Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Judged:

8

8

8

Wat the Tyler wrote:

<quoted text>
F*ck you bigot.

Judged:

8

8

8

polly sigh one oh one wrote:

<quoted text>
north carolina is falling for the brainwashing
of liberal satanism

Judged:

8

7

7

Wat the Tyler wrote:

<quoted text>
I live in Pennsylvania which is one of the few US states that doesn't have a discrimination against lgbt couples written in our Constitution like North Carolina.

Judged:

8

7

7

Wat the Tyler wrote:

America is far behind Canada when it comes to gay marriage. In 2005 every single state and territory in Canada legalized gay marriage. We are apposed to be land of the free yet we deny LGBT couples equal rights.

Judged:

6

6

6

Dugas wrote:

<quoted text>
It's about time the APA reversed it's like
about homosexuality not being a treatable
pathology that is responsive to therapy.
Listening to gays blather about each other
and making faux comparison with slaves is
no more than the inmates running the asylum.
The truth is that it is a pathology and it is
a pathology that responds to treatment.
I don't think we can help the gay 'chicken hawks'
otherwise known as 'Pedophiles'...they need to be
in jail which will be like a vacation for them.
The situation reminds me of nothing so much as a
bunch of drug addicts mumbling about it being their
'civil right' to smoke what they want to and put
needles in their arms and shoot up drugs.
The main difference is they do want to smoke something
but it isn't reefer,
..and they do want to get penetrated by something,
and it isn't a needle filled with junk.
Thank goodness the APA has finaly told the truth
about the treatable pathology known as 'homosexuality'.

Judged:

7

7

6

akpilot wrote:

<quoted text>
I hear ya, pretty much in the same boat. Either way we are screwed as I see it.
I do think Obama will end up with a second term, though it has less to do with people actually wanting him to and more to do with the fact the GOP can't nominate anyone worth a damn.
There isn't a dime's bit of difference between either one of them.

Judged:

7

7

7

Kirk Cameron wrote:

<quoted text>You see, since 1973 the gays had a stronghold over the APA, due to 5,000 APA members leave over political mumbo jumbo.
Two things happened, the APA got caught up in the gay pedophile normalcy and they almost lost their credentials when they published a moral affirmative statement about homosexuality in the DSM-IV. They were forced to revise it and now we have the DSM-IV-TR. The World Health Organization almost shut them down.
Gays have always held the APA up as Gods, but the WHO represents over 190 countries while the APA only partially represents the U.S.

Judged:

6

6

6

Kirk Cameron wrote:

<quoted text>Such anger, such hate, and such pathology..
The very reason that Obama will not win is because you think that he can overturn the state constitutions of 32 states, and suspend the 10th Amendment.
Obama has been smacked down three times by the High Court.
I think that you just want to screw gays, Christians don't want you.
Have you heard the good news, North Carolina has set in motion the banning of gay civil unions and independent sources say that a ripple effect will follow.

Judged:

6

6

6

Kirk Cameron wrote:

Now, you just stop, we know that you are the bigot.

Judged:

6

6

5

Kirk Cameron wrote:

<quoted text>Such anger, such hate, and such pathology..
The very reason that Obama will not win is because you think that he can overturn the state constitutions of 32 states, and suspend the 10th Amendment.
Obama has been smacked down three times by the High Court.
I think that you just want to screw gays, Christians don't want you.
Have you heard the good news, North Carolina has set in motion the banning of gay civil unions and independent sources say that a ripple effect will follow.

Judged:

6

6

5

Wat the Tyler wrote:

<quoted text>
I'm not the one denying people EQUAL RIGHTS and writing DISCRIMINATION into a state's CONSTITUTION.

