The Left Is Becoming Deranged

from the ceo wrote:

<quoted text>
Are you a 12 year old?-"cut your testicles off and put them in your nose?" Typical response from another screaming, whining, sniveling, panty-wearing teabagger. Maybe you should take your do.uche baggery over to your Myspace page and hang out with all of your loser buddies.

LMAO @ my space page, im on topix that works for me, I will leave the myspace,panty hose and lipstick to you and your buddies. you better not sleep with the plastic bag on your head to tight, its showing your loss of brain cells...

fred wrote:

<quoted text>
Another riveting comment from a defective Obamabot.
As Ann Coulter has pointed out, a liberals most effective debating point is, "You're stupid.:

Well...truth hurts Adam's Apple and the rest of the right-wing dead wood.

Telstar wrote:

<quoted text>
Not going to be nearly so idealistic for the Obama disciples themselves when they start seeing their "weath" redistributed.

or when there US dollar wont buy nothing, and then will they see how Obama is creating all men equal..its not going to make a sh!t weather you have money or not, everyone is going to be on the same page... HUNGRY from no imports coming to America because of our US dollar not being worth printing let alone used as toilet paper.

And all you Obamanaughts are still proud of your POTUS? Now tell everyone your happy that our US dollar isnt worth anything, Our National debt is so high that the other Countrys are going to sell the treasury notes they bought years ago that will not be much when they exchange the US dollar to there money as when they bought the treasury notes.
Tell me how America is going to survive with no Imports, our US farmers are paid to not grow crops.
Amazing to me that the last depression there were 17 million in the US now 305 million people, my parents went throught the depression and went many days there whole family with no food. what will they/gov. do?

Peter Parker and Pharaohs wrote:

<quoted text>No, because there is more than enough firepower out there to protect hearth and home. Don't be a stupid F**K, and give me the excuse that .22 caliber handguns or perecussion rifles are the only things with any power out there to stop anybody.---You have no business anwering my post.---NEXT----

LOL...whatcha gonna do, Peter Puller and the Pharaohs, against an UZI or any other fully auto weapon? You gonna call Ghost Busters? Or perhaps dial 911 and wait for 15 - 20 minutes for the Popo to arrive? Naw....just call the County Coroner...they'll be showin up at your door...right on time.

Ronster23117 wrote:

<quoted text>
LOL...whatcha gonna do, Peter Puller and the Pharaohs, against an UZI or any other fully auto weapon? You gonna call Ghost Busters? Or perhaps dial 911 and wait for 15 - 20 minutes for the Popo to arrive? Naw....just call the County Coroner...they'll be showin up at your door...right on time.

As long as you Nazis don't come to power, I have nothing to worry about.----

ENOCH WALKS WITH GOD wrote:

<quoted text>
All I know is she stalks me from thread to thread.
She claims she's a Teacher but she's on Topix 24/7
No wonder kids can't read.

Well, insult her more and she'll ignore you, worked for me.

Obskeptic wrote:

<quoted text>
If you post something in disagreement with the great Peter, you are a Nazi, or just stupid, so I would recommend not responding to his childish taunts. Talking to a wall is more productive. As for machine guns, the founding fathers would have insisted that these weapons be available to any law abiding citizen. They new far better then we the nature of humans and how some only desire to control others with the time they have been blessed with on this planet. They were about freedom and liberty at ALL cost, including the scarifice of their own wealth and lives, as some of them willing gifted to their noble cause. Should it come down to some today making that same sacrifice, the question is would they be patriots or terrorist? The answer to that depends on who is doing the interpreting.

I wasn't even posting to him, when he butted in, once he did, I felt compelled to rebut his sillyness. Your assessment of the thinking behind the second amendment is dead on. The right to bear arms is to keep the government in check. They are the ones we need to be wary of. The price of liberty is eternal vigilance.

Peter Parker and Pharaohs wrote:

<quoted text>I, at least, qualified my Founding Fathers statement with the fact that I wouldn't suppose to know what they would say or do. But you actually "know" what they would do????----Your arrogance falls precipitously into stupidity

No qualifications needed, any educated person who is honest will tell you readily what the thinking behind the second amendment and the thinking behind it are crystal clear, a distrust for power[the government] and the ability to abuse it, at the expenses of the people. If you don't know that, you know nothing of our founding, or you choose to deny it, there can be no other option.

So, which is it? Ignorance or denial?

Peter Parker and Pharaohs wrote:

<quoted text>Yeah, my job. My job to debunk you right-wing crazies.---Man, sometimes it's more fun than my real job!!--hehe

I'd hardly call your response to my posting the truth a "debunking", more like unbridled vitriol to someone you disagree with. That vein on your forehead is really sticking out, calm down.:)

dont snow me wrote:

<quoted text>No qualifications needed, any educated person who is honest will tell you readily what the thinking behind the second amendment and the thinking behind it are crystal clear, a distrust for power[the government] and the ability to abuse it, at the expenses of the people. If you don't know that, you know nothing of our founding, or you choose to deny it, there can be no other option.
So, which is it? Ignorance or denial?

