
Has no one heard of the forgery case........ That is set to go to trial any time now.
LAND-TIMBER-DOCTOR. Maybe they will finally end up when they belong.
are you talking about James Naples vs Mark and Rhonda Lesher and Raymond Long in Bowie county texas for stealing Mr Naples timber and fogery theft by check? Look it up they just had a hearing.
lol

New York, NY

#71 Jul 3, 2012
wonderful topix!
hayseed

Clarksville, TX

#72 Jul 3, 2012
YEP wrote:
<quoted text> are you talking about James Naples vs Mark and Rhonda Lesher and Raymond Long in Bowie county texas for stealing Mr Naples timber and fogery theft by check? Look it up they just had a hearing.
naples is loosinrg
Idk

Fort Worth, TX

#74 Jul 3, 2012
wasn't the ppl that won the civil suit guilty of some kind of sex crime
nope

Clarksville, TX

#75 Jul 3, 2012
YEP wrote:
<quoted text> are you talking about James Naples vs Mark and Rhonda Lesher and Raymond Long in Bowie county texas for stealing Mr Naples timber and fogery theft by check? Look it up they just had a hearing.
nope its bs
nope the dope

United States

#77 Jul 4, 2012
not only are yall sickos but also "LIARS"!Guess the last post dont exist. "LOSersssssssssssss" !
hayseed

Clarksville, TX

#78 Jul 4, 2012
nope the dope wrote:
not only are yall sickos but also "LIARS"!Guess the last post dont exist. "LOSersssssssssssss" !
nope you r bs guess u dont exist either an ipn numbers dont tell who owns which computer an where they r at. then again my freind at nsa no's better.
chi

United States

#79 Jul 4, 2012
we are having dallas hot in chicago is week
wondering

Euless, TX

#81 Jul 16, 2012
Didn't the Judge in this case make a Final ruling in favor of the Defendants??
Yes, I do believe she did.
And ruled that the Plaintiffs are to pay all the defendants legal costs.
3531
ubit

Clarksville, TX

#82 Jul 16, 2012
wondering wrote:
Didn't the Judge in this case make a Final ruling in favor of the Defendants??
Yes, I do believe she did.
And ruled that the Plaintiffs are to pay all the defendants legal costs.
3531
back off your meds by 1/2 or double up one.appeal= no court cost dont turn them layers loose just yet an send them some more money
cindy

Clarksville, TX

#83 Jul 16, 2012
wondering wrote:
Didn't the Judge in this case make a Final ruling in favor of the Defendants??
Yes, I do believe she did.
And ruled that the Plaintiffs are to pay all the defendants legal costs.
3531
good read abovethelaw.com
wondering

Euless, TX

#84 Jul 17, 2012
cindy wrote:
<quoted text>good read abovethelaw.com
I think there has been NO appeal....just a motion for New trial.
To the same judge that ruled for the defendants to start with.
Where is that an appeal????
If one wants to appeal...one has ,only a certain amount of time ...I think.
This is only my humble opinion
brenda

Clarksville, TX

#85 Jul 17, 2012
wondering wrote:
<quoted text>
I think there has been NO appeal....just a motion for New trial.
To the same judge that ruled for the defendants to start with.
Where is that an appeal????
If one wants to appeal...one has ,only a certain amount of time ...I think.
This is only my humble opinion
sometimes its best to remain silent an be thought of as a fool has to speak up an remove all doubt

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Carrollton Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Greenbelt Body 37 min Cford814 3
Any new churches in the are since I been gone 1 hr Early riser 2
The new liberal America 1 hr Proud Tea Bagger 2
Mike Simons Promiseland off the air? (Dec '10) 2 hr Ed Donna 21
Merry Christmas to all 2 hr Ed Donna 1
Nonprofit contracting official indicted on brib... 6 hr Gary 2
Change A Letter Game (Nov '12) 8 hr mossy seaman 953

Carrollton News Video

Carrollton Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Carrollton People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Carrollton News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Carrollton

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 12:13 pm PST

Bleacher Report12:13PM
Could Romo Really Be NFL MVP?
Bleacher Report 1:31 PM
Allen (Knee) to Get MRI; Considered Day-to-Day
NBC Sports 3:34 PM
Texans still in playoff hunt - NBC Sports
Yahoo! Sports 4:01 PM
Murray impresses Cowboys playing with broken hand
Bleacher Report 4:21 PM
RG3's Performance as Important as Win in Week 17