"Fox News Sunday" is heading to Louisville, Ky. Jack Conway, Kentucky's attorney general and the Democratic candidate for Senate , and Rand Paul, the Republican nominee and son of Representative Ron Paul, Republican of Texas, have agreed to a live debate on "Fox News Sunday" on Oct.3 at 9 a.m. (Eastern time).
Join the discussion below, or Read more at thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com.
#38826 May 5, 2012
The Biggest Cover-up in American History
In our previous article,“Exonerating President Obama,” we noted that the only Supreme
Court precedent for the meaning of the term “natural born Citizen” in Article II, Section 1
of the U.S. Constitution appears to be the Judge Harlan dissent in the United States v.
Wong Kim Ark case. In collaboration with a constitutional attorney, we have examined
the subject matter further.
We believe that to understand the complexity of this issue it will be essential to have an
understanding of the place that the concepts of “Natural Law” and the book titled Law of
Nations had obtained in the run up to the War of Independence with Great Britain. These
concepts of natural law were commonly used throughout the colonies to explain, defend
and justify the colonists’ contentions in our dispute with Great Britain.
Our investigation leaves no doubt that the Founding Fathers of our nation clearly understood the meaning
of the term “natural born Citizen” and its relation to Natural Law and Law of Nations.
When you have finished studying our research you will also understand that these terms
were used in the Declaration of Independence as well as in our Constitution and in the
constitutions of a large number of states written at the same time as the Constitutional
Convention was in session.
This background understanding will clarify why the delegates to the 1787 Constitutional
Convention elected to include “natural born Citizen” in the eligibility requirements for
the Office of the President of our nation and what it truly means.
In this article we will prove beyond all doubt that Barack Hussein Obama is not a natural
born Citizen and is thus ineligible to be President of the United States.
Citations following the textual part of this article are not simply to provide you the
references that support our assertions. They also provide you citations to reading material
that will help you understand the 1770 period in our History. To understand our
reasoning, it is important that the reader understands the Colonial people, and especially
the Founders with their educational backgrounds, their political fears and the nation’s
interrelationship with other nations at the time leading up to the War of Independence. In
this short article we could not provide all those dimensions, but we hope the reader will
study the references to fully understand the time period during which these things took
place. Unfortunately there are citations to books which are not available to download
online, so to get the whole picture, the reader will need to find a library to borrow the
2. Emer de Vattel, a Swiss scholar, published a now world famous work titled Law of
Nations in French in 1758. The Vattel work built upon the earlier philosophy of Natural
Law, especially that of de Wolf. But what made Vattel’s work so famous was his
adoption of a more modern and easier-to-understand format, which was written like a
scientific thesis. It started out with definitions that were worked into the initial textual
material in a manner very different from the heavy, incomprehensible writing style of the
earlier philosophers. H
The thing about iT is.........
IT's NOT complicated.....
Two US citizen parents
OR natural born.......
IS the ONLY way to be a "natural born" citizen.....
What is so HARD about THAT to understand?
No 'statute NOR 'code' can CHANGE that!!!!!!
THIS, tho, will help EVEN the
dweebiest" obots to understand.....
IF they want to at ALL!
#38828 May 5, 2012
Mr. President: Heroes Don’t Spike the Football
President Obama has spiked the Bin Laden Football so hard that Navy SEALS, retired and active duty, are hammering him over his zealous efforts to take credit for their handiwork.
In response to President Obama hiding behind our troops and taking credit for their actions – we’ve released our newest ad entitled CREDIT.
The ad tells a simple but powerful truth: Our service members sacrifice greatly to protect this nation and deserve the credit for keeping America safe, secure and strong.
SEALs slam Obama for using them as 'ammunition' in bid to take credit for bin Laden killing during election campaign
Serving and former US Navy SEALs have slammed President Barack Obama for taking the credit for killing Osama bin Laden and accused him of using Special Forces operators as ‘ammunition’ for his re-election campaign.
#38829 May 5, 2012
You tell 'em sis! All these rich republicans need to be taxed alot, and I mean alot more. Like over $250K taxable income make it 35%. Over $1 million make it 50%. Over $2 million 60%. Over $3 million and above 70%. Then we can make things happen!!
Rich people suck!!!!
#38830 May 5, 2012
No active Seal Team member, ever, would criticize a sitting president - on the contrary, they will not even reveal their identity and are as loyal as one can be. Remember the 'Swift Boaters' they are at it again. It is obvious a coward like you has never served a day in the military and thank god for that!
