Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Prof Marvel wrote:

<quoted text>
Here's a cite showing The Little Black Book WAS given out at a GLSEN high school youth conference.
http://www.massresistance.org/docs/issues/bla...
You owe the forum an apology, you moron.
Let's see if you have enough class to do it.
(I won't hold my breath)

Hey Gary, I forgot to ask. I notice you cowardly avoided answering my question. You stated that the GSLEN was credited in the Little Black Book as being part of its production. We are all still waiting for you to indicate the page number where they are noted as being participants in its creation. Will you be supplying that any time soon Gary? Given that you have the entire contents memorized for your masturbatory needs, you should be able to supply the page number with no problem!!

Hey, and how about those remaining 13 bible verses that deal with homosexuality? Will you be presenting them anytime soon chicken shit coward?

LOL!! Gary Lloyd = lying douchebag tool!!

RiccardoFire wrote:

<quoted text>My verse was from the new testament, yours from the old. The old is mostly history and why we needed Jesus. But I forgive you since God has forgiven me.

I'm not in need of forgiveness, nor are you in any position to offer it.. You can peddle your sanctimoneousness somewhere else.

Mayor feels a `sense of failure' in marital split.

RiccardoFire wrote:

<quoted text>Not true liar: The medieval Catholic Church maintained that the Bible taught geocentricity.....One of the passages used to defend the biblical basis of geocentricity was Joshua 10:12-14, and later references to the same event, in which Joshua prayed,“Sun, stand thou still upon Gibeon; And thou, Moon, in the valley of Aijalon”(v. 12), that he might defeat the numerous armies assembled against his people. God immediately answered Joshua’s prayer, and in the following verse he wrote:“And the Sun stood still, and the Moon stayed.” Keil and Delitzsch have suggested that either the day appeared long to the warriors of Israel because of the greatness of the task they performed (i.e., defeating the enemy), or that God miraculously caused the day to be lengthened so the Lord’s army could perform its task. The former is consistent with similar language in other parts of the Old Testament, and the latter explanation is totally consistent with God’s infinite power over the Universe (1982, 2:106-112). In any case, as Joshua goes on to say in verse 14,“there was no day like that before it or after it.” Thus, whether miraculous or not, to say that these verses teach that the Earth continues to stand still, and that the Earth is the center of the Universe, is both a gross misinterpretation and a misapplication of the verse. This passage does not teach geocentricity, despite dingbat's claims to the contrary.

cut and paste from the mental gymnastics of christian apologetic sites don't impress me.

Genesis clearly stated that your ridiculous god created light before he created the stars that actually produce the light. It also clearly states that he created "two great lights" which included the moon. The moon does not now, nor has it ever generated light.

Leviticus 11:13 - 19:
‘And these you shall regard as an abomination AMONG THE BIRDS; they shall not be eaten, they are an abomination: the eagle, the vulture, the buzzard, 14 the kite, and the falcon after its kind; 15 every raven after its kind, 16 the ostrich, the short-eared owl, the sea gull, and the hawk after its kind; 17 the little owl, the fisher owl, and the screech owl; 18 the white owl, the jackdaw, and the carrion vulture; 19 the stork, the heron after its kind, the hoopoe, and the bat.

Bats are not birds, nor have they ever been birds.

As noted before, go peddle your religious bullshit somewhere else. This thread is not about your religion or anyone elses. No one cares what your ridiculous bible says.

The official platform language poised for approval at next week's Republican National Convention.

Doesn't fully represent the party's presumptive presidential nominee,Willard Mitt Romney / Paul D. Ryan, RNC Chairman Reince Priebus said August 21, 2012.

Prof Marvel wrote:

<quoted text>
Well, Winston, I've given you ample opportunity to explain why a man who claims to be a happily married hetero is more for the gay agenda than any gay person we've seen around here to date.
Rather than explain yourself, you've continued to display your signature foam in the mouth, wild-eye support of everything gay.
There's only one conclusion here: you're a gay guy masquerading as a hetero and that's how I'll treat you going forward -- and recommend everyone else treats you.
Now what were you saying, queer?

Well now, since you want me to come out of the closet with you, why don't you get your sweet little lips over here and pleasure me?

Prof Marvel wrote:

<quoted text>
Where did you read "indoctrinating requires placing a value on something?"
I answer that for you, Dingleberry: you didn't read it anywhere -- you pulled it out of your muchly corn holed ass.
Here's the free dictionary definition of indoctrinate:
==========
in·doc·tri·nate (n-dktr-nt)
tr.v. in·doc·tri·nat·ed, in·doc·tri·nat·ing, in·doc·tri·nates
1. To instruct in a body of doctrine or principles.
2. To imbue with a partisan or ideological point of view: a generation of children who had been indoctrinated against the values of their parents.
==========
That's "values" you moron -- NOT "placing a value on something".

Damn you are proud of being stupid! And I love your childish need to get right down to the nittiest of semantics in order to try and establish the slightest bit of non existent credibility for yourself!! So very desperate!!!

"To instruct in a body of principals"

prin·ci·pal
[prin-suh-puhl] Show IPA

adjective
1.
first or highest in rank, importance, VALUE, etc.; chief; foremost.

Principals ARE values. "Intructing in a body of principals" IS "placing values". Do you need the definitions of "Instructing" and "body" provided for you too numbskull??