I believe it would be arrogance on your part to purport that you "know" what the Founding Fathers would say or believe. Any educated person should know that you are simply speculating. There is no denial, only an intelligent thought process in deciphering historical facts and events. Your thought process seems to wallow in paranoia and delusion

dont snow me wrote:

<quoted text>Well, insult her more and she'll ignore you, worked for me.

Nope!
that one has a stiffy for me.LOL...
I don't know what it is but she can't go a day without posting to me or about me.
I mean,A REAL STALKER.

dont snow me wrote:

<quoted text>I'd hardly call your response to my posting the truth a "debunking", more like unbridled vitriol to someone you disagree with. That vein on your forehead is really sticking out, calm down.:)

You have your "truth"---I have my "truth".---Maybe the real truth is somewhere in between.

Peter Parker and Pharaohs wrote:

<quoted text>I believe it would be arrogance on your part to purport that you "know" what the Founding Fathers would say or believe. Any educated person should know that you are simply speculating. There is no denial, only an intelligent thought process in deciphering historical facts and events. Your thought process seems to wallow in paranoia and delusion

mini me is a member of the Kenyan commie homosexual cult. Like his messiah, he hates America and hardly cares about the views of the founding fathers.

THE INTENT OF THE FOUNDERS ON THE 2ND AMENDMENT IS VERY CLEAR.....

* James Madison: Americans have "the advantage of being armed" -- unlike the citizens of other countries where "the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms."

* Patrick Henry: "The great objective is that every man be armed.... Everyone who is able may have a gun."

* George Mason: "To disarm the people [is] the best and most effectual way to enslave them."

* Samuel Adams: "The Constitution shall never be construed ... to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms."

* Alexander Hamilton: "The best we can hope for concerning the people at large is that they be properly armed."

* Richard Henry Lee: "To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them."


The chief reason America has remained a free country is the widespread private ownership of firearms. Individual ownership of guns made the American Revolution possible. The principal purpose of the Second Amendment was to maintain our freedom from government. It is an insult to our heritage to imply that the Founding Fathers wrote the Second Amendment just to protect deer hunters.

Tyrannical governments kill far more people than private criminals. The Nazis conducted a massive search-and-seizure operation in 1933 to disarm their political opponents, in 1938 to disarm the Jews, and when they occupied Europe in 1939-41 they proclaimed the death penalty for anyone who failed to surrender all guns within 24 hours.

The first line of safety has to be an ability to defend yourself. In some areas, a woman who is being stalked by her ex-husband must wait 10 days to buy a gun, even if her life has been threatened. Some cities criminalize carrying guns for self-defense but make exceptions for people carrying money or jewels. Are money and jewels more important to protect than people's lives?

History teaches us that registration leads to the confiscation of guns and that is the goal of many gun control advocates. Pete Shields, founder of Handgun Control Inc., told The New Yorker: "The first problem is to slow down the number of handguns being produced and sold in this country. The second problem is to get handguns registered. The final problem is to make possession of all handguns and all handgun ammunition -- except for the military, police, licensed security guards, licensed sporting clubs, and licensed gun collectors -- totally illegal."

The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution states: "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." Polls show that up to 80% of the public believe citizens have a constitutional right to own guns.

If the First Amendment read "A free press being necessary to the security of a free state, Congress shall make no law respecting ... the freedom of speech, or of the press," nobody would argue that free speech belongs only to newspapers. Likewise, they should not argue that the right to keep and bear arms belongs only to government agents.

Militias, when properly formed, are in fact the people themselves and include all men capable of bearing arms.[...] To preserve liberty it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them.

-- Senator Richard Henry Lee, 1788, on "militia" in the 2nd Amendment

"Firearms stand next in importance to the constitution itself. They are the American people's liberty teeth and keystone under independence … from the hour the Pilgrims landed to the present day, events, occurences and tendencies prove that to ensure peace security and happiness, the rifle and pistol are equally indispensable … the very atmosphere of firearms anywhere restrains evil interference — they deserve a place of honor with all that's good."
George Washington
First President of the United States

"The supposed quietude of a good man allures the ruffian; while on the other hand arms, like laws, discourage and keep the invader and plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as property. The same balance would be preserved were all the world destitute of arms, for all would be alike; but since some will not, others dare not lay them aside … Horrid mischief would ensue were the law-abiding deprived of the use of them."
Thomas Paine

"To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them."
Richard Henry Lee
American Statesman, 1788

"The great object is that every man be armed." and "Everyone who is able may have a gun."
Patrick Henry
American Patriot

"Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands?"
Patrick Henry
American Patriot

"Those who hammer their guns into plowshares will plow for those who do not."
Thomas Jefferson
Third President of the United States