Did you vote today?

BARNEYII wrote:

<quoted text>
I can play this game, you name some things you think president is doing well with.
Lets see just how objective" you are.

I would have to think long and hard on that one, nothing just jumps out at me. I was glad that the military and intelligent sources got Bin Laden but then he had to take so much credit. I can't really think of to many good things going on right now, but not all of that is his fault, actually probably very little is directly his fault, unlike with Bush, where everything was his fault. Gas prices are going down. Groceries are cheaper, houses don't cost as much, interest rates are down to nothing. The dollar is nearing historic lows, causing our exports to be more attractive. A lot of the Hispanics that were working around here have gone back to Mexico. Of course this is a lot like dealing with kids, I ask you something, you avoid by asking me questions. If you go back through prior posts, I have corrected outrages charges by conservative posters and you will not find where I have spent a lot of time trying to find an article that skews the details to my way of thinking. Anyway, you evidently have no problem with any thing that Obama has done. I can't say that about anybody I know or support. I have never agreed with anyone position much more than half the time. I have voted for candidates from both parties, I have always voted for the person. You can probably say you vote the party.

BARNEYII wrote:

<quoted text>
I can play this game, you name some things you think president is doing well with.
Lets see just how objective" you are.

Oh yeah, you said that you can play this game, you haven't yet.

well wrote:

<quoted text> Well he gives foodstamps, wellfare and money to the islamic brotherhood very well while our economy is suffering.

. First, the money isn’t going to the Muslim Brotherhood, or even to the Egyptian government per se, but to the Egyptian military. We’ve been providing military assistance to Egypt since the days of the Camp David Accords, and it’s fairly well recognized that it was the close ties between the U.S. and Egyptian military’s that allowed government officials to keep tabs on what was going on during last February’s revolution, and exercise some degree of influence to prevent a bloodbath. Given the ongoing political uncertainty in Egypt, it is probably wise to keep those channels open. Second, the money isn’t even going to Egypt, it’s going to U.S. defense contractors who have ongoing contracts to supply the Egyptian military.

But you know those are just facts, and who lets facts get in the way of a good partisan political rant

Andy wrote:

<quoted text>
Oh yeah, you said that you can play this game, you haven't yet.

I disagree, you just showed how "objective you are.

BARNEYII wrote:

<quoted text>
I disagree, you just showed how "objective you are.

You said you could play the game, he'll, you shouldn't even be allowed to attend

Andy wrote:

<quoted text>
I would have to think long and hard on that one, nothing just jumps out at me. I was glad that the military and intelligent sources got Bin Laden but then he had to take so much credit. I can't really think of to many good things going on right now, but not all of that is his fault, actually probably very little is directly his fault, unlike with Bush, where everything was his fault. Gas prices are going down. Groceries are cheaper, houses don't cost as much, interest rates are down to nothing. The dollar is nearing historic lows, causing our exports to be more attractive. A lot of the Hispanics that were working around here have gone back to Mexico. Of course this is a lot like dealing with kids, I ask you something, you avoid by asking me questions. If you go back through prior posts, I have corrected outrages charges by conservative posters and you will not find where I have spent a lot of time trying to find an article that skews the details to my way of thinking. Anyway, you evidently have no problem with any thing that Obama has done. I can't say that about anybody I know or support. I have never agreed with anyone position much more than half the time. I have voted for candidates from both parties, I have always voted for the person. You can probably say you vote the party.

You see any questions in your post here?

Andy wrote:
<quoted text>

No, you are not objective enough to admit that there is anything that your leader is doing is failing. You spend hours researching anything that will lay the nation's problems on anyone but Obama. I have never asked anyone to agree with me. Not since the fifth grade have I seen such hero worship as you display.

"you will not find where I have spent a lot of time trying to find an article that skews the details to my way of thinking"

I would not expect you to, unless you argue with yourself, and I don't think that is out of the realm of possabilities,

Nor do I see you "researching anything that will lay proof to your opinions.

Andy wrote:

<quoted text>
You said you could play the game, he'll, you shouldn't even be allowed to attend

As much as I kick your ass I can understand why you would say that.

