Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Full story: www.cnn.com 201,188

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Full Story
Dude

Newark, DE

#158500 Sep 8, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Glad I could teach you something Rose. You finally figured out that HIV is a virus.
You're a tw*t.
Prof Marvel wrote:
<quoted text>
The dumb little pickaninny thinks she's the Rosa Parks of the Gay Liberation Movement.
Her's is a common affliction in the Negro Quarter.
And it really doesn't matter what the cause is. All you gotta do is stick "equality" somewhere in the agenda and she's all for it.
If the NAMBLA rights people start talking about freedom, equality and liberty, she'll be here self-flagellating her ignorant ass for them too.
Free at last! Free at last! Great God-Almighty free that ass!
You're a self-hating tw*t.
Winston Smith

Fredericksburg, VA

#158501 Sep 8, 2012
Prof Marvel wrote:
<quoted text>
Can't believe anyone is using the name Dr. Evelyn Hooker without busting out laughing.
Her study was completed in 1958 and completely ignored by the APA for good reason: it was not only riddled with errors, it was also done at the behest of the Mattachine Society who in fact supplied your "Rosa Parks of Gay Liberation" with select gay men to use as subjects.
This fumbling, San Francisco fag hag got everything wrong which is why the APA ignored her work -- until gay activists forced it on the APA in 1973.
Meanwhile there were hundreds of studies spanning the APA's 70 year history leading up to '73 that were peer-reviewed and showed without question homosexuality was a mental disorder and belonged on the APA's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Of Mental Disorders (DSM-II).
In other words, fella, you're slinging around LBGT rhetoric that's about 50 years out of date. Nobody uses Evelyn Hooker as a source anymore except boneheads who don't have a clue.
To sum up, there wasn't a single study that led to the APA dropping homosexuality from its DSM-II.
Not a single one.
Are we clear now?


You can't seem to get any facts right on anything, Gary. The APA had been around more than just 70 years when homosexuality was removed from the DSM. The name, APA, was adopted around 1890. Originally the organisation was formed around 1844 and assumed the name Association of Medical Superintendents of American Institutions for the Insane. Coincidently, this era was also the time when ludicrous notions about mental illness were prevalent. Patients were tortured in order to make them choose sanity over illness among other things. Priests did exorcisms to cast out demons too. The organisation was relatively young by the turn of the century. Need I remind you that this was also an era where blacks were thought by many to be intellectually inferior? This was a notion adopted by the vast majority of American citizens for quite a bit of our history. It wasn't until the middle of the last century that it became politically unacceptable to maintain that position. Not that racism is dead now.

In our relatively short time as a country we've given up a lot of our earlier opinions about things you think are facts.

Hundreds of studies proving homosexuality was a mental illness? You should have no problem bringing them to light. We'll need the actual articles in full, not mAssResistance's interpretations and summaries of them. C'mon now, shitferbrains, give us 100s of articles.

“The Great and Wonderful Marvel”

Since: Aug 09

Atlanta, GA

#158502 Sep 8, 2012
Winston Smith wrote:
<quoted text>
I was specific. Just because you're too ignorant to see it doesn't mean it isn't there, dumdum.
You'll ream nothing, internet tough guy. Not from mommy's basement you won't.
No, Winston, you weren't specific -- and the reason you weren't specific is because your understanding of these things goes no deeper than the LGBT rhetoric you pick up here.

And it's a pattern with you: You proclaim an LGBT slogan; I challenge you on it, you run from the discussion the way Dracula runs from the morning sun.

Dr. Hooker presented her study to the APA in Chicago in 1956.

Why did the APA continue to list homosexuality as a mental disorder until 1973?

You don't know the answer because your LGBT rhetoric doesn't cover detailed answers of this sort. But there's no rush, Winnie. I'll give you time to research a bullshit.

Why?

Because I like stupid bastards like you.

I'm you're friend.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#158503 Sep 8, 2012
Prof Marvel wrote:
<quoted text>
Your ignorance knows no bounds, does it?
I sold 120 books last month and about 50 so far this month. If I stay on pace this month I'll top 150 books total sold for the month.
This book is selling for $9.99 and using a pen name I won't reveal here. Royalties is 70%
Under a pen name you won't reveal? LOL. Yeah, right...

