Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Q: What a good word to discribe Willard Mitt Romney?

A: Flake

Gender segregationist marriage harms marriage for everyone.

Brian_G wrote:

Gender segregationist marriage harms marriage for everyone.

You are a harm to every thinking person everywhere.

Brian_G wrote:

Gender segregationist marriage harms marriage for everyone.

Sorry Brian......but NO, it doesn't!!!

My marriage has NO affect on you or your marriage and my marriage certainly DOESN'T harm me or my wife!!!

Thankyou Mr.Judge, you have truly made my day!

RnL2008 wrote:

<quoted text>
Sorry Brian......but NO, it doesn't!!!
My marriage has NO affect on you or your marriage and my marriage certainly DOESN'T harm me or my wife!!!

You are absolutely right. Years back, people thought that giving rights to black people would harm society but all it did was introduce new ideas and ways of life. I wish that everyone would grow up and understand that being gay is not your choice, nobody chooses to be discriminated against and homophobes are just people who are scared to give rights to people who are different than them.

Abi_07 wrote:

<quoted text>
You are absolutely right. Years back, people thought that giving rights to black people would harm society but all it did was introduce new ideas and ways of life. I wish that everyone would grow up and understand that being gay is not your choice, nobody chooses to be discriminated against and homophobes are just people who are scared to give rights to people who are different than them.

you mjust be blind or stupid I see everyone of our major cities gutted by this Black infestation, welfare crime drive by shootings the destruction of every value and anything decent your off the wall

Wat the Tyler wrote:

You are a harm to every thinking person everywhere.

My arguments target issues; they insult people. When I say 'Same sex marriage harms civil discourse' the quote above demonstrates exactly what I mean.

MoreTruth wrote:

<quoted text>
Aret u for real. You're a Moron. I bet you never made it past 6th grade. You're not too bright u know. For Sure

well, bet on it then.... You'll be a loser at gambling as you are in life too.... SMOOCH!!!

MoreTruth wrote:

<quoted text>
I really think this fla+coc.ker ain't right. Someone left the door open from the looney bin. That's Right WOW

Do you wear Boxers, tighty whiteys, K-Mart Specials ??........
Ahh I got it...!
training pants!!.

ELH wrote:

<quoted text>
The "sacredness" of "reproductive" sex? Yep, marriage is so revered and holy that 50% of heterosexual couples end up WALK AWAY from their (oh,so very) "sacred" vows...
Why do you feel the need to justify your hate and ignorance with these ridiculous (and long winded) comments? We really don't give a crap.
<quoted text>
Butt...butt...butt... I bet you would just love to do THAT.

"The "sacredness" of "reproductive" sex? Yep, marriage is so revered and holy that 50% of heterosexual couples end up WALK AWAY from their (oh,so very) "sacred" vows...
Why do you feel the need to justify your hate and ignorance with these ridiculous (and long winded) comments? We really don't give a crap."
-If you don't give a crap, then don't get married. It's just that simple. The whole point of marriage isn't just to reproduce, but to also provide a MOTHER & FATHER for whom the child can connect with. A heterosexual union (REAL marriage) will allow a greater understanding & appreciation of the opposite sex, not just for survival, but also for commitment, developing morals, & most importantly CREATING A FAMILY. Homosexual unions provide neither, so when the child grows up, he/she will grow up to hate the gay parents & he/she also grow up as a sexist. And studies have shown children of gay & single-parent households grow up with worse problems than children of married MEN & WOMEN. That's telling something right there! But hey, since you queers don't really care so much, then I think you shouldn't be allowed to get married. Problem? GET OVER IT.

"Butt...butt...butt... I bet you would just love to do THAT."
-No but I'm sure Jerry Sandusky would LOL

Brian_G wrote:

Gender segregationist marriage harms marriage for everyone.

Funny that no one has successfully proven that in court, ain't it? They just make blanket statements, but have NO EVIDENCE to back it up.

ELH wrote:

<quoted text>
Yep, the WHO, UNICEF and the CDC are all shills for the gay "agenda"... I'd have to be an real idiot to believe that HETEROSEXUAL WOMEN are the fastest growing population of NEW HIV cases or that WORLDWIDE 90% of people diagnosed with HIV are HETEROSEXUAL. What are FACTS compared to the rantings of a teenaged homophobe with some serious reading comprehension problems who already "did the math" for me...

Yeah & guess where those heterosexual women are getting HIV? HOMOSEXUAL MEN,& probably Bisexuals too!
I heard polygamy runs rampant with the gay & bisexual community, if fact I have seen it is common (after knowing a few fags myself) so I wouldn't at all be surprise if it was you fags who started the mess.

Also, if heterosexuals have "90% of AIDS", then how come many parents, my parents' parents, & my parents' parents' parents didn't have it. AIDS didn't surface until the 1980s & medicine for it didn't appear until 90s, so explain how can 90% of heterosexuals have aids when so many of them have existed for over THOUSANDS of years? Where's the worldwide epidemic?

thisGuy wrote:

<quoted text>
"The "sacredness" of "reproductive" sex? Yep, marriage is so revered and holy that 50% of heterosexual couples end up WALK AWAY from their (oh,so very) "sacred" vows...
Why do you feel the need to justify your hate and ignorance with these ridiculous (and long winded) comments? We really don't give a crap."
-If you don't give a crap, then don't get married. It's just that simple. The whole point of marriage isn't just to reproduce, but to also provide a MOTHER & FATHER for whom the child can connect with. A heterosexual union (REAL marriage) will allow a greater understanding & appreciation of the opposite sex, not just for survival, but also for commitment, developing morals, & most importantly CREATING A FAMILY. Homosexual unions provide neither, so when the child grows up, he/she will grow up to hate the gay parents & he/she also grow up as a sexist. And studies have shown children of gay & single-parent households grow up with worse problems than children of married MEN & WOMEN. That's telling something right there! But hey, since you queers don't really care so much, then I think you shouldn't be allowed to get married. Problem? GET OVER IT.
"Butt...butt...butt... I bet you would just love to do THAT."
-No but I'm sure Jerry Sandusky would LOL

"studies have shown" that 4 out of 5 vocal homophobes are secretly gay.