Prof Marvel wrote:

<quoted text>
Which is to say, you people have decided -- entirely on your own!-- that the values and religion of mainstream America are wrong and need to be replaced with your values and phallic symbol worshiping hedonism and all the crap you publish in tracts like "The Little Black Book."

I haven't, either as myself, or as your imaginary "you people" ever made any declaration about anyone's religion you moron. Nor do I need to. This is the United States, NO ONE's religion has any thing to do with me. Nor is any religion being replaced by anything. Honestely, your baseless rhetoric gets stupider by the minute!!

As for values, discrimination is not now, nor has it ever been a value. Nor is lying (something you do and promote at abandon). Sorry Gary, but I have no interest in YOUR values. You've proven YOUR "values" to be worthless.

Feel free to try again Gary. Watching you spiral into more and more ridiculousness is hilarious this afternoon!!!

Hey, how you coming with telling us where the GLSEN is mentioned in your beloved masturbatory edition of the Little Black Book? And what about those bible verses Gary. You going to be supplying either today you cowardly sack of shit?!!!

Its a sad day when voters can be over ruled by one person.

Winston Smith wrote:

<quoted text>
Well now, since you want me to come out of the closet with you, why don't you get your sweet little lips over here and pleasure me?

I doubt he will Winnie. It's so tiny. And it stinks.

YUK!YUK!YUK!

Prof Marvel wrote:

<quoted text>
Why can't you write a post without insulting obese people?

I'm not insulting obese people, I'm insulting you.

Prof Marvel wrote:

<quoted text>
I'm not fat so it doesn't bother me,

Gary, I've seen your picture. I'm using it for my Topix avitar right now! Looking at you in the penis suit you so desperately want to wear is hilarious. As for you not being fat, I would beg to differ.

Prof Marvel wrote:

<quoted text>
but did you ever consider how hurtful your words are to the obese gays in the forum?

Since my "hurtful words" are directed at you specifically, while your "hurtful words" (and lies) are applied to ALL gays, I don't really think you are in a position to even ask that question you hypocritical piece of human garbage!!

Your disingenuous interest in "hurtful words" is hilarious!!!!

Prof Marvel wrote:

<quoted text>
Stop knocking fat people, Dingleberry. It undermines your whole "equality" scam.

I haven't knocked them Gary. I've merely stated I'm not into them. Now please, you little hypocritical jesus freak, please continue knocking gay people!!! I love it when you fundie religitards show off what hypocrites you truly are.

Thanks again for the great post Gary. Your meltdown is proceeding smashingly!!

Prof Dingleberry wrote:

<quoted text>
Erm, no Gary Lloyd, fat ass liar, it most certainly wasn't "handed out". There were 10 copies of it that were accidently brought by an organization called Fenway Community Health. The 10 copies that were brought to the event were placed on a table belonging to Fenway Community Health. They were NEVER passed out.

Don't confuse Gollum with facts, Dingleberry. Let him enjoy his tempest in a teapot.

Frank Rizzo wrote:

<quoted text>
I doubt he will Winnie. It's so tiny. And it stinks.
YUK!YUK!YUK!

Ahhh, the voice of experience.

marla wrote:

<quoted text>
Fkk off, phagggett bittch. Try doing something positive with your life for a change.

Did you forget the end of the story?

Brown Lipstick wrote:

<quoted text>
Yo dingleberry, you gonna be at the crisis Zionism seminar this afternoon. Maybe we can look around and find your common sense along with the Zionist perverts fixing those youth studies tilted toward your liking.
Brown and chunky.
Get the hell outta my tent!

HOW TO IDENTIFY A NUTTY IDEOLOGUE - They are the people that inject their nutty osbessions into every conversation they enter, regardless if it has anything remotely to do with what is being discussed.

This is Topix Shitlips, you should be able to find an anti-Semite thread somewhere. Run along now.

luv Sarah Palin wrote:

<quoted text>
Dear,
I hate to tell you but you will NOT survive and there is a room in hell reserved for you.
Give my regards to your anti- Christian ilk when you get there.

Yeah? Just how do you intend to verify that, Miss Shit-for-Brains?

RiccardoFire wrote:

<quoted text>Is that one single interpretation from just you? That's why I used the bible verse to explain the whole verse, then be fair and post the whole book. When u read a book, is it fair to take one paragraph to make a point?

Depends. If those promoting the book repeatedly tell you that the book is infallible as it is, then yes, one should be able to take one paragraph and still have it be infallible. If they can't, it isn't infallible.

Your choice, which will it be??!!!! LOL!!!

Reality wrote:

<quoted text>Christian values, you have to be shitting me. WTF do you know about Christian values?

I know! And I've told her repeatedly I have nothing against christians. Stupid people, yes, and she's as stupid as they come. She's NOT a christian... she's a retard.

luv Sarah Palin wrote:

<quoted text>
Lol well said.
Her hate for Christian values knows no limits.

"christian values" ...what an oxymoron!!

Mona Lott wrote:

<quoted text>
Yeah? Just how do you intend to verify that, Miss Shit-for-Brains?

the same way you intend to PROVE she is not correct...
Miss...oh you get it...
you silly bully....

Here comes the Judge wrote:

Its a sad day when voters can be over ruled by one person.

It's a sad day when American citizens don't even know how our country works.