#38832 May 5, 2012
INA: ACT 301 - NATIONALS AND CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES AT BIRTH
Sec. 301.[8 U.S.C. 1401] The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth:
(a) a person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof;
(b) a person born in the United States to a member of an Indian, Eskimo, Aleutian, or other aboriginal tribe: Provided, That the granting of citizenship under this subsection shall not in any manner impair or otherwise affect the right of such person to tribal or other property;
(c) a person born outside of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents both of whom are citizens of the United States and one of whom has had a residence in the United States or one of its outlying possessions, prior to the birth of such person;
(d) a person born outside of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is a citizen of the United States who has been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year prior to the birth of such person, and the other of whom is a national, but not a citizen of the United States;
(e) a person born in an outlying possession of the United States of parents one of whom is a citizen of the United States who has been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year at any time prior to the birth of such person;
(f) a person of unknown parentage found in the United States while under the age of five years, until shown, prior to his attaining the age of twenty-one years, not to have been born in the United States;
(g) a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than five years, at least two of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years: Provided, That any periods of honorable service in the Armed Forces of the United States, or periods of employment with the United States Government or with an international organization as that term is defined in section 1 of the International Organizations Immunities Act (59 Stat. 669; 22 U.S.C. 288) by such citizen parent, or any periods during which such citizen parent is physically present abroad as the dependent unmarried son or daughter and a member of the household of a person (A) honorably serving with the Armed Forces of the United States, or (B) employed by the United States Government or an international organization as defined in section 1 of the International Organizations Immunities Act, may be included in order to satisfy the physical-presence requirement of this paragraph. This proviso shall be applicable to persons born on or after December 24, 1952, to the same extent as if it had become effective in its present form on that date; and
(h) a person born before noon (Eastern Standard Time) May 24, 1934, outside the limits and jurisdiction of the United States of an alien father and a mother who is a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, had resided in the United States. 302 persons born in Puerto Rico on or after April 11, 1899
NOT NATURAL BORN!!!!!!!!!!
#38833 May 5, 2012
You must not be keeping up. The article is pages back. Veteran's (SEALS) were quoted in this article, so have it your way....this must be a fake web site:
VETERANS FOR A STRONG AMERICA, EH?
“I am the 99%”
Since: Aug 11
#38834 May 5, 2012
A Patriotic sounding name doesn't make a site any more credible.
The site is not a news site so it has no obligation to tell the truth.
#38835 May 5, 2012
It's not the Site...it's the source! ie: Navy Seals...you would not be so bold as to question real HERO's would you?
Who is more believable (not counting Jessie Ventura) a retired SEAL or the website/blog/news agency?
#38837 May 5, 2012
It's been the same amount since 2005 and unless Congress acts on the law it will remain that level from now on.
#38838 May 5, 2012
Japan Nuclear Reactors Shut Off, Thousands March To Celebrate
#38839 May 5, 2012
Navy SEALS Slam Obama Over Campaign Ad
by Frank York on May 2, 2012
Several former and currently serving NAVY SEALS have slammed President Obama for exploiting their killing of Osama bin Laden for political gain in a recent ad.
The ad, entitled “One Chance” puffs Obama’s role in killing Osama and suggests that Mitt Romney would not have had the courage to kill the Islamic terrorist.
Ryan Zinke is a former Commander in the U.S. Navy spent 23 years as a SEAL and led a SEAL Team 6 assault unit. According to Zinke:“The decision was a no brainer. I applaud him for making it but I would not overly pat myself on the back for making the right call.
“I think every president would have done the same. He is justified in saying it was his decision but the preparation, the sacrifice – it was a broader team effort.”
According to Zinke:“The President and his administration are positioning him as a war president using the SEALs as ammunition. It was predictable.” From The Daily Mail:
A serving SEAL Team member said:“Obama wasn’t in the field, at risk, carrying a gun. As president, at every turn he should be thanking the guys who put their lives on the line to do this. He does so in his official speeches because he speechwriters are smart.
“But the more he tries to take the credit for it, the more the ground operators are saying,‘Come on, man!’ It really didn’t matter who was president. At the end of the day, they were going to go.”
Chris Kyle, a former SEAL sniper with 160 confirmed and another 95 unconfirmed kills to his credit, said:‘The operation itself was great and the nation felt immense pride. It was great that we did it.
But bin Laden was just a figurehead. The war on terror continues. Taking him out didn’t really change anything as far as the war on terror is concerned and using it as a political attack is a cheap shot.
In years to come there is going to be information that will come out that Obama was not the man who made the call. He can say he did and the people who really know what happened are inside the Pentagon, are in the military and the military isn’t allowed to speak out against the commander- in-chief so his secret is safe.
#38840 May 5, 2012
You are such a dope, there are more fake Navy Seal websites and Navy Seal wannabes than one cares to know – you’ve been duped you moron! Here is what the real Seal commanders had to say: The senior special operations leadership has warmed to Mr. Obama because he has shown he is a risk-taker (as evidenced by his decision to go forward with the bin Laden mission) who has "given them a longer leash" than former President George W. Bush did. "We're tickled s*itless because the guy has approved missions and the use of predator drones to a greater extent than his predecessor."
“I am the 99%”
Since: Aug 11
#38841 May 5, 2012
It is not Seals I question. I question the site claiming that they said this. They link to a story done by Mailonline who mentions unnamed former and currently serving Seals.
