Show us your TAX returns Mitt!!!

Joe Yule Sr wrote:

<quoted text>
I happen to know a few business owners who didn't read/hear it that way at all. You're not good at objective, are you?(Off the topic but why, exactly, do you have so much hate in you? Do you go to church?)
As a business owner, some of your success IS built upon the infrastructure (roads, internet, education) this great nation provides. It'd be a lot harder to sell widgets if I couldn't take orders online, or ship via rail or truck, or hire qualified widget assembly people. If Steve Jobs was born in Turkmenistan you'd have never heard of him.

Joe Yule Sr wrote:

<quoted text>
I happen to know a few business owners who didn't read/hear it that way at all. You're not good at objective, are you?(Off the topic but why, exactly, do you have so much hate in you? Do you go to church?)
As a business owner, some of your success IS built upon the infrastructure (roads, internet, education) this great nation provides. It'd be a lot harder to sell widgets if I couldn't take orders online, or ship via rail or truck, or hire qualified widget assembly people. If Steve Jobs was born in Turkmenistan you'd have never heard of him.

Judged:

1

TGVR wrote:

<quoted text>
So I'm only objective if I view it the way you say it should be viewed? How is that objective? The preident nevr said "some." He said, and I quote "If you've got a business, you didn't build that." I'm sure(read the heavy sarcasm in that word) he didn't mean to say it that way(which is always the excuse when he says something stupid, which is becoming a prety regular occurance), but that's what he said. As far as infrastructure, that is one of the job expressly given to Congress to do. Even if there was no business ocuring in the United States Congress would be required to provide infrastructure. Is it necessary for business? Of course. Is it the sole reason anyone is successful in the business world? To even consider that is laughable. True to his philosophy, the president cannot envision a scenario where government is not 100% responsible for the success or failure of everything. He has continually showed an extreme lack of economic knowledge, and a disdain for those who have that knowledge and use it to become successful. If you're looking for someone overcome with hate, look at the president, he hates business owners because they became successful without the government propping them up.

Joe Yule Sr wrote:

[QUOTE who="Really? "]Romney may not be PERFECT, but he is at least a million times better than the socialist we have in the White House now. At least he wants to help our country instead of run it in the ground. "

Whee! Fun with buzzwords. Socialist? You say that like it's a bad thing. We've been moving in a socialist direction for almost 100 years now. I sort of wonder if that's the natural progression of democratic governments... Anybody study up on that in college?

As for running into the ground, we have politicians on both sides of the aisle to thank for that. Obama hasn't done this single-handedly. Nor is the phenomena unique to his presidency.

Judged:

1

Joe Yule Sr wrote:

<quoted text>
Whee! Fun with buzzwords. Socialist? You say that like it's a bad thing. We've been moving in a socialist direction for almost 100 years now. I sort of wonder if that's the natural progression of democratic governments... Anybody study up on that in college?
As for running into the ground, we have politicians on both sides of the aisle to thank for that. Obama hasn't done this single-handedly. Nor is the phenomena unique to his presidency.

TGVR wrote:

<quoted text>
Historically speaking democracies last about 200-250 years before they collapse upon themselves because of the problems liberal progressives heap on them. Taxing the rich to fund social welfare and people feeding off the government teat has brought down every democracy in the history of the world. It happens that way because people like Barack Obama and other progressives refuse to learn from history, thus they are doomed to repeat it. And their ilk will drag the rest of us down with them.

Joe Yule Sr wrote:

<quoted text>
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
Watch this and see if you feel the same way.

Joe Yule Sr wrote:

<quoted text>
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
Watch this and see if you feel the same way.

Judged:

1

1

1

Wait a minute wrote:

<quoted text>
Yup, they both cut up each others words. So does that make one better than the other? They both are trying to make the other look bad. IMO Mitt wins!!

Judged:

1

1

1

Ernest Evans wrote:

<quoted text>
I think the point being here that Obama did not state that folks can't claim credit for building their businesses. You have to acknowledge the infrastructure this great nation provides. I heard Obama speak the words first (channel 124 on XM radio, folks!) so when I read the words I knew what context they were spoken in. Didn't realize until later that it wasn't so clear when reading the transcript.
Shame on Mitt though. Although I think he's a flawed candidate, I really thought he had a bit more integrity than that.

Judged:

1

1

1

Ernest Evans wrote:

<quoted text>
I think the point being here that Obama did not state that folks can't claim credit for building their businesses. You have to acknowledge the infrastructure this great nation provides. I heard Obama speak the words first (channel 124 on XM radio, folks!) so when I read the words I knew what context they were spoken in. Didn't realize until later that it wasn't so clear when reading the transcript.
Shame on Mitt though. Although I think he's a flawed candidate, I really thought he had a bit more integrity than that.

Judged:

1

Whitegirl wrote:

The GOTP are funny...they want us to move on from this...yet, did they move on from the Rev. Wright issue when Obama was running for President...or...look how much time they spent on the Birther Issue while the President was trying to save this country from going over the cliff...
NOPE...not going to do it...as long as Romney doesn't come clean, this is an issue that will be talked about day after day...all of the way to November 6, 2012, if necessary...
Show us your TAX returns Mitt!!!

POLEMICS wrote:

It boils down to do you think business needs protection from the People or do the People need protecting from business. I have no objection to a little Capitalism as long as we have a benevolent Government to control what and how they produce as well as prices, wages & profit.
The old idea of the first order of business being profit rather than to benefit the masses has got to go.

POLEMICS wrote:

It boils down to do you think business needs protection from the People or do the People need protecting from business. I have no objection to a little Capitalism as long as we have a benevolent Government to control what and how they produce as well as prices, wages & profit.
The old idea of the first order of business being profit rather than to benefit the masses has got to go.

POLEMICS wrote:

It boils down to do you think business needs protection from the People or do the People need protecting from business. I have no objection to a little Capitalism as long as we have a benevolent Government to control what and how they produce as well as prices, wages & profit.
The old idea of the first order of business being profit rather than to benefit the masses has got to go.

Judged:

1

1

1

Whitegirl wrote:

Its not going away. Think of how long the birther baloney has gone on without a single document, quote or iota of evidence. In fact all the documentation showed the President was born in Hawaii. All of it. Now, all of the evidence about Romney & Bain proves he either lied or misled the SEC. You just can't have it both ways. Seems to be Karma for the swift boating of Kerry. Karma, baby.