Drunken party girl or a victim herself?

I have only read the article posted here. It is clear to me, that the court was against her from the beginning. If there was a blood alcohol done (which normally they are done if there is an odor of alcohol on the victim)it is bull that a second blood alcohol was done. Sorry, I do not believe that. I don't know about GHB, but there are few things that clear your system in six hours, usually drugs do not clear that soon.

She is disabled and has suffered intensely for something she did not intend to do. My god, if the Browns were such devout Christians it looks like they would forgive and get on with their christian lives.

She was railroaded.

I don't have words to describe how horrifying it is to realize that a justice system can be used for carrying out personal vindictive retaliation.
The real perpetrator needs to be caught and put behind bars.
There are some of us who are trying very hard to see that real justice does get served in Emily's case:
http://www.emilydowdy.com

Yes, she was railroaded.

IF THEY THOUGHT SHE WAS DRUNK ,WHY DID THEY NOT TEST HER BLOOD AT THE SITE OR THE HOSPITAL. IT WOULD HAVE SAVED ALL THE COST AND HURT AND MIGHT HAVE GOTTON THE ONE BEHIND THE ACCIDDENT. BUT LIKE MUCH OF WHAT HAS BEEN GOING ON THINGS ARE NOT DONE IN THE MAME OF STAYING UNDER BUDGET. AND IN COURT THEY ARE ALLOWED TO BEND THE LAWS TO FIT THEIR OWN THEORY,S AND TO PUT OUT STUFF AS TRUE FACT THAT HAS NOT BEEN PROOVED, SUCH AS THE HOT DOG IN BUN BEING PASSED OF AS A BEER . AND A COURT ALLOWS LAWYERS TO DEPATE IF THE LADY WEARS PANIES UNDER HER CLOTHS TO DECIDE GUILT OR NOT GUILTY. IT SEEMS A CONVICTION RATE IS MORE IMPORATANT THAN CATCHING THE BAD GUY. A RECENT JUDGE IN ANOTHER CASE STATED THAT ONES WHO WORK FOR THE PUBLIC SHOULD BE HELDED TO HIGHER STANDARDS . I HAVE TO AGREE WITH THIS STATEMENT. I THINK THEY SHOULD INCLUDING DA,S LAWYERS AND JUDGES WHO ALLOW THIS TO HAPPEN IN A COURT OF LAW. DEBATING OVER WHAT SHE WORE UNDER HER CLOTHS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE FACTS OF THE CASE. AND HOW MANY LAWYERS DA,S JUDGES HAVE A BEER AT A FAMILY GATHERING NOT A WILD PARTY AND THE QUESTION OF WHY HER BLOOD WAS NOT CHECKED AT THE SITE OR THE HOSPITAL
This is the first time I or anyone else in my family has seen this site so allow us to respond. Emily's blood was tested twice - once at the scene and once at the hospital. Both times well over the legal limit. The first, which we were not allowed to admit was twice the legal limit. She was drunk. After all the testimony heard that is all there was to it. The jury could not find ANY reason even after they were allowed to try this theory that they came up and tell the jury all kinds of amazing things they tried to get them to think might have happened. The evidence showed once again after sitting through this horribly painful ordeal that she was GUILTY - the jury had no doubts and neither would you if you heard the whole story. Thanks and when you read newspaper articles always remember as we have found out the painful way by having to listen to every new thing they come up with there are two sides to every story and almost every story is slanted - usually to the left.

Ice Tea wrote:

I have only read the article posted here. It is clear to me, that the court was against her from the beginning. If there was a blood alcohol done (which normally they are done if there is an odor of alcohol on the victim)it is bull that a second blood alcohol was done. Sorry, I do not believe that. I don't know about GHB, but there are few things that clear your system in six hours, usually drugs do not clear that soon.
She is disabled and has suffered intensely for something she did not intend to do. My god, if the Browns were such devout Christians it looks like they would forgive and get on with their christian lives.
She was railroaded.