First red flag was "unnamed", second red flag was "currently serving".
I have a really hard time believing any active Seal would criticize the President to the press (breaking both the UMCJ laws and Seal tradidtion) and secondly I really have to be suspicious of not naming any of the supposed former Seals. It is not like they would be risking anything.
I put this on par with Elvis spottings.
“I am the 99%”
Since: Aug 11
#38842 May 5, 2012
Former Seals can have political agendas like anyone else.
I don't believe the claim of currently serving Seals saying these things for a second.
#38843 May 5, 2012
Veterans for a Strong America is looking for a place to run its hit online video — on television.
The ad praises the quiet heroism of the military personnel who killed Osama bin Laden in May 2011, and portrays President Barack Obama as a glory-hound eager to hog the credit.
With dramatic background images and a banner reading “Heroes don’t seek credit,” the ad shows a catalog of Obama’s statements describing his own responsibility for the mission:“I can report … I directed Leon Panetta … I was briefed … I met repeatedly … At my direction …”
“We’re at a point where we have no choice but to run that ad on TV,” Veterans for a Strong America director Joel Arends told The Daily Caller.
“We have an obligation to start educating and information the rest of America.”
The public’s response “has been incredible … it evoked very powerful feedback” both among veterans and swing-voters, Arends said. The online video attracted 700,000 viewers on Youtube during its first four days, and generated 3,500 emails.
Veterans for a Strong America, he said, does not have support from GOP-affiliated groups.
Why don't you go lay down by your dog bowl, and WAIT 'til you're called!
#38844 May 5, 2012
This proves nothing.
Here are two ... "fake" ... Navy Seals that you can go and look up while you live in your fantasy world:
"…Ryan Zinke, a former Commander in the US Navy who spent 23 years as a SEAL and led a SEAL Team 6 assault unit, said:‘The decision was a no brainer. I applaud him for making it but I would not overly pat myself on the back for making the right call."
"A serving SEAL Team member said:‘Obama wasn’t in the field, at risk, carrying a gun. As president, at every turn he should be thanking the guys who put their lives on the line to do this. He does so in his official speeches because he speechwriters are smart."
"Chris Kyle, a former SEAL sniper with 160 confirmed and another 95 unconfirmed kills to his credit, said:‘The operation itself was great and the nation felt immense pride. It was great that we did it.
‘But bin Laden was just a figurehead. The war on terror continues. Taking him out didn’t really change anything as far as the war on terror is concerned and using it as a political attack is a cheap shot."
"In the wake of a warm conservative reception for a web video trashing the president for “spiking the football” on the anniversary of Osama Bin Laden’s death, the conservative group Veterans for a Strong America plans to gather Navy SEALs and Special Forces operators to criticize the White House during the 2012 campaign.
“We’re looking to [put together] a coalition, to field SEALs and operators that want to come out publicly,” executive director of Veterans for a Strong America, Joel Arends, tells BuzzFeed.“I’ve had a lot of discussions with former SEALs and current SEALs. I’ve been talking to operators in the community. There is palatable discontent.”
The video, which took about ten days to produce, went viral. The ad has had more than 250,000 views on YouTube and he’s received some 4,000 emails. Arends was featured on Fox News channel Thursday morning.
Arends says the group is now looking at airing the advertisement on television in geographic areas with military communities.“Right now we’re going through the process analyzing where we think it would play best,” he says.
“They’re going to have the money” to air the spot, another Republican source told BuzzFeed."
#38845 May 5, 2012
So you would like an ...*active*... Seal ... "unnamed" ... and ... "currently serving" ...to put his name down for you, so you would not dispute the fact that he supports the organization??? Doesn't mean they don't support it financially.
Actually dispute it all you want and while you're putting it on par "with Elvis spottings:" put it where the sun don't shine. Who cares what you think???
Since: Oct 11
#38846 May 5, 2012
Did you hear the one were the Conservative and the liberal and the moderate...walk into a bar?
And the bartender say well hello Mitt! lol
“I am the 99%”
Since: Aug 11
#38848 May 5, 2012
LOL apparently you do.
#38849 May 5, 2012
Good God, Cornelius, being in any special forces unit has it's secrets! No they are not allowed the same political rights as you and I, most have security clearences that last! I have allway's had my doubts about Jessie, and I am confident no serving seal would say shit!
Add your comments below
|Hilltop Restuarant (May '09)||Sat||Butterfly||51|
|Pete tarantino (Aug '10)||Thu||Your stupid||120|
|What Constables does the best job for the commu...||May 20||The bottom of it||0|
|***Keep a Word~Drop a Word*** (Mar '10)||May 20||White_Lightning||126|
|looking for standing timber (Sep '11)||Sep '11||Jeff||1|
Find what you want!
Search Big Reedy Forum Now
Copyright © 2015 Topix LLC