The Gathering of Malcontents and Anarchists

The NATO Summit that going to be held in Chicago on May 20 and 21st. 2012 is a major happening for Malcontents and Anarchists of the world to show mainly just how dissatisfied with the fact that they aren't in control as yet of the world.
They can't understand why the world hasn't bowed to their superior collective intellectual wisdom and leaped to accommodate the changed that they envision as so necessary for a progressive and just world government.
Genius isn't always recognized as such,but Malcontents and Anarchists are much easier revealed for what they are.
They are easily recognized by the fact that this motley melange of Malcontents and Anarchists have the same goals which is to obtain a larger piece of the industerious, the achievers pie which they feel is owed to them just by the fact,well,... they they just want their share without having done anything to have earned a right to a piece of that pie.
Michelle Obama once said "...someone is going to have to give up a piece of their pie so that someone else can have more."
Missing from Michelle Obama's fine sentiments about giving up a piece of someone's pie so others could have more was that those who were willing to take a piece of someone elses pie should be required to contribute themselves to society before they were entitled to eat the products of others labors.
Subject....The Gathering of Malcontents and Anarchists by Johnny Appleseed on the Oswego Forum....Friday, May 18, 2012
If these Malcontents and Anarchists efforts and goals are so noble why do they have to hide their idenity of who they are behind masks,and masking their objective behind grandiose admirable sounding titles such as,
"Committee Against Political Repression"
"Global Reach, Inc."
"Area Peace Action"
"Committee to Stop FBI Repression"
"Students for a Democratic Society"
"Immigrant Rights Activist"
"Episcopalian Peace Fellowship"
Why are these Malcontents and Anarchists hiding behind face masks,did Mother Teresa feel the need to wear a mask over her face or was she proud of what she was doing,did Mahatma Gandhi hide behind a mask while protesting for his ideas.
"By their works you shall know them" perhaps best explains the need for masks these Malcontents and Anarchists always wear.... their works don't allow them to take pride in what they are doing.

Johnny Appleseed wrote:

The NATO Summit that going to be held in Chicago on May 20 and 21st. 2012 is a major happening for Malcontents and Anarchists of the world to show mainly just how dissatisfied with the fact that they aren't in control as yet of the world.
They can't understand why the world hasn't bowed to their superior collective intellectual wisdom and leaped to accommodate the changed that they envision as so necessary for a progressive and just world government.

Sounds like a meeting of the Tea Party. One far left. One far right.

Eric wrote:

<quoted text>
Sounds like a meeting of the Tea Party. One far left. One far right.

You are such a predictable moron.
These protesters are just like yor buddy Obama, spread the wealth by government redistribution.
No need to work or produce anything, just take it from those who have.

kelsey wrote:

<quoted text>
You are such a predictable moron.
These protesters are just like yor buddy Obama, spread the wealth by government redistribution.
No need to work or produce anything, just take it from those who have.

Explain how the part of Johnny's post that I quoted differs from what the Tea Party does and says. Both hold massive rallys. Both want change from existing practices. Both want the current people in charge to be replaced by people who believe as they do. The only difference is one is far right, and one is far left.

kelsey wrote:

<quoted text>
You are such a predictable moron.
These protesters are just like yor buddy Obama, spread the wealth by government redistribution.
No need to work or produce anything, just take it from those who have.

Your appraisal of Eric is very true, Eric, with his tunnel-vision only sees what eric chooses to see in Obama,Eric won't let reality get in the way of his tunnel-vision.

Johnny Appleseed wrote:

<quoted text>Your appraisal of Eric is very true, Eric, with his tunnel-vision only sees what eric chooses to see in Obama,Eric won't let reality get in the way of his tunnel-vision.

I haven't even mentioned the President. I was comparing your analysis of the protestors with what the Tea Baggers do. It's the same. Someone once said that there was little difference between the far right and the far left, and this proves it. Everything you said about the Nato Protestors applies equally to the Tea Baggers.

By the way, please notice that I didn't disagree with your analysis.

Eric wrote:

<quoted text>
I haven't even mentioned the President. I was comparing your analysis of the protestors with what the Tea Baggers do. It's the same. Someone once said that there was little difference between the far right and the far left, and this proves it. Everything you said about the Nato Protestors applies equally to the Tea Baggers.
By the way, please notice that I didn't disagree with your analysis.

You didn't mention Obama but your tunnel-vision applies to everything in the way you see things and your predictable reactions.

Eric wrote:

<quoted text>
I haven't even mentioned the President. I was comparing your analysis of the protestors with what the Tea Baggers do. It's the same. Someone once said that there was little difference between the far right and the far left, and this proves it. Everything you said about the Nato Protestors applies equally to the Tea Baggers.
By the way, please notice that I didn't disagree with your analysis.

You replied," I was comparing your analysis of the protestors with what the Tea Baggers do..." I never made that comparison between protestors and the Tea Party,the comparison you made was only a diversionary tactic...there isn't any comparison between the two... the Tea Party has the best interests of the country and its people.... the protestors interests, on the other hand are in disrupting and tearing down the republic form of government we now have and replacing it with a communist or socialist form of government...there isn't any comparison between the two that can be legitimately made.

Johnny Appleseed wrote:

<quoted text>there isn't any comparison between the two... the Tea Party has the best interests of the country and its people.... the protestors interests, on the other hand are in disrupting and tearing down the republic form of government we now have and replacing it with a communist or socialist form of government...there isn't any comparison between the two that can be legitimately made.

That's only because you agree with the politics of the Tea Baggers and don't agree with the politics of the NATO protestors. They are both out of touch with the majority of America. One too far left; one too far right. Otherwise they both want to impose their ways on the country. Thankfully, neither have been successful.

Save your Breath Eric......These Lunkheads are Shallow, Mean, Very Lonely People who have no real purpose in life except to take dumps in America's Lunchbox. With no real power they dribble on with racist spews that come from their very cold indifferent hearts that do nothing but divide. They are not on a fact finding mission nor a track to solutions. I pitty this Clod Headed Dweebs....

tripnic wrote:

Save your Breath Eric......These Lunkheads are Shallow, Mean, Very Lonely People who have no real purpose in life except to take dumps in America's Lunchbox. With no real power they dribble on with racist spews that come from their very cold indifferent hearts that do nothing but divide. They are not on a fact finding mission nor a track to solutions. I pitty this Clod Headed Dweebs....

spewing such venomous Verbiage... Did you sit in the same church pew with Obama, Reverend Wright who said," "not God Bless America," no, no,... God Damn America"
then Rodney King’s plea,"Can't we all just learn to get along"

The Jester wrote:

The Tea Party: Thousands of hard-working middle-class FOX News viewers fighting to make sure millionaires pay lower taxes.

Truer words have never been said.

As with most political class struggles, each side has part of the truth, but they talk past each other.

The left says it isn't fair that millionaires pay a lower share of their income than the middle class. They're correct. The right says that raising taxes on investment stifles job creation. They're also correct.

The real problem lies in the way the tax break for capital gains is structured: you get to pay lower taxes whether the investment is actual or financial. Allow me to explain the difference...

An actual investment creates jobs. It builds factories, buys equipment, or hires additional workers. Actual investments give a company money they can use to further our collective economic growth.

A financial investment buys a piece of paper. No jobs are created, as none of