I am the family of Ryan Brewer - you are so misinformed. Do you always believe everything you hear from the papers. Do you really think that twice 12 jurers heard her pathetic theory and just decided to put her behind bars. I was in every single painful horrible day of trial and we did listen to see if Emily could have any possibility of being a victim but she was not. She was DRUNK. As both of her BAC test shown. The first was taken at the crime because it was obvious she was drunk. The second was taken by the OHP when she was served a warrent in the hopsital for her arrest. The first was unable to be used because it was taken by just mer ambulance people - it was twice the legal limit and the second one was well over the legal limit even though it was hours later. PS - at the time she was given the GHB tests she claims to have been still under the influence of GHB becuase she was hving symptoms still. As experts testified - if she were still having symptoms it would have shown up. Also - if you had just heard all the amazingly unbelievable things they tried to get the jury to believe you would have been appauled as was the jury - both times - that and her lack of remorse on the stand and by drinking and partying afterwards - even when she was under bond restrictions not to drink or drive are what got her 40 years. It had nothing to do with Oklahoma. Please remember when you read an article that it is just one person's view of what happened. One person who has been told by her family and was not even present during all of the proceedings over the past seven years. Why don't you think about our family - the person who was killed is having to return to court because this girls - who in front of a jury admitted and was not remorseful is continuing to do what she has done her entire life it seems and just look out for herself. If she would have seen what she did wrong and admitted it no court would have given her time. They were appauled by her overwhelving evidence of guilt including her poor friends who had to get up and tell about her calling the death of my nephew an "unfortunate incident that she was involved in and taking it lightly. There is SO MUCH MORE TO THE STORY. Please don't put down our Christian family. You are welcome to check our Ryan's web site. Just google for Our Son and Ryan Brewer.

jrbuffalo wrote:

I don't have words to describe how horrifying it is to realize that a justice system can be used for carrying out personal vindictive retaliation.
The real perpetrator needs to be caught and put behind bars.
There are some of us who are trying very hard to see that real justice does get served in Emily's case:
http://www.emilydowdy.com
Yes, she was railroaded.

I was at every single day in court for Emily. No person writing any article you have read was. The jury was and our families were. Emily was not in any way Railroaded. She was however DRUNK as shown by both BAC levels., the first being twice the legal limit. If you had sat through every day of the trials you would have seen how appauled the jury was by emily's lack of remorse and apparent disregard for Ryan's life due to the fact that she broke her bond and drank and drove while out on bond. Her poor friends had to get on the stand and testify to these things. Please do not believe the one side of this story that her family is telling. It is sad that their daughter is in jail but they have never held her responsible and she has never admiited to being when it is so apparent. IT was apparent to both juries even after her attorney was allowed to bring in every possible theory and try to convince the jury. They were just amazed at the nerve of her to try to refute the obvious. Please - think before you speak out for a drunk driver. Thanks

Malts and Burgers wrote:

It seems rather convenient that she doesn't remember anything. There are three possibilities: 1) She lied 2) Three drinks made her drunk enough to black out (unlikely, she sounds like a seasoned pro) or 3) She truly was drugged. In my opinion by the little research that I have done, I believe she is guilty yet the punishment seems to be a little harsh.

I appreciate you actually thinking about this. There is sooo much more to the story. SHe was indeed twice the legal limit. It did not come out for quite a while that she thought she might have been attacked. But, at the hospital her BAC was well over the legal limit too. She had a cath put in, no sign of being attacked was testified to by the nurse. I could go on and on but we have been having to just defend her guilt for so long that is is hard to keep listening to this. I just appreciate that you were so insightful to think there are two sides to the story. It amazes me that people don't actually think about what they are trying to say happened. Even if you had not heard every day of trial as I did - I find it hard to believe anyone could believe that she went out to a bar, disappeared with someone, they attacked her and handed her keys back and put her in her car to drive home. That may sound like a stretch - but you just should have heard what else they tried to say. The jury gave her 25 years the first time because they were appauled that she would think they were that stupid and the second time after they heard her full theory they were even more appauled at that plus her lack of remorse on the stand and in her actions - which you would just have to know about from court. ANyway. Thanks Sorry this is so long but it is May - Ryans birth month and the anniversary he was killed. And we are having to wait to see if we will have to spend another week of horrible pain listening to another trial to try to see what story she has now.

Malts and Burgers wrote:

Will anyone ever know for 100% if she was drugged, since there was no blood test done? I bet the prosecutions is elated on that one.
My heart goes out to both families as well.
Is there any information on the people that could have possibly been drugging people that night?

PS - she was tested. BAC twice was well over the legal limit. GHB was normal even though at the time she was tested she says she cannot remember anything (that's because she was drunk!!)