BARNEYII wrote:

<quoted text>
As much as I kick your ass I can understand why you would say that.

You are the only one saying that, you have no followers, you just follow. Still waiting for you to play the game, just blindly following whatever you are told to believe.

BARNEYII wrote:

<quoted text>
You see any questions in your post here?
Andy wrote:
<quoted text>
No, you are not objective enough to admit that there is anything that your leader is doing is failing. You spend hours researching anything that will lay the nation's problems on anyone but Obama. I have never asked anyone to agree with me. Not since the fifth grade have I seen such hero worship as you display.
"you will not find where I have spent a lot of time trying to find an article that skews the details to my way of thinking"
I would not expect you to, unless you argue with yourself, and I don't think that is out of the realm of possabilities,
Nor do I see you "researching anything that will lay proof to your opinions.

I was answering your prior post, the one you sent to avoid showing that you have to tow the party lines. I have reviewed your prior posts and have decided that I might not be communicating with an adult. I sure hope that you aren't a thirteen year old girl

Andy wrote:

<quoted text>
I was answering your prior post, the one you sent to avoid showing that you have to tow the party lines. I have reviewed your prior posts and have decided that I might not be communicating with an adult. I sure hope that you aren't a thirteen year old girl

I hope you're not the guy in the wheelchair.

Redd Neckerson wrote:

<quoted text>
I hope you're not the guy in the wheelchair.

Making fun of the handicapped, I am not, I think.

Andy wrote:

<quoted text>
Making fun of the handicapped, I am not, I think.

No D.A., just hoping you're not the same guy that seemed somewhat reasonable a while back...and not the silly fricker you seem to be.

Andy wrote:

<quoted text>
I was answering your prior post, the one you sent to avoid showing that you have to tow the party lines. I have reviewed your prior posts and have decided that I might not be communicating with an adult. I sure hope that you aren't a thirteen year old girl

Is a thirteen year old boy what you looking for treak?

Andy wrote:

<quoted text>
I was answering your prior post, the one you sent to avoid showing that you have to tow the party lines. I have reviewed your prior posts and have decided that I might not be communicating with an adult. I sure hope that you aren't a thirteen year old girl

What post number would that be?

Redd Neckerson wrote:

<quoted text>
No D.A., just hoping you're not the same guy that seemed somewhat reasonable a while back...and not the silly fricker you seem to be.

Sure sounds like him, now that you mentioned it. This one sounds lucid on occasion

BARNEYII wrote:

<quoted text>
"We didn't get a credit downgrade for the first time in our nation's history for being fiscally responsible".
Let me give you a little backup on this'
The last full quarter of the Bush Presidency, the economy shrank by 9%, the worst downturn since the Great Depression.

I have already covered this. As long as there is one party controlling the white house and the other controlling congress we can never see what a president is made of. We have seen what kind of disaster Obama got us into when he had control of both houses of congress for the first two years of his presidency. Can you say downgrade? If the shrinkage of the economy was so bad, why didn't we get downgraded under Bush? I think you know the reason. If Mitt Romney gets elected and the house and senate go Republican, and the economy isn't at the least showing a strong recovery, you will be able to call him out on it like I am doing Obama. If the economy is still bad, then you and I will probably be saying the same things. Of course who we would want to replace Romney will, in all likelyhood, be vastly different.

BARNEYII wrote:

<quoted text>
History says you have no idea of which you speak.
With twenty years on each side and since some of the ups and downs of the U.S. business cycle lie beyond the direct control of policymakers, one would expect similar results in the two groups. Not so. Instead, one discovers below a significant advantage when a Democrat occupied the White House in each of the five categories.
% Per Annum Democrat Republican Bush43
GDP Growth 4.1% 2.9% 2.2%
Employment 2.9% 1.7% 0.5%
CPI 4.0% 5.1% 3.0%
DJIA 8.1% 6.5% 0.9%
Dollar +0.8%-3.6%-5.9%

Maybe I'm too simple, but I didn't understand one thing you just posted. But here is some common sense info for you. The ups and downs of the economy is, and always has been, consumer driven. If the consumers feel confident enough to spend money then businesses will hire, unemployment will go down, investors will start to invest, and our economy will get stronger. It's the law makers job to pave the way for that type of environment. But everything still hinges on whether or not consumers are willing to let go of their disposable income. The numbers will take care of themselves. You put entirely too much stock in charts and statistics.

