Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Judged:

7

7

6

Mona Lott wrote:

<quoted text>education bashing: what you do when you don't have one.

Judged:

8

8

7

Edgar wrote:

<quoted text>
Just because you take the time to tyupe out a long, unnecessarily extensive dissertation on who I'm not, doesn't make you sound smart.
In the end, you're still wrong.

Judged:

7

6

6

sociopathic Liberals wrote:

<quoted text>
Just the truth edgar!
But??? The truth? It has no liberal friends!
And NO edgar! I'm "Right". Not left!!! LMAO

Judged:

6

6

6

sociopathic Liberals wrote:

<quoted text>
I most certainly didn't waste my time on a worthless education like you liberals do! My BA is useful!!!
And you should be very thankful for that, because if it were not for people like me who WORK for a living! Your stupid socialism wouldn't work! Why??? Because I pay exorbitant taxes so that the dead beat cry baby liberals can have their worthless education paid for! And lets not forget about those liberals who believe that they should be paid by me / govt. just because they exist!!!

Judged:

6

5

5

Edgar wrote:

<quoted text>
I didn't say you were left.

Judged:

7

7

7

Edgar wrote:

<quoted text>
You're right. His intelligence is worthless. Yours is useful. He obviously has "stupid socialism".
Yep. Seems legit. Mhmm. Totally. Yea.

Judged:

6

6

5

sociopathic Liberals wrote:

<quoted text>
That was stupid!!! But Iguess you can expect no more from the childish liberal... LMFAO
Under the creed of modern liberalism, the individual citizen is not called to maturity but is instead invited to begin a second childhood.

Judged:

6

6

5

sociopathic Liberals wrote:

<quoted text>
That was stupid!!! But Iguess you can expect no more from the childish liberal... LMFAO

Judged:

6

6

5

Brian_G wrote:

<quoted text>Accidental pregnancy is a life experience for many traditional marriages.
.
<quoted text>Same sex couples never have accidental pregnancies, they can't have children without the opposite sex.
Keep marriage male/female because every gay was born of male/female.

Judged:

6

6

6

RnL2008 wrote:

<quoted text>
Again, not ALL heterosexuals want "ACCIDENTAL PREGNANCIES" that's why they take precautions......then you do happen to have those who CAN'T get pregnant NO MATTER HOW MUCH THEY TRY, but we aren't denying those couples the right to marry, are we?
Regardless of how a Same-Sex Couple may need to have children is NOT OPEN FOR DISCUSSION......Gays and Lesbians have the same right to privacy as heterosexuals do......AND IT'S NONE OF YOUR DAMN BUSINESS!!!

Judged:

6

5

5

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
In other words, gay unions are exactly the same as marriage, and all the things that are not are NONE OF YOUR DAMN BUSINESS!!!
Now I understand your 'reasoning'.

Judged:

6

6

6

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
In other words, gay unions are exactly the same as marriage, and all the things that are not are NONE OF YOUR DAMN BUSINESS!!!
Now I understand your 'reasoning'.

Judged:

6

6

6

The Great Sly_Clyde wrote:

<quoted text>No her sex life is none of your damn business, moron

Judged:

6

6

6

Prof Marvel wrote:

<quoted text>The whole point about choice is that all the things you define as homosexual are choice.

You tell us people born with the homosexual impulse want to have anal sex, marry same-sex, etc., but these things are all choice, not nature.

Indeed, heterosexual behavior is choice too.

You may have been born with the homosexual impulse, but you became homosexual out of choice. You could have chosen to live as a heterosexual as many do -- but you did not.

Thus the question is should government agree that what you define as homosexual is homosexual?

The answer is no, and the reason the answer is no is because once the government allows you to define who you are there'll be no end to it -- same sex marriage, gay adoption, transvestite school teachers, etc, is proof enough of that.

You are male or female, black or white, Catholic, Jewish, Protestant(etc) but NOT homosexual; at least in the eyes of the law.

That's YOUR definition and the government should have nothing to do with it -- the government should not concede to it.

In Boston you fellows are already demanding "gay rest rooms", gender neutral school curriculum, Homosexual Affirmative Action programs in Civil Service, etc.

Power corrupts and power has thoroughly corrupted you people.

Judged:

6

6

6

akpilot wrote:

<quoted text>It's completely funny how you can't seem to use facts in your posts.

BTW, which part of the Constitution gave the SCOTUS the right to interpret the Constitution? And when you are done with that, why don't you tell us where the SCOTUS gets the Constitutional right to review State law?

Judged:

7

7

7

Edgar wrote:

<quoted text>
Insanity = repeating the same action over and over expecting different results
You've posted that "creed of modern liberalism" sentence what, fifty times now? It still has yet to work.

Judged:

7

7

7

RnL2008 wrote:

<quoted text>
No, I truly don't believe you do.......and yes, Same-Sex Couples who are legally married are EXACTLY the same as any other legally married couple......THAT HAS ALWAYS BEEN MY REASONING.......the ability to procreate is truly irrelevant.

Judged:

6

6

6

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
"EXACTLY the same"
And then you list one of many differences.
That is the (lack of)'reasoning' I am talking about.
You emotionally scream for identification with marriage. Like a woman. Absent a man to legitimately balance that extreme emotion with reason.
Another difference between marriage and gay unions.