Also they are saying there were other people who this has happened to but we just heard two of them's story and it was soo not the same. They went willingly with someone from this bar that they knew and "think" something funny happened to them. Oh and by the way - they happen to be female defense attorneys - hows that for interesting

for giving husband wrote:

no iam not crazy iam just a ware of the garbage that goes on every day in certain curts that the judges let take place with soime das and lawyers. this is not the only case in question there have been reports in the news just to day of 2 ladys getting raped by date rape drugs. i can,t help but wonder if the one behind this has figured he got away with it and has also involved others to try. in a setting where there has been doubt in other case such as if the glove don,t fit and the case was dis-missed i don,t under stand how this case would not have been. all the evidence in the case don,t add up her blood alcl. level its been said to be 2.0 if that was the case and she was a party gal than she would have been more use to it and would not have blacked out. the other point is the picture that was put forth of her holding a beer which turned out to be a hot dog in bun. if it had been a beer that was one picture not a group of them and it was at a family gathering not a party. ive read no where they had statements from others placing her at different party,s. the very fact that she was not wearing panities at the time of the acciddent and bleeding sugeest there might have been rape. in the recent news about the 2 ladys that were raped one remembers clearly the other don,t

I was in court every day. You know nothing!! IT was testified as to if she had signs of rape. GUESS WHAT? She did not!!! Ask yourself, would some guy really attack a girl and take her somewhere to rape her but then give her keys to her own car and send her on her way??

INTERESTED wrote:

THEREE ARE TOO MANY THINGS THAT DON,T ADD UP HERE
THE FACT SHE WAS SUPPOSE TO BE A PARTY GIRL BUT PASSED OUT AT A LEVEL OF 2.0
THE FACT THE PICTURE TRYING TO PROVE SHE WAS A PARTY GIRL WAS OF A HOT DOG AND BUN AT A FAMILY GATHERING.
STATEMENTS FROM 2 OTHER LADYS COMING FORWARD THAT THEY HAD BEEN DRUGED AT THE SAME BAR IN THE SAME TIME FRAME
I UNDERSTAND YOUR FEELING FOR THE LOST BOY I DO BUT THE WAY THEY WENT AFTER HER TO DECIDE GUILT OR NOT GUILTY IS A CRIME AS WELL LOOK AT OTHER CASE SUCH AS IF THE GLOVE DON,T FIT THERE WAS LOT LESS QUESTIONS IN THAT CASE ALONE AND THATS JUST ONE OF SEVERAL.
THAT CASE WAS DIS MISSED.
AND I DON,T MEAN FOR YOU TO FEEL THAT ANY ONE IS TRYING TO UNDER MINE THE PAIN YOUR GOING THROUGH . THE ISSUE HERE IS THE COURT SYSTEM AND THE WAY THEY ALLOW CASES TO BE TRIED. IN THIS COUNRTY A PERSON ALL PEOPLE HAVE RIGHTS. THEY WERE ALLOW TO DIS REGUARD EVIDENCE AND OUT OUT EVIDANCE SUCH AS THE PICTURE IN THE BUN AND TRY TO DEGRADE HER CHARACTER IN COURT THATS NOT WHAT I=A TRAIL IS FOR. ITS TO HAVE A BODY OF YOUR PEERS TO HEAR ALL THE EVIDENCE AND DECIDE . AGAIN IAM TRULY SORRY FOR THE LOST OF YOUR LOVED ONE HE IS ALSO A VICTIM. IF YOU HAVE READ THE LATERST NEW THERE ARE OTHER LADY,S THAT HAVE HAD THE SAME THING HAPPEN ONE REMEMBERS ONE DON,T. THE FACT THAT SHE WAS NOT WEARING PANITIES AT THE TIME OF THE ACCIDENT AND BLEEDING INDICATES THAT SOME THING HAPPENED. AS FAR AS NOT SHOWING REMORSE THERE HAVE BEEN OTHER CASE WERE PEOPLY HAVE BEEN IN SHOCK FOR VERY LONG PERIODS OF TIME.