In 2008, Richard Hayes Phillips book, Witness To A Crime: A Citizens' Audit of an American Election, was published. That book is an absolute condemnation of vote fraud in the State of Ohio. Phillips, who I interviewed when I had my radio show, examined 126,00 ballots, 127 poll books and 141 voter signature books from 18 counties: "Thousands of ballots in heavily Democratic precincts were pre-punched for third-party candidates. Voting machines were rigged, tabulators were rigged, ballot boxes were stuffed, ballots were altered, ballots were sorted according to candidate, and ballots were destroyed."

Fair and impartial elections is our absolute right in this country regardless of what party you belong to or what candidate you support. For the destroyers and their minions, putting the same incumbents back into office to carry out the planned destruction of this republic is the only goal. The Department of InJustice under Eric Holder, a racist and as corrupt a political animal as they come, is going after many states in their attempt to stop voter registration fraud. The Democratic Party wants illegal aliens, felons and dead people voting. It's the only way they can win. A dirty machine stealing our elections for their agenda.

Obama/Soetoro has no constitutional authority to run for the presidency. He didn't in 2008, yet that malignant narcissist and pathological liar continues to camp out in the the people's White House because of cowardice by judges and career politicians. Barry Soetoro, the last known legal name for Barack Hussein Obama, is already on the campaign trail and now - unless it is stopped - the mechanism is in place to fix the election in his favor - again.

Spanish Company Will “Count” American Votes Overseas In November
"When the Spanish online voting company SCYTL bought the largest vote processing corporation in the United States, it also acquired the means of manufacturing the outcome of the 2012 election. For SOE, the Tampa based corporation purchased by SCYTL in January, supplies the election software which records, counts, and reports the votes of Americans in 26 states–900 total jurisdictions–across the nation.

BARNEYII wrote:

<quoted text>
Is a thirteen year old boy what you looking for treak?

Always into name calling and never into answering my question.

guest wrote:

In 2008, Richard Hayes Phillips book, Witness To A Crime: A Citizens' Audit of an American Election, was published. That book is an absolute condemnation of vote fraud in the State of Ohio. Phillips, who I interviewed when I had my radio show, examined 126,00 ballots, 127 poll books and 141 voter signature books from 18 counties: "Thousands of ballots in heavily Democratic precincts were pre-punched for third-party candidates. Voting machines were rigged, tabulators were rigged, ballot boxes were stuffed, ballots were altered, ballots were sorted according to candidate, and ballots were destroyed."
Fair and impartial elections is our absolute right in this country regardless of what party you belong to or what candidate you support. For the destroyers and their minions, putting the same incumbents back into office to carry out the planned destruction of this republic is the only goal. The Department of InJustice under Eric Holder, a racist and as corrupt a political animal as they come, is going after many states in their attempt to stop voter registration fraud. The Democratic Party wants illegal aliens, felons and dead people voting. It's the only way they can win. A dirty machine stealing our elections for their agenda.
Obama/Soetoro has no constitutional authority to run for the presidency. He didn't in 2008, yet that malignant narcissist and pathological liar continues to camp out in the the people's White House because of cowardice by judges and career politicians. Barry Soetoro, the last known legal name for Barack Hussein Obama, is already on the campaign trail and now - unless it is stopped - the mechanism is in place to fix the election in his favor - again.
Spanish Company Will “Count” American Votes Overseas In November
"When the Spanish online voting company SCYTL bought the largest vote processing corporation in the United States, it also acquired the means of manufacturing the outcome of the 2012 election. For SOE, the Tampa based corporation purchased by SCYTL in January, supplies the election software which records, counts, and reports the votes of Americans in 26 states–900 total jurisdictions–across the nation.

Well Boo Hoo.

The screw was put to the Democratic candidates in Ohio, no matter how you try to twist the truth.
http://www.salon.com/2008/10/15/voter_suppres...
http://isaacs.newsvine.com/_news/2008/03/06/1...
Hitler used these same tactics.