Entergy wants 4.6 million for legal fees

Pay the Bill VT wrote:

You think Shummy would have Entergy pay the bill if the judge favored VT? Absolutely.....it's the law. Now looky looky Entergy is looking to have VT pay up. It's about time VT pays Entergy for once. When is Dumlin and Sorrel going to smarten up and relize that enough is enough. Tax payers are going to be paying the price of their stupid sh!t...

The hypocrites like Pat Parenteau declaring it a "scorched-earth policy" and "in-your-face kind of move" were silent when VT was passing laws to penalize VY and attempt to have them pay for VT's legal fees.

Actually I think Parenteau was an advisor to the Shumlin before Act 160. He told Shumlin that the PSB would have no ability to deny a CPG and that was the motive for the charade that Shumlin conducted which resulted in the passage of Act 160.

What is funny is that someone said that the professors from VLS were even handed in their analysis of the case.

Oscar wrote:

Actually I think Parenteau was an advisor to the Shumlin before Act 160. He told Shumlin that the PSB would have no ability to deny a CPG and that was the motive for the charade that Shumlin conducted which resulted in the passage of Act 160.
What is funny is that someone said that the professors from VLS were even handed in their analysis of the case.

Analysis of the facts of case is different than their opinions about VY.

I think Hanna has provided the most even handed account of the case.

I Know More Than You wrote:

<quoted text>
Analysis of the facts of case is different than their opinions about VY.
I think Hanna has provided the most even handed account of the case.

Hanna threw in a pot shot at how private corporations were controlling government. That took here analysis out of being even handed and exposed her lefty agenda. It is clear that like NPR they put up a face of being unbiased but only for the purpose of gaining credibility for their real goal of slanting the report to the left. You shouldn't fall for such trickery.

Hanna was wrong in her analysis. Almost as wrong as Parenteau who is clearly lobbying Shumlin and Sorrel to appeal.

Oscar wrote:

Hanna threw in a pot shot at how private corporations were controlling government. That took here analysis out of being even handed and exposed her lefty agenda. It is clear that like NPR they put up a face of being unbiased but only for the purpose of gaining credibility for their real goal of slanting the report to the left. You shouldn't fall for such trickery.
Hanna was wrong in her analysis. Almost as wrong as Parenteau who is clearly lobbying Shumlin and Sorrel to appeal.

I'm not sure whether I should laugh or cry if that is your actual world view.

Oscar wrote:

<quoted text>
Not really. We just want Vermont to wake up to the fact that the tax rates hurt the middle class and the poor. Vermont has very very few rich people. And none are coming to bail us out with the taxes as high as they are. Vermont is not rich enough to solve every liberal fantasy about health care that is popular this week.
Would you choose to move to Vermont if you were a high income earner or would you choose to stay in NH?

A hateful no government anarchist...

I Know More Than You wrote:

<quoted text>
I'm not sure whether I should laugh or cry if that is your actual world view.

You should cry because it is my world view and I'm right. Which makes your world view totally bogus. How does it feel to have your liberal fantasies crash and burn before your eyes. How many years did you go to college and you are just now figuring out that you didn't learn anything?

I Know More Than You wrote:

<quoted text>
I'm not sure whether I should laugh or cry if that is your actual world view.

As I said before ...you only have one thing going for you and that is your support of VY. And even then you make all other VY supporters look bad with your angry atheist liberal dogma on other subjects.

Oscar wrote:

angry atheist liberal dogma on other subjects.

Keep em coming, you are a regular laugh riot.

I bet you are a self made man who pulled himself up by his bootstraps!

LMAO

I Know More Than You wrote:

<quoted text>
Keep em coming, you are a regular laugh riot.
I bet you are a self made man who pulled himself up by his bootstraps!
LMAO

And you are a natural born coward who gets his rocks off by saying things on the internet you are afraid of saying to people face to face. Internet coward.

Subsidies--Entergy gets PLENTY of free $$ Reformer.com/localeditorials/ci_17798584
and yet they bitch about wanting to be reimbursed for their cost of having to defend against the suit which was rightfully brought against them?!

Link doesn't work.

Mike Mulligan wrote:

Link doesn't work.

neither do ewe ya bum

Oscar wrote:

And you are a natural born coward who gets his rocks off by saying things on the internet you are afraid of saying to people face to face. Internet coward.

So being a coward is not a choice? What about being gay?

I'm still looking to pour you a nice hot cup of STFU if you ever head up north!

Alex wrote:

Subsidies--Entergy gets PLENTY of free $$ Reformer.com/localeditorials/ci_17798584
and yet they bitch about wanting to be reimbursed for their cost of having to defend against the suit which was rightfully brought against them?!

Number one, they sued the state, notthe other way around. Two, the share holders could sue VY if they didn't seek reimbursement. The link works, its just to an old article..

I Know More Than You wrote:

<quoted text>
So being a coward is not a choice? What about being gay?
I'm still looking to pour you a nice hot cup of STFU if you ever head up north!

In your case you don't have a choice. You are an internet coward and don't have the intellect to be anything else.

Why would anyone want to change if they were born gay? Someone who was born a coward like you should want to change. To bad you can't.

I love how you and Northstardust keep trying to tell people to shut up on an internet site. Very funny. Also indicative of a low intellect that can't think of anything more clever to say.

Alex wrote:

<quoted text>
neither do ewe ya bum

I am available for work almost immediately and anywhere!

Entergy can eat shtt- Shum should tell em that and that they should take that 4.6 million out of the $MEGA-MONEY$ they get thanks to the damn feds

The nuclear industry has been heavily subsidized throughout its 50+-year history in the U.S. It continues to seek the lion's share of federal funding since it cannot otherwise afford to expand.

The nuclear industry has been heavily subsidized throughout its 50+-year history in the U.S. It continues to seek the lion's share of federal funding since it cannot otherwise afford to expand.
Beyondnuclear . org/nuclear-subsidies/
^also there:'What is really behind the "witch hunt" targeted at NRC Chairman Jaczko?'

don't forget tax incentives & credits for producers and investors

Fact: the BILLION$ in costs due to a catastrophic accident would mostly have to be paid for by the taxpayers (yes- Nukedom is run by lying, cheatin, danger-downplayin, cover-upin thugs, basically corporate welfare queens and taxcheats!!-and Nukers get a pass on having to be responsible for the High costs of living their Nuketopian dream, at the risk of us all)

Nuclear Subsidies:$7.1 billion a year (that was in the mid-1990's) from the book 'Take the Rich Off Welfare'
Thirdworldtraveler . com/Corporate_Welfare/Nuclear_ Subsidies.html

'Japan lessons to be learned'
Reformer . com/localeditorials/ci_1779858 4
^"Safe nuclear reactors are just around the corner and over the technological horizon, and always will be.
No new nuclear plants will be built without massive government subsidies and guarantees because private capital and the "free market" will not fund them.
These plants are 50-year-old science with computers and electronics grafted on. They have incredibly complicated and interrelated systems that work within their design parameters -- as long as everything actually works.

Any combination of human error, Murphy's Law, Rumsfeld's "unknown unknowns" and an aging infrastructure can compound and cascade a reactor out of control. Anti-nukers have long predicted a disaster like this. Anti-nukers are anti-nuke because such disasters are predictable and inevitable. There will be more of them, whether "caused" by natural disasters, human error, or both.