It is obvious that you have been informed by only Emily's family and have not read the court transcripts. If there was anything unfair about the trial it was the way that they were allowed to ramble on WITHOUT any evidence. Emily didn't wear panty to not show a panty line probably. Big deal. The nurse who inserted her catheter stated that there was NO blood, no evidence of trauma. Her status of being a party girl came from testimony that she like to go out and drink and dance a couple of times a week, not that she was an alchololic. A specialist testified for both sides how her body would handle alcohol. Do you think we spend a whole week of testimony just rambling. They fought tooth and nail to try to find something to even sort of make it look like what it wasn't but it just wasn't there. NO EVIDENCE or FACTS. Our family got to sit through another painful week of an evidentuary hearing to hear those two ladies you so confidently say were attacked in a similar manner at a similar time. After hearing there testimony is was VERY clear why her attorney did not use them as witnesses. Three girls went to this same bar with three guys that they had met at the guys house before going to the bar. They sat with these guys. One girl left because she said the other girls were getting too drunk. The last two girls went home with two of the guys and basically feeling like they "might" have been given something by these guys (that they went home with ) and did things they regretted. However, they did not feel like anything that happened to them was not consentual. And then following this night, they showered at the guys house and let him drive them to their home. Do you really think they were raped by someone and then let him take them home. Oh, and one of them had her purse stolen and called to talk to a female police officer to report that but there was no report of any rape or anything else funny going on. These women are defense attorneys though who know emily's attorney and have even worked with him at times. Wonder what made them come forward??? Think add up to one FACT when you have heard the whole story and that is EMILY DOWDY drank until she was drunk and drove her car 70 miles an hour the wrong way on I40 and killed my nephew. END OF CASE!

So you would like Emily released back out into society. Why, so she can drink and drive and kill again? You must be very young child to be so gullable as to believe only what Emily and her lawyers have to say. So you do not believe there was a second blood test. Well I guess you believe that the earth is flat. The Brewers I know have forgiven Emily. They also, realize if they help put her back on the streets they will be enablers. They will have enabled her to drink, drive and kill again. There are is a good percentage of drivers who kill the second and third time and even more. You are sooo, sooo uninformed and I am so silly for trying to show you the truth. I read somewhere that you are not to give your bread to the dogs or cast you pearls before swine. So I will not answer you until you have become informed on the case. You might want to go to http://www.geocites.com/Heartland/Creek/8760 [QUOTE SLEEP WELL. GRANDPAW BREWER
who="Ice Tea"]I have only read the article posted here. It is clear to me, that the court was against her from the beginning. If there was a blood alcohol done (which normally they are done if there is an odor of alcohol on the victim)it is bull that a second blood alcohol was done. Sorry, I do not believe that. I don't know about GHB, but there are few things that clear your system in six hours, usually drugs do not clear that soon.
She is disabled and has suffered intensely for something she did not intend to do. My god, if the Browns were such devout Christians it looks like they would forgive and get on with their christian lives.
She was railroaded.[/QUOTE]

Well Mr. Buffalo what experience have you had with the courts that makes you an expert? You do not know what horrifying is until someone comes to your door and tell you some irresponsible, and selfcentered drunk ran over you grandson and killed him! I have personal knowledge of the courts being used more than once to settle civil matters. You cannot be anymore outraged than I have been about this matter. If this were the case with Emily I would personally report it to the Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma and the newspapers in this area. There were usually a dozen or so of Ryan's relatives in court each and every day. Whether you believe it or not if Emily's lawyers could prove that Emily was given a date rape drug we would be the first to want her set free. I have sat through ever day of her trials. The defense has no defense!!! This was not the first time Emily had been out on the town! Emily went to drink, she was driving a car, so, she got drunk, got behind the wheel of her car and drove it while in a drunken stuper until she hit something. That is all the evidence supports!!! His head and torso was mangled beyond belief. He, nor anyone else deserves to die in such a horrable manner. Ryan, was a kind and caring person. His last two weeks of his life were spent helping tornado victums in Oklahoma City. We do not want Emily to receive justice. If Emily were to receive the justice that the evidence supports she would be executed!!! No one want that!!! The perpetrator has been caught and is behind bars. The defense has rambled on and on about GHB, yet everytime their so called expert witnesses get on the stand they futher bolster the States case. In the 2nd trial where Emily got 25 years, The State, called Emily's expert witnesss to the stand. He was the last person to testify for the state. Connie, the prosecutor ask Mr. Wimbesh (the defenses hired gun) to read from the medical report of the hospital where Emily was taken. After he read what she ask him to read, Connies ask him, "Was Emily Dowdy drunk when she ran into Ryan Brewer and killed him?" His reply was, "yes she was drunk when she ran into Ryan Brewer and killed him." jr you sure have been buffaloed by Emily and her family. I feel certian that even more damaging evidence against Emily will surface if there is another trial. Next time she could get life. If there is another trial I'll bet they do not bring up the "hotdog" picture taken at a tailgate party, because if they do it could let in more testamony about Emily's drinking and driving while out on bond. Think about this, according to Emily's friend's testamony she did not change her ways. She keep on going out on the town quite often. One of her friends told her that he did not think it approate for her to out to parties so soon after killing Ryan. I do not know if this was the time or not but he supposedly, refered to Ryan's death as,"an unfortunate accident". She has continued to be disrespectful to Ryan and his family. There was not any remorse shown until she got her first 25 years. Rest well my friend!!!

jrbuffalo wrote:

I don't have words to describe how horrifying it is to realize that a justice system can be used for carrying out personal vindictive retaliation.
The real perpetrator needs to be caught and put behind bars.
There are some of us who are trying very hard to see that real justice does get served in Emily's case:
http://www.emilydowdy.com
Yes, she was railroaded.