Judged:

6

6

5

The Great Sly_Clyde wrote:

<quoted text>Bruno I found this picture.
http://www.google.com/imgres...
Awwwwww sweet

Judged:

5

5

5

Kirk Cameron wrote:

<quoted text>Did you see the beating that the gay community took from the APA?
APA revises 'gay gene' theory - admits it's not a psychological disorder
« on: May 14, 2009, 11:42:32 AM »
http://www.onenewsnow.com/Culture/Default.asp...
The attempt to prove that homosexuality is determined biologically has been dealt a knockout punch. An American Psychological Association publication includes an admission that there's no homosexual "gene" -- meaning it's not likely that homosexuals are born that way.
For decades, the APA has not considered homosexuality a psychological disorder, while other professionals in the field consider it to be a "gender-identity" problem. But the new statement, which appears in a brochure called "Answers to Your Questions for a Better Understanding of Sexual Orientation & Homosexuality," states the following:
"There is no consensus among scientists about the exact reasons that an individual develops a heterosexual, bisexual, gay or lesbian orientation. Although much research has examined the possible genetic, hormonal, developmental, social, and cultural influences on sexual orientation, no findings have emerged that permit scientists to conclude that sexual orientation is determined by any particular factor or factors. Many think that nature and nurture both play complex roles...."
That contrasts with the APA's statement in 1998: "There is considerable recent evidence to suggest that biology, including genetic or inborn hormonal factors, play a significant role in a person's sexuality."
Peter LaBarbera, who heads Americans for Truth About Homosexuality, believes the more recent statement is an important admission because it undermines a popular theory.
"People need to understand that the 'gay gene' theory has been one of the biggest propaganda boons of the homosexual movement over the last 10 [or] 15 years," he points out. "Studies show that if people think that people are born homosexual they're much less likely to resist the gay agenda."
Matt Barber with Liberty Counsel feels the pronouncement may have something to do with saving face. "Well, I think here the American Psychological Association is finally trying to restore some credibility that they've lost over the years by having become a clearly political organization as opposed to an objective, scientific organization," he states.(Hear audio report)
With the new information from the APA, Barber wonders if the organization will admit that homosexuals who want to change can change.
"It's irrefutable from a medical standpoint that people can leave the homosexual lifestyle," he argues. "Homosexuality is defined by behavior. Untold thousands of people have found freedom from that lifestyle through either reparative therapy or through -- frankly, most effectively -- a relationship with Jesus Christ."

Judged:

4

4

4

Kirk Cameron wrote:

<quoted text>So, you think that they have not, and is that your final answer? Are you sure? Do you want to phone a friend. Ding, wrong.
APA revises 'gay gene' theory - admits it's not a psychological disorder
« on: May 14, 2009, 11:42:32 AM »
http://www.onenewsnow.com/Culture/Default.asp...
LaBarbera stresses that even though elites will not recognize the change, that does not mean the change does not exist. In fact, both Barber and LaBarbera believe that God changes people through Christ -- regardless of the sin.

Judged:

2

2

2

Dugas wrote:

<quoted text>
I don't know why you put up with it at all.
I would move to Canda post haste.
When President Romney takes office DOMA
will be defended in court and DADT will
make a huge comeback.
It's just a treatable pathology but you
avoid admiting you are sick and need help.

Judged:

1

1

1

Prof Marvel wrote:

<quoted text>
Here's what's wrong: when you meatheads use data about lesbians to make claims about gay men. You try to get away with all the time. You do it with marriage data -- "Studies show lesbians make good parents; ergo, gay men will make good parents too."
Well, that's not science; that's stupidity.

Judged:

2

2

1

Prof Marvel wrote:

<quoted text>
And that's your source ...?
Look, Einstein, 99% of the adult males in Williamsburg, Satmar Hasidim community are married to women.
That's fact.
Do you know what fact is, fella, or must I explain that to you too?

Judged:

2

2

1

Here Is One wrote:

<quoted text>

That is why the entire gay community paid for the perverts that were exposing themselves to children here in Vallarta.....

Here Is One wrote:

<quoted text>
They gays supported this type of behavior

Here Is One wrote:

<quoted text>
so the blame when t to the whole gay community....

Here Is One wrote:

<quoted text>
My point was that if the gay community had stood up here (and now they do) and policed there selfs and when something like this happened they stood up and said it was wrong and that is not what the gay community was about then the focus of the new laws here would have been on the law breakers and not the whole gay community.......

Here Is One wrote:

<quoted text>
Now that the laws have swung in a way that the whole community is paying for the acts of a few the community is policing its self....
They have bought and paid for posters in both English and Spanish telling the gay community that the world is watching and how they act reflex on the community and if the community sees indecent behavior they will report it to the police...
Again we are not talking about some dimly lit club that one must be 21 to enter.......
This was down town in broad daylight on a very nice beach that families used...
Now is that to hard for you to understand?????