It's sad you couldn't even get a single friend to got to Amazon and "like" the book you *really* wrote. You know, the one that's got an Amazon Best Sellers Rank number around 720,000.
Prof Marvel wrote:
That's $1050 in royalties for the month of September--and that's just one of my books.
I bought a 2011 Scion two months ago and the note, insurance, gas usage for the month, cell phone and utility bill for my two bed apartment are all paid by my royalty check. When it's all send and done I have about $1000 left over.
Next month my latest book hits Kindle -- The Kosher Marine -- the story of a Hasidic Jew who joins the Marine Corps, gets shipped to Iraq and gets captured. In about six months that should be getting me $1000 --$2000 a month in royalties.
Yeah, and I should be getting $20K a month from my new CD I'll be releasing under a name I won't reveal here. LOL.
Prof Marvel wrote:
You're stupid. You'll find out about Kindle around 2020. Guys are getting rich while you're still cleaning toilets at Mickey-D's.
So do me a favor, STFU, OK?
Stop embarrassing our race.
Kindle? What's that?
LOL!
You are a self-hating black man, that's why you use racial slurs. You hate your mother, and other black women, including your mother.
Must suck to be you.
Winston Smith

Fredericksburg, VA

#158504 Sep 8, 2012
jacques renault wrote:
<quoted text>
the sky didnt part in 1973 because of Hooker and it has nothing to do with true science
post-APA 1973:
1980--William Friedkin's sequel to The Exorcist about gays was even more terrifying
1992 World Health Org did what APA did in 1973
it's political not scientific
Well jacquesass, tell us what a work of fiction like The Exorcist has to do with gays. I'm really going to enjoy hearing this load of crap. You may use either character to answer, jacquesass or Professor Marvel. I don't care which. Thanks in advance.
Winston Smith

Fredericksburg, VA

#158505 Sep 8, 2012
Prof Marvel wrote:
<quoted text>
No, Winston, you weren't specific -- and the reason you weren't specific is because your understanding of these things goes no deeper than the LGBT rhetoric you pick up here.
And it's a pattern with you: You proclaim an LGBT slogan; I challenge you on it, you run from the discussion the way Dracula runs from the morning sun.
Dr. Hooker presented her study to the APA in Chicago in 1956.
Why did the APA continue to list homosexuality as a mental disorder until 1973?
You don't know the answer because your LGBT rhetoric doesn't cover detailed answers of this sort. But there's no rush, Winnie. I'll give you time to research a bullshit.
Why?
Because I like stupid bastards like you.
I'm you're friend.
Quite funny, Gary. Now, reveal to us hundreds of studies showing homosexuality is a mental disorder.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#158506 Sep 8, 2012
Prof Marvel wrote:
<quoted text>
What's my "real name," bird brain?
See? You really don't know, do you?
You read what these homosexuals say and don't question it -- which is fine... just don't protest so much when I call you an idiot for doing it, OK?
YOU complained about people posting your real name. Were you lying?
Prof Marvel wrote:
<quoted text>
That's not equal rights, you meathead. That's a pick-up line Larry Brinkin used on a towel boy at his local bathhouse.
Did you go for it?
Prof Marvel wrote:
<
And the reason why I know it's not equal rights is because I researched it all the way back to the Greeks and Romans and never has anyone -- gay, straight, or neuter!-- defined equal rights as the right for a man to marry a man.
I notice you didn't say anything about a woman getting married to a woman. Your fixation on gay men is interesting.
Prof Marvel wrote:
Never.
But I could be wrong.
But I'm from Missouri -- show me I'm wrong.
A non issue. You are appealing to tradition. A logical fallacy.
Now, deal with the issue.
A man can marry a woman, so a woman should have that same right.
Can you come up with a logical reason she shouldn't?
LifeSavers

West Covina, CA

#158508 Sep 8, 2012
Never give a sucker an even break.

“The Great and Wonderful Marvel”

Since: Aug 09

Atlanta, GA

#158509 Sep 8, 2012
==========

Regnerus Study Update – University of Texas Rejects Allegations of Scientific Misconduct

Submitted by Admin on August 31, 2012 – 10:00 amNo Comment

The University of Texas at Austin has determined that no formal investigation is warranted into the allegations of scientific misconduct lodged against associate professor Mark Regnerus regarding his July article in the journal Social Science Research.

http://www.utexas.edu/news/2012/08/29/regneru...

==========

To sum up: no evidence Regnerus engage in ethical or academic violations or incompetence. Therefore, his study now becomes the gold standard.

“The Great and Wonderful Marvel”

Since: Aug 09

Atlanta, GA

#158510 Sep 8, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
YOU complained about people posting your real name. Were you lying?
<quoted text>
I could have been -- or I could have been using a pen name, talking about a different name, or never posted my name at all.