In response to this unformed person I mistakenly said, he called Ryans horrable death an unfortunate accident. I sould have make it clear Emily's friend said that Emily said, that Ryans death was an unfortunate accident. How cold hearted can you get?

jrbuffalo wrote:

I don't have words to describe how horrifying it is to realize that a justice system can be used for carrying out personal vindictive retaliation.
The real perpetrator needs to be caught and put behind bars.
There are some of us who are trying very hard to see that real justice does get served in Emily's case:
http://www.emilydowdy.com
Yes, she was railroaded.

Ice Tea wrote:

I have only read the article posted here. It is clear to me, that the court was against her from the beginning. If there was a blood alcohol done (which normally they are done if there is an odor of alcohol on the victim)it is bull that a second blood alcohol was done. Sorry, I do not believe that. I don't know about GHB, but there are few things that clear your system in six hours, usually drugs do not clear that soon.
She is disabled and has suffered intensely for something she did not intend to do. My god, if the Browns were such devout Christians it looks like they would forgive and get on with their christian lives.
She was railroaded.

You are so bright, I do not know why we have need of the sun! Our name is Brewer. Good folks Christian or not does not want a killer returned to the highways. Emily has shown over and over that she does not intend to change the life style that brought about the death of an innocent young man. If you want her to live in you neighbor hood fine. However, as long as she thinks that the death of an innocent person is, "just an unfortunate accident" she needs to stay locked up until she realizes what she has done! Why can't she realize that she is the only one responsible for going to that bar, getting drunk, driving, and killing our precious grandson. You would have to be there to believe how little evidence the "defense" has. Everytime they bring in an "expert" to help Emily's case, their testamony usually helps the State. If there is another trial and they put on the "hotdog" defense the state will serve up the alcohol that Emily consumed between trials. The next time they bring up that poor pitiful Emily, the pictures of her carrying packages in both arms, closing car doors with either arm and standing on her tiptoes kissing someone in a pickup. All the while her father was walking along with his hands in his pockets. What kind of a dad would make a cripple carry packages anyway? When it comes to this case some of you give it an honest evaluation, however, some of you have no idea as to what has gone on since Emily left her appartment to go to a bar. She went to drink, she drank, she became drunk, and killed Ryan while drunk. End of story. Grandpaw Brewer No Brown

I wish all that have written here had been to court with us and saw Emily's attitude during the trials. Her expressions were cold and uncaring. It was her own friends who branded her a party girl not just the prosecution. When several of her friends were questioned in court they said yes like to drink and when they were asked if Emily drank and drove after killing Ryan thet said yes, IDoing so was in direct voilation of her bond which said no drive period and no drinking period.When asked in court to rebut what her friends said the only thing she said was they were all lying. She did not seem to learn anthnjng from Ryans death and disrespected him and his family by continuing to drink and drive right up to second trial, Of course she did not drink after that trial she was in the pen. The night of the wreck her blood was tested 2 times and nothing but alcohol was found. Her level was .25 and at 5am it was still .17. Her body was examed and it was determined that she had a clot coming from her urethra and not from vagina and was determined it probably caused by the steering wheel she hit in accident The hot dog event was not at a family even but a tailgate party. All 12 jurours were polled and asked if the picture affected the sentence and they said no, The said Emily was so cood acting in the trial that she seem to not care about what she did, The true victim in this cause is RYAN BREWER and his parents because Emily and her family keep bragging it out 24 jurors found he guity, That tells me alot

