Carla Hughes' Murder Trial Delayed until Summer

You're the one who is condescending. Look at most of your blog entries and I don't care if you disagree with my responses and I honestly don't give a damn about your marriage. Your marriage is no comparison to this case. End of story!
What do you mean by this response?

"You have a good now, you hear?"

Just Me wrote:

The "how" is very obvious, so that shouldn't even be a question, but that's just my opinion as well. Wow, thanks for the enlightenment that this has nothing to do with MY marriage. I wasn't aware. Seriously, my point was that someone can become very attached to anyone in the 90 days that you feel as though is not possible. How Carla could have done this is obvious by the evidence against her. YOU may not feel as though this is possible, but the obvious is that it IS VERY possible because, as you can see in this case, IT HAPPENED. My reason for bringing up MY MARRIAGE in comparison was simply to state that a person can fall in love with someone in that short amount of time. What that person will do in order to keep that person is another arguement all together.
If you don't like someone using comparisons, or disagreeing with you on something that YOU feel is not possible, keep your opinions to yourself and then no one will disagree with you. Be rude, and you'll get the same tone back. I really don't take too kindly to someone trying to speak down to me. I have too much sense to ever allow that.
You have a good now, you hear?
<quoted text>

Every wrote:

<quoted text>
Well to be honest Tammy; your sentence was incorrect as well. It is "every single one". Thanks! It's not that grammar isn't taught in MS but when blogging, people usually just type rather than little for a damn grammar coach. We are talking about Carla not grammar. Thanks. By the way I am from Mississippi and highly educated.

how do you expect people from Ms to learn grammar. Isn't one of their teacher's in jail for murder? Wonder how she feels now? Real stupid I bet. And I even bet that the Guy that she killed the Banks girl over, is messing with someone else already.

Look, I truly believe that Carla is innocent and nothing can change my mind about that. There were no eye witnesses/ Carla's finger prints were not found at the crime scene/was her car even checked for Ms. Avis's blood-because quite natuarlly she would have had to travel from Avis's house in her car?/ So what the shoes had blood on it./ Look at how many days later Carla was actually pick up for the murder and her and keyon shared shoes- had more than enought time to put those shoes in Carla's home! I can go on and on but it will only piss off. I live here in Austin Texas and about 6 years ago a guy was let loose for the murder of my little counsin. The jury found him not guily due to resonable doubt. And he actually was the murderer. Can you believe a jury let a cold bloodedmurderer go scott free just like that. At that point I gave up in the justice system. They said the state didnt provide enough evidence against him. Thats bull! My counsin had his DNA under her nail. Eye witness sees him fleeing on foot from the crime scense. Two other siblings identify him in a lineup and they let him go. They was more than enough resonable doubt in Carla's situation. That girl is innocent and her family needs to fight this to the end.

It Bees Done!!!

It bees Done!

Tammy wrote:

My God! Are they teaching grammar in schools in MS? Everyone single one of these comments is wrought with grammatical errors. What's worse...is that these misstatements and improper syntax is common for MS bloggers. Please people, I implore you to use spell-check and look over your comments before you post them. You all are giving us a bad name.

Hello kettle. Look at your second line it makes no sense.