Who do you support for Governor in Alabama in 2010?

lol

Do not support any candidate unless they can answer 2 questions:

1. What is the opposite of love?
2. What is a dollar?

Of course you will need to know the answer yourself and for your children sake:

The main thing about money is , it makes you do things you don't want to do.

www.driveinpeace.com/awareness.htm

If you can't teach your child what a dollar is then who can? Who has that responsibility to teach them? Who taught you what a dollar was? 99% of American can't correctly define a dollar!

(Credit: CBS) Amid continued controversy surrounding an Obama administration policy mandating that women working at religiously-affiliated institutions be provided with free access to contraceptive health care, a new CBS News/New York Times poll shows that most Americans - including Catholics - appear to support the rule.

According to a survey, conducted between Feb. 8-13, 61 percent of Americans support federally-mandated contraception coverage for religiously-affiliated employers; 31 percent oppose such coverage.

The number is similar among self-professed Catholics surveyed: 61 percent said they support the Obama administration's rule, while 32 percent oppose it.

Majorities of both men and women said they are in favor of the rule, though support among women is especially pronounced, with 66 percent supporting and 26 percent opposing it. Among men, 55 percent of men are in favor; 38 percent object.

The survey's margin of error is plus or minus three percentage points.

Poll: Obama holds edge over GOP hopefuls
Poll: Most GOP voters think long primary hurts nominee
Poll: Obama's ratings rise as economic outlook improves
Poll: Rick Santorum takes slight lead in GOP race

President Obama announced Friday that the government will not force religiously-affiliated institutions such as schools, charities and hospitals to directly provide birth control coverage as part of their employees' health care coverage, in the wake of an uproar from religious leaders over the administration's original language surrounding the regulation.

According to the tweaked rule, employees of religiously-affiliated institutions will have access to no-cost contraceptive coverage through the employee's health insurer, which will be required to offer the coverage for free. Organizations will not be required to refer women to the contraception coverage or subsidize it.

The rule in question has always exempted religious institutions, such as houses of worship, from providing their employees with mandated contraceptive coverage. CUT sentence, seems redundant to above

A number of voices on the right remain dissatisfied with the compromise. Leading U.S. Catholic bishops have vowed to fight the decision with legislative and court challenges; most congressional Republicans object to it as well.

Republicans frame the matter as an issue of religious liberty; Democrats counter that no person is being forced to exert her right to use birth control. Democrats also point out that 99 percent of women, and up to 98 percent of Catholic women, have used birth control at some point in their lives, according to two separate polls by the Guttmacher Institute.

Lucy wrote:

(Credit: CBS) Amid continued controversy surrounding an Obama administration policy mandating that women working at religiously-affiliated institutions be provided with free access to contraceptive health care, a new CBS News/New York Times poll shows that most Americans - including Catholics - appear to support the rule.
According to a survey, conducted between Feb. 8-13, 61 percent of Americans support federally-mandated contraception coverage for religiously-affiliated employers; 31 percent oppose such coverage.
The number is similar among self-professed Catholics surveyed: 61 percent said they support the Obama administration's rule, while 32 percent oppose it.
Majorities of both men and women said they are in favor of the rule, though support among women is especially pronounced, with 66 percent supporting and 26 percent opposing it. Among men, 55 percent of men are in favor; 38 percent object.
The survey's margin of error is plus or minus three percentage points.
Poll: Obama holds edge over GOP hopefuls
Poll: Most GOP voters think long primary hurts nominee
Poll: Obama's ratings rise as economic outlook improves
Poll: Rick Santorum takes slight lead in GOP race
President Obama announced Friday that the government will not force religiously-affiliated institutions such as schools, charities and hospitals to directly provide birth control coverage as part of their employees' health care coverage, in the wake of an uproar from religious leaders over the administration's original language surrounding the regulation.
According to the tweaked rule, employees of religiously-affiliated institutions will have access to no-cost contraceptive coverage through the employee's health insurer, which will be required to offer the coverage for free. Organizations will not be required to refer women to the contraception coverage or subsidize it.
The rule in question has always exempted religious institutions, such as houses of worship, from providing their employees with mandated contraceptive coverage. CUT sentence, seems redundant to above
A number of voices on the right remain dissatisfied with the compromise. Leading U.S. Catholic bishops have vowed to fight the decision with legislative and court challenges; most congressional Republicans object to it as well.
Republicans frame the matter as an issue of religious liberty; Democrats counter that no person is being forced to exert her right to use birth control. Democrats also point out that 99 percent of women, and up to 98 percent of Catholic women, have used birth control at some point in their lives, according to two separate polls by the Guttmacher Institute.