I wish all that have written here had been to court with us and saw Emily's attitude during the trials. Her expressions were cold and uncaring. It was her own friends who branded her a party girl not just the prosecution. When several of her friends were questioned in court they said yes like to drink and when they were asked if Emily drank and drove after killing Ryan thet said yes, IDoing so was in direct voilation of her bond which said no drive period and no drinking period.When asked in court to rebut what her friends said the only thing she said was they were all lying. She did not seem to learn anthnjng from Ryans death and disrespected him and his family by continuing to drink and drive right up to second trial, Of course she did not drink after that trial she was in the pen. The night of the wreck her blood was tested 2 times and nothing but alcohol was found. Her level was .25 and at 5am it was still .17. Her lawyers sent out samples of blood from yhay night and they found with but alcohol . NO GHBHer body was examed and it was determined that she had a clot coming from her urethra and not from vagina and was determined it probably caused by the steering wheel she hit in accident The hot dog event was not at a family even but a tailgate party. All 12 jurours were polled and asked if the picture affected the sentence and they said no, The said Emily was so cood acting in the trial that she seem to not care about what she did, The true victim in this cause is RYAN BREWER and his parents because Emily and her family keep bragging it out 24 jurors found he guity, That tells me alot

Ice Tea wrote:

I have only read the article posted here. It is clear to me, that the court was against her from the beginning. If there was a blood alcohol done (which normally they are done if there is an odor of alcohol on the victim)it is bull that a second blood alcohol was done. Sorry, I do not believe that. I don't know about GHB, but there are few things that clear your system in six hours, usually drugs do not clear that soon.
She is disabled and has suffered intensely for something she did not intend to do. My god, if the Browns were such devout Christians it looks like they would forgive and get on with their christian lives.
She was railroaded.

Dear Ice Tea: I do not know about the Brown's but the Brewers, whose son, brother, grandson and nephew have forgiven Emily. There is a difference in forgiving her and not holding her accountable for her actions. You may want her back out in society. On the other hand if you heard the evidence about her continuing to drink and I do not mean that "hotdog" picture. Her own mother said that she violated the conditions of her bond when it came to drinking alochol. She is not the invilid you and thousands are led to believe. I have seen pictures of her between trials where she was carrying packages in both arms, closing car doors with either hand and arm and standing on tip toes kissing a friend in an automobile, while here mother and father walks along side her empty handed!!! she was also very cheerful and outgoing. However,in court you can tell she has been coached on how to act, she looks so pitiful and takes her left hand to raise her right hand so she can be sworn in. Make you wonder what has happened to her since those pictures were taken? Her last lawyer had 31 years experience, he teaches law in some university, and has many awards. I was told he teaches young lawyers how to handle difficult judges. The problem with the defense is the same as it has been from day one. THE DEFENSE HAS NO DEFENSE!!
Usually the further you get from the date of the crime the less evidence you have. However, in this case every new trial gives the State time to collect more evidence. The Defense has tried to collect more evidence, but their witnesses usually bolster the States case against Emily even more. Let the defense serve the "hotdog pictures" and it will allow the State serve more evidence that Emily drank before and inbetween trials. It is her friends who has painted her as a party girl more than anyone. The more you hear about her life style the more you know that she doesn't care if she has killed someone or not she is still going to party. Sleep Well My Friend

The more you hear about her life style the more you know that she doesn't care if she has killed someone or not she is still going to party
ITS THIS STATEMENFT THAT NEEDS TO BE THOUGHT ABOUT THRY HEAR , IVE SEE NO ONE COME FORWARD TO CLAIM THET SAW HER LEAVE THE PARTY AND GET INTO HER CAR OR BEFORE LEAVING SAW HER ACTING DRUNK OR IMPAIRED HER HAVING A 2.0 AND SUPPOSE PARTY GIRIL WHO WAS USE TO DRINKING. BRINGS UP THE POINT THAT SHE WAS EFFECTED LATER BY ANOTHER EVENT

Think about this: Defense attorneys would go hungry if they only defended the innocent? Where would the so called experts make a living if they only testified for the innocent? These lawyers have found a cow to milk that gives plenty of milk. Why turn her out to dry up. It makes no difference to many of them what happens, as long as they receive their pay. Did you catch the phraze that said one of the expert witnesses gave $40,000 in her "TIME"!!! If she is so giving why did she take pay from the defendant and her family. I think somewhere around $800.00 an hour while testifying and $250.00 an hour for just sitting in court. A person could get rich if they could find enough criminals to testify for, or if they could get the ones they testify for to continually appeal their cases. Sounds like a bird nest on the ground. Think about this too: If a lawyer falls on the sword of his client and claims that he/she was ineffective as a lawyer and that gets his/her client off, can you imagine how much his business will pickup. There are many good lawyers however, there is that certain bunch that the bottom line is the dollar bill and they will do what it takes to bring that money in. If you do not have the evidence cry foul and if that doesn't work, tell the courts you were ineffective. The funny thing is that the lawyer who was helping to prove the first lawyer ineffective used the same tacticts as the first lawyer. Sleep well my friend