You have NOTHING to back this statement up: "...when the child grows up, he/she will grow up to hate the gay parents & he/she also grow up as a sexist." Not one single piece of evidence.

RiversideRedneck wrote:

and whats with the "gay & lesbian" names? dont you realize that youre segregating yourselves?? lol, shouldnt it just be gay? cuz you "gays" are all the same

LOL "Gay" (happy) is hardly the term I would describe queers, no matter how happy they appeared. Most of them are miserable people. Just call them what they are---perverts!

Mona Lott wrote:

<quoted text>
"studies have shown" that 4 out of 5 vocal homophobes are secretly gay.
You have NOTHING to back this statement up: "...when the child grows up, he/she will grow up to hate the gay parents & he/she also grow up as a sexist." Not one single piece of evidence.

""studies have shown" that 4 out of 5 vocal homophobes are secretly gay."
-LOL "4 out of 5"? In the real world it's like 0.00000003 out of 2. Also, when are you perverts ever going to understand that just because people don't agree with you, doesn't mean they are "in" to you. We heteros don't want you, so pretending like we do. I personally I'm not scared of gays, no matter how annoying they are, & I just don't approve of the choices that made. So what part of that concept don't you understand?

"You have NOTHING to back this statement up"
-Actually I do. When was the last time you saw a HETEROSEXUAL hit on a someone of the same sex? I know the answer: NEVER

"...when the child grows up, he/she will grow up to hate the gay parents & he/she also grow up as a sexist." Not one single piece of evidence."
-No fudgee, when children grow up with gay parents, they grow up DESPISING them. Children of lesbians are never allowed to see their REAL BIOLOGICAL father, & children of gay men grow up being depraved of an actual mother. There are also more molestation & abuse cases related with gay parents than there are with heterosexual molestation cases. And even the children of the gays realize their "family" isn't natural just by seeing a father-mother-son(daughter) family & it CONFUSES the shit of the kids of the gays! That's why many children of gays end growing up being gay!

Source: http://downloads.frc.org/EF/EF08L45.pdf

ELH wrote:

<quoted text>
Yep, the WHO, UNICEF and the CDC are all shills for the gay "agenda"... I'd have to be an real idiot to believe that HETEROSEXUAL WOMEN are the fastest growing population of NEW HIV cases or that WORLDWIDE 90% of people diagnosed with HIV are HETEROSEXUAL. What are FACTS compared to the rantings of a teenaged homophobe with some serious reading comprehension problems who already "did the math" for me...

LOL Now you're repeating yourself.
If you faggots would just use common sense, you would realize that the majority of the human population has been HETEROSEXUAL for over THOUSANDS OF YEARS! Which means, if heterosexual sex caused AIDS, then it would have been a worldwide epidemic THOUSANDS of years ago.

So where's the worldwide AIDS epidemic?

You queers & your queer-like delusions make me laugh!

Winston Smith wrote:

<quoted text>
You did the calcualtions for what? I suspect an anencephalic fetus has a better grasp of langauge than you.
The statement wasn't that 90% of heterosexuals were infected, it was that 90% of HIV infected people are heterosexual. There is a difference and I'll try to explain it to you.
Lets say for example that you have a room with 1000 people. In this room there are 100 gay men and 900 straight men. There are also 50 people infected with HIV in the room. If I tell you that 90% of the people infected with HIV in this room are straight, give us the number of straight men in the room that are infected with HIV. I'll give you a hint, the number is nowhere near 810.
Learn to read.

I read the damn article & I thought it was COMPLETE BULLSHIT.

Here. Let me show you why:
100 gay men + 900 straight men = 1000 people
**50% people had HIV, in others, that is NOT 90%!

So how the hell can 90% of heterosexuals be infected with HIV when 50% of the 1000 people have it? That makes no fucking sense

50%(500 people) < 90%(900 people)

Learn how to do algebra!

RnL2008 wrote:

<quoted text>
Wow, what an imagination you have......she attacked him for saying "OKAY"........someho w I just don't believe that!!!
If marriage should ONLY be for those who can produce children......than infertile/sterile opposite-sex couples should be banned from marriage and so should opposite-sex couples who are past the childbearing years.
Isn't that what an infertile/sterile couple needs to do in order to have a child......use artificial insemination? Why would it be okay for one type of couple, but not another?
And it is you that is ranting all over these forums......making up your stupid stories that you think I'm gonna believe.
I have no issue with you having your opinions about Gays and Lesbians.......what I do have an issue with is your lying propaganda that you believe in.........that makes you ignorant and NO ONE cares if you're a College Student in some Engineering Program........there are those of us in these threads that have high level degrees.......and still you call us names.
Now, go have a good day......and try not to be so angry!!!

COOL STORY BRO