The point here, is you published a claim someone else made -- based on no more than the fact the person said it.

And we know this because I never published any name here at all --your homosexual pals claimed I did, but I never did.
I notice you didn't say anything about a woman getting married to a woman. Your fixation on gay men is interesting.
Of course it is when you see everything from the prism of homosexuality. But that's not normal ... or healthy --and underlines what's fundamentally wrong with you people -- you sexualize everything.
A non issue. You are appealing to tradition. A logical fallacy.
Now, deal with the issue.
And you're appealing to marital law which is based on the English common law tradition.
A man can marry a woman, so a woman should have that same right.
Can you come up with a logical reason she shouldn't?
Can you come up with a logical reason why a woman should marry a man?
LifeSavers

West Covina, CA

#158511 Sep 8, 2012
Just another typical dsy of watching the looney's post their filthy, nasty, racists and potty mouthed comments and trying to call them posts.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#158512 Sep 8, 2012
Prof Marvel wrote:
<quoted text>
I could have been -- or I could have been using a pen name, talking about a different name, or never posted my name at all.
The point here, is you published a claim someone else made -- based on no more than the fact the person said it.
You said it was your real name...
Prof Marvel wrote:
And we know this because I never published any name here at all --your homosexual pals claimed I did, but I never did.
<quoted text>
Sure.
Prof Marvel wrote:
Of course it is when you see everything from the prism of homosexuality. But that's not normal ... or healthy --and underlines what's fundamentally wrong with you people -- you sexualize everything.
That's rich coming from you!

Prof Marvel wrote:
And you're appealing to marital law which is based on the English common law tradition.
Can you come up with a logical reason why a woman should marry a man?
Dodge.
Can you come up with a logical reason why a woman shouldn't be able to marry a woman?
Answer, or just admit you can't.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#158513 Sep 8, 2012
Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
You're a tw*t.
<quoted text>
You're a self-hating tw*t.
Call me when you get out of grade school.
Floggers

West Covina, CA

#158514 Sep 8, 2012
My,my,my glad to hear the fools haven't left the hill.
Dude

Newark, DE

#158515 Sep 8, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Call me when you get out of grade school.
*grad school

:D

“The Great and Wonderful Marvel”

Since: Aug 09

Atlanta, GA

#158516 Sep 8, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
You said it was your real name...
You're lying again -- but prove me wrong: provide a cite.
Can you come up with a logical reason why a woman shouldn't be able to marry a woman?
Answer, or just admit you can't.
Yes.

Because the Regnerus study indicated the children of lesbian parents turn out disasters.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#158517 Sep 8, 2012
Prof Marvel wrote:
<quoted text>
You're lying again -- but prove me wrong: provide a cite.
<quoted text>
Not going to go though all these posts. People know what you wrote.
Prof Marvel wrote:
Yes.
Because the Regnerus study indicated the children of lesbian parents turn out disasters.
Rose's Law
Morons with no real argument scream, "But what about the children!?"
Not going to bother with the study because it has nothing to do with women getting married to each other. They can marry and not raise children, or raise children and not marry.
Try again, stupid.
You are a disaster.
Humongous Hetero Huey

Höst, Germany

#158518 Sep 8, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Can you come up with a logical reason why a woman shouldn't be able to marry a woman?
Answer, or just admit you can't.
I'll give two:

1. It's ridiculous.
2. See reason 1.

Can you give me a logical reason why I can't marry a tree?

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#158519 Sep 8, 2012
Humongous Hetero Huey wrote:
<quoted text>
I'll give two:
1. It's ridiculous.
2. See reason 1.
Just admit you don't have an argument.
Humongous Hetero Huey wrote:
Can you give me a logical reason why I can't marry a tree?
Trees have standards.
Quota

West Covina, CA

#158520 Sep 8, 2012
Have you filled your quota today?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Beverly Hills Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) 1 hr Buck Rohde 19,354
Armenian organized crime grows more complex (Oct '10) 12 hr makerizian 791
whats up 17 hr uoyevol 1
I like Beverly Hills as a NZer Oct 17 Michael K Mair 1
Elizabeth Pena dies at 55; actress in 'The Incr... Oct 16 Big mike 2
Jane Fonda Oct 14 Rushbo 3
NAACP Image Awards recognize soap actors Kristo... (Dec '12) Oct 14 dmw 76

Beverly Hills News Video

Beverly Hills Dating
Find my Match

Beverly Hills Jobs

Beverly Hills People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Beverly Hills News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Beverly Hills

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]