Buchanan hears from residents regarding chief

wHAT DO YOU EXPECT PEOPLE THAT WORK FOR THE CHIEF TO SAY. The two people that spoke up for the chief are not citizens of Buchanan.But who really cares any way.

Let's look at the four who spoke for him. Two were his cronies from Carrollton. One he created an unneeded administrator position for, one had his certification revoked for a couple of years after being run off from another department, and one washed out of another department's training program before he finished it. None were officers who were their when he became chief. That doesn't say much about him to me.

Well, we just narrowed down who the three stoogies are on here. irony, itdontmatterwhatyouthink and Rob are followers of Lambert and his cult cause it would be impossible to find these three plus the 6 in the paper who spoke for him that like him. After seeing the above post from Concerned citizen, I now understand why the three stoogies made the statements they did in the other thread. I'm interesting in hearing if the investigation has begun and by who or if they gonna sweep it under the rug. Hughes seems to be barking but not biting. My popcorn is getting old. I'm ready to watch this show

Guess Who wrote:

wHAT DO YOU EXPECT PEOPLE THAT WORK FOR THE CHIEF TO SAY. The two people that spoke up for the chief are not citizens of Buchanan.But who really cares any way.

Well, Guess Who since you are a citizen "I guess", I have learned that the ones doing the complaining do not live in the city of Buchanan either. So why are we listening to them when they never had a dog in the fight anyway. I was at the first meeting and I have to say that other than five or six people, the rest were family and friends to the what I call a "cry baby" and the other cry babies sat back while cry baby #1, made his comments. At least the officers who work at Buchanan would stand up and say their say while apparently "Cry Baby #1" threw himself to the wolves and the rest of the pack sat back looking at each other. I was waiting in intacipation for cry baby 1 to bring out proof that something happened and there never was one. All I could figure out is he wants everyone to think the chief and his officers have done something wrong and has nothing to back his comments. I don't know about yall but I call that a great case of an alligator mouth overloading a jaybird ___. Everybody in town around the library said someone came and told them to come to the meeting that night to see a show and so far, I have read archie comic books that have more show than that. I'm going back to sleep, wake me when there is a real issue that don't waste everybody's time.

Country man wrote:

Well, we just narrowed down who the three stoogies are on here. irony, itdontmatterwhatyouthink and Rob are followers of Lambert and his cult cause it would be impossible to find these three plus the 6 in the paper who spoke for him that like him. After seeing the above post from Concerned citizen, I now understand why the three stoogies made the statements they did in the other thread. I'm interesting in hearing if the investigation has begun and by who or if they gonna sweep it under the rug. Hughes seems to be barking but not biting. My popcorn is getting old. I'm ready to watch this show

You're so funny! Hey hoss guess you are going to find some official code on this too. Lmfao. I love stupid people so keep going.

Concerned Citizen wrote:

Let's look at the four who spoke for him. Two were his cronies from Carrollton. One he created an unneeded administrator position for, one had his certification revoked for a couple of years after being run off from another department, and one washed out of another department's training program before he finished it. None were officers who were their when he became chief. That doesn't say much about him to me.

Hey, I know the one your talking about with the certification issue, heres the big news there CC. His wasn't revoked but suspended. And guess what; his was returned without any conditions and. Since you want to throw the "three stooges" into a fire, don't make such comments without placing the the complainers background on the table. I know if you did this whole situation with the public support would be flushed to the sewage plant.

irony wrote:

<quoted text>
You're so funny! Hey hoss guess you are going to find some official code on this too. Lmfao. I love stupid people so keep going.

Nah, irony, no code on this one yet. I just want to ruffle your Lambert feathers. Sleep with dogs and you get fleas.

Well actual citizen please just go on to back to sleep and take irony with you and it something happens we will wake you up.

I see the heat is still on Lambert, as it should be.

country man wrote:

<quoted text>Nah, irony, no code on this one yet. I just want to ruffle your Lambert feathers. Sleep with dogs and you get fleas.

Oh you aint ruffled my feathers. and if your into sleeping with dogs, thats on you hommie. So keep on keeping on, it's your world.

MSO4 wrote:

I see the heat is still on Lambert, as it should be.

Not by you

Plus someone who cannot project a proper thought isnt much to be concerned about

country man wrote:

<quoted text>
Nah, irony, no code on this one yet. I just want to ruffle your Lambert feathers. Sleep with dogs and you get fleas.

hi B how are you

RebelYell wrote:

<quoted text>
Not by you

You dont know what heat is yet.

MSO4 is always running them droopy jaws when he dont have a clue.

streakolean wrote:

MSO4 is always running them droopy jaws when he dont have a clue.

Thing bring something to the debate instead of your sorry one liners.

MSO4 wrote:

<quoted text>Thing bring something to the debate instead of your sorry one liners.

You're asking a lot from his small brain.

Huntington Guy wrote:

<quoted text>You're asking a lot from his small brain.

Two gay men attacking me..help!

Vendetta 13 wrote:

<quoted text>Two gay men attacking me..help!

lol, classic sock FAIL!

http://youtu.be/3dWSDCjlaoc

Vendetta 13 wrote:

<quoted text>Two gay men attacking me..help!

Great, so you admit you are streak o lean. Thanks, now the folks on this forum can see what kind of loon they are dealing with.