OK so what's your point? We all know Obamacare is a bunch of crap. It is just one more example of his socialist agenda. He is breaking our country one day at a time, one mandate at a time and one freedom at a tiME. HE HAS TO GO AND THE SOONER EVERYONE KNOWS IT, THE BETTER WE WILL ALL BE.

Curious wrote:

<quoted text>
OK so what's your point? We all know Obamacare is a bunch of crap. It is just one more example of his socialist agenda. He is breaking our country one day at a time, one mandate at a time and one freedom at a tiME. HE HAS TO GO AND THE SOONER EVERYONE KNOWS IT, THE BETTER WE WILL ALL BE.

july 2007 george signed a law to increse the national debt to 11.7 trillion gave away our poisition to buy cheeper drugs sold us out to the oil co.But you can`t blame poor old george cause dick (tator)carl and donald were realy in charge

Ike wrote:

<quoted text> july 2007 george signed a law to increse the national debt to 11.7 trillion gave away our poisition to buy cheeper drugs sold us out to the oil co.But you can`t blame poor old george cause dick (tator)carl and donald were realy in charge

LOL. Great post. How old are you 8?

I thought we had a new governor. Did I miss something. Did he quit..Friend me on facebook. I need a friend "Chuck Myrick"

Curious wrote:

<quoted text>LOL. Great post. How old are you 8?

old enough to know the gop dont want the white house. Look at the losers they keep sending out,knowing they have little chance of winning and if they did what would they do with it ? kinda like a dog chasing a car ,have you ever saw a dog drive? so what will they do? Don`t just name whats wrong with whats Obama is doing what will the gop do? NOTHING Ask our senaters how much of the oil thats refined in the US stays here how much will stay here if that new pipeline goes in? Its not for us its for the oil cos. to sale to other countries to make millions and for me to pay more for gas. Do a little research and you may like what we have

ike wrote:

<quoted text> old enough to know the gop dont want the white house. Look at the losers they keep sending out,knowing they have little chance of winning and if they did what would they do with it ? kinda like a dog chasing a car ,have you ever saw a dog drive? so what will they do? Don`t just name whats wrong with whats Obama is doing what will the gop do? NOTHING Ask our senaters how much of the oil thats refined in the US stays here how much will stay here if that new pipeline goes in? Its not for us its for the oil cos. to sale to other countries to make millions and for me to pay more for gas. Do a little research and you may like what we have

Your command of the English language is unbelievable. Grammar, spelling, sentence structure and everything else is nuts, an 8 year old could do better. No wonder your grasp of reality is so flawed.

Are The PEOPLE of Alabama Just IGNORANT? Being last in Everything,salary,education, ownership..because of Alabama is a republican state and its citizen are so stupid. to continue to vote Republican...

The Republicans Congress Continues to give BIG OIL MORE TAX CUTS as the Middle class disappears

Early Voting has started Go and vote for Democrats and kick Republicans out of Office..One is the same..In TN.

http://thinkprogress.org/romm/2012/02/18/4283...

House Passes Section of Transportation Bill Consisting Only of Earmarks to Big Oil

By Public Lands Team on Feb 18, 2012 at 10:57 am

In its latest transportation bill, the House of Representatives gave a big valentine gift to Big Oil

by Jessica Goad, cross-posted from ThinkProgress Green

This week, the House of Representatives passed part of the behemoth transportation bill it is considering over the next month on a 237-187 vote. This section consisted solely of earmarks to Big Oil including drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, opening Florida coasts to offshore drilling, a plan to develop oil shale (which isn’t even commercially viable), and building the Keystone XL pipeline. A Congressional Budget Office analysis shows that the drilling proposals together generate only approximately $2 billion, far less than the $50 billion funding gap needed for transportation projects over the coming years.

Even if the drilling could pay for the costs, linking oil and gas development to long-term highway funding is just bad public policy, as Ryan Alexander of the nonpartisan group Taxpayers for Common Sense has expla ined:

Paying for a couple of years of transportation funding with expected revenues from an increase in oil and gas drilling that will likely take many years to get rolling is not a responsible budget approach… It’s like buying the Ferrari tomorrow because you are sure a raise is coming sometime in the future.”

Originally the transportation bill (H.R. 7, American Energy and Infrastructure Jobs Act of 2 012) was one large bill that included transportation funding, drilling, and changes to federal pensions. However, Republicans realized that they would not have the votes for the bill, and so split it into three bills to be voted on separately that will then be spliced back together and sent to the Senate. This was an unusual procedural move designed to shield Republicans from having to take tough votes that won’t be popular with their constituents but also force the bill through.

What is most galling is that none of these bills alone or combined would be abl e to pay for the costs of transportation generated by this bill. Traditionally, improvements to roads, bridges, and public transportation are funded by the federal gasoline tax, but GOP leaders in the House are taking the unprecedented step to tie funding to an unnecessary and ineffective increase in fossil fuel production. Since it doesn’t even begin to fund our highways, the bill can be considered nothing more than a series of earmarks for Big Oil.

The proposal to fund oil shale from Congressman Doug Lamborn (R-CO) is a particularly nasty earmark. The Congressional Budget Office found the bill would generate no revenue over 10 years and in the short term would cost money to implement the leasing program. The Checks and Balance Project detailed this “boondoogle” in an online ad.

Last night’s vote saw some crossing of party lines, particularly 11 Florida Republicans angered by proposals to drill off of the state’s coasts who voted no on the bill’s passage.

Jessica Goad is Manager of Research and Outreach for the Center for American Progress Action Fund.

Angle Face wrote:

Are The PEOPLE of Alabama Just IGNORANT? Being last in Everything,salary,education, ownership..because of Alabama is a republican state and its citizen are so stupid. to continue to vote Republican...
The Republicans Congress Continues to give BIG OIL MORE TAX CUTS as the Middle class disappears
Early Voting has started Go and vote for Democrats and kick Republicans out of Office..One is the same..In TN.
http://thinkprogress.org/romm/2012/02/18/4283...
House Passes Section of Transportation Bill Consisting Only of Earmarks to Big Oil
By Public Lands Team on Feb 18, 2012 at 10:57 am
In its latest transportation bill, the House of Representatives gave a big valentine gift to Big Oil
by Jessica Goad, cross-posted from ThinkProgress Green
This week, the House of Representatives passed part of the behemoth transportation bill it is considering over the next month on a 237-187 vote. This section consisted solely of earmarks to Big Oil including drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, opening Florida coasts to offshore drilling, a plan to develop oil shale (which isn’t even commercially viable), and building the Keystone XL pipeline. A Congressional Budget Office analysis shows that the drilling proposals together generate only approximately $2 billion, far less than the $50 billion funding gap needed for transportation projects over the coming years.
Even if the drilling could pay for the costs, linking oil and gas development to long-term highway funding is just bad public policy, as Ryan Alexander of the nonpartisan group Taxpayers for Common Sense has expla ined:
Paying for a couple of years of transportation funding with expected revenues from an increase in oil and gas drilling that will likely take many years to get rolling is not a responsible budget approach… It’s like buying the Ferrari tomorrow because you are sure a raise is coming sometime in the future.”
Originally the transportation bill (H.R. 7, American Energy and Infrastructure Jobs Act of 2 012) was one large bill that included transportation funding, drilling, and changes to federal pensions. However, Republicans realized that they would not have the votes for the bill, and so split it into three bills to be voted on separately that will then be spliced back together and sent to the Senate. This was an unusual procedural move designed to shield Republicans from having to take tough votes that won’t be popular with their constituents but also force the bill through.
What is most galling is that none of these bills alone or combined would be abl e to pay for the costs of transportation generated by this bill. Traditionally, improvements to roads, bridges, and public transportation are funded by the federal gasoline tax, but GOP leaders in the House are taking the unprecedented step to tie funding to an unnecessary and ineffective increase in fossil fuel production. Since it doesn’t even begin to fund our highways, the bill can be considered nothing more than a series of earmarks for Big Oil.
The proposal to fund oil shale from Congressman Doug Lamborn (R-CO) is a particularly nasty earmark. The Congressional Budget Office found the bill would generate no revenue over 10 years and in the short term would cost money to implement the leasing program. The Checks and Balance Project detailed this “boondoogle” in an online ad.
Last night’s vote saw some crossing of party lines, particularly 11 Florida Republicans angered by proposals to drill off of the state’s coasts who voted no on the bill’s passage.
Jessica Goad is Manager of Research and Outreach for the Center for American Progress Action Fund.

Gosh, another goof ball who can cut and paste.

You took the time to learn to cut and paste, now take the time to learn how to speak/write the English language!'cuz your Tennessee/Dumocratic edumacation is showing.

Now go put some shoes on and head on over to the local school

Cowboy 67 you need to learn dumb ass republican ,why wasnt you in church today,?

When Republicans run a county or the Country this is what happens just as it almost did under bush...

2012
When a County Runs Off the Cliff
By MARY WILLIAMS WALSH
ONE county jail here is so crowded that some inmates sleep on the floor, while the other county jail, a few miles down the road, sits empty.

There is no money for the second one anymore.

The county roads here need paving, and the tax collector needs help.

There is no money for them, either.

There is no money for a lot of things around here, not since Jefferson County, population 658,000, went bankrupt last fall. There is no money for holiday D.U.I. checkpoints, litter patrols or overtime pay at the courthouse. None for crews to pull weeds or pick up road kill &#151; not even when, as happened recently, an unlucky cow was hit near the town of Wylam.

&#147;We don&#146;t do that any more,&#148; E. Wayne Sullivan, director of the roads and transportation department, said of such roadside cleanup.

This is life today in Jefferson County &#151; Bankrupt, U.S.A. For all the talk in Washington about taxes and deficits, here is a place where government finances, and government itself, have simply broken down. The county, which includes the city of Birmingham, is drowning under $4 billion in debt, the legacy of a big sewer project and corrupt financial dealings that sent 17 people to prison.

If you want to take a broad view, the trouble really began with the Constitutional Convention of the State of Alabama in 1901. The document that emerged there &#151; written to empower business interests and disenfranchise African-Americans and poor whites &#151; gives towns and counties little authority over local issues. Local taxing power rests with the state, though state lawmakers are loath to wield it today, in an age of anti-tax populism. Last summer, the Supreme Court of Alabama struck down a tax that was a crucial source of revenue for Jefferson County, finally pushing the county over the brink.

Officials here have only begun to grapple with the implications of life under Chapter 9 of the federal bankruptcy code, a municipal form of debt adjustment, rather than reorganization or liquidation. Until now, the most famous example was Orange County, Calif., which filed for Chapter 9 in 1994, after risky investments went horribly wrong. Many local governments are struggling to pay their bills these days, but hardly any have filed for bankruptcy. Notable exceptions include Harrisburg, the capital of Pennsylvania, Vallejo, Calif., and Central Falls, R.I.

&#147;This is really a journey without a road map,&#148; said John S. Young, the civil engineer who was appointed by an Alabama court to figure out how to fix Jefferson County&#146;s sewer system. Today he is that project&#146;s official receiver in name only: a federal bankruptcy court has suspended his powers, ruling that the federal bankruptcy law trumps state laws that protect bondholders.

Ordinary citizens can&#146;t do much at this point. Jefferson County has even canceled municipal elections scheduled for this August. It seems that there&#146;s no money for voting booths, either.

Not A Virgin wrote:

Cowboy 67 you need to learn dumb ass republican ,why wasnt you in church today,?

Hmmm, typical libitard. Same person but multiple personalities. Having problems remembering who you are today? Remember...The yellow pill is once a day, the pink twice a day, and the white pill is when you can't remember who you are. LMAO.

You are better off cutting and pasting the comics. You would look a lot smarter.

cowboy67 wrote:

<quoted text>
Hmmm, typical libitard. Same person but multiple personalities. Having problems remembering who you are today? Remember...The yellow pill is once a day, the pink twice a day, and the white pill is when you can't remember who you are. LMAO.
You are better off cutting and pasting the comics. You would look a lot smarter.

There aren't enough pills in the medicine cabinet to make any Lib smart or honest.

Chuckie the Driver wrote:

I thought we had a new governor. Did I miss something. Did he quit..Friend me on facebook. I need a friend "Chuck Myrick"

I know you

Curious wrote:

<quoted text>
There aren't enough pills in the medicine cabinet to make any Lib smart or honest.

How true. How true!!

really

Curious wrote:

<quoted text>
There aren't enough pills in the medicine cabinet to make any Lib smart or honest.

just like the rest of the gop Pilled up and talking through drugs led by the nose and don`t know which way to go what a shame you could have made a great night watchman

Chuckie the Driver wrote:

I thought we had a new governor. Did I miss something. Did he quit..Friend me on facebook. I need a friend "Chuck Myrick"

Face Book me, I need friends !

ike wrote:

<quoted text>just like the rest of the gop Pilled up and talking through drugs led by the nose and don`t know which way to go what a shame you could have made a great night watchman

ike, sometimes when you have something stupid to say, well, it is best just to keep it to yourself.

You are one dumb soundin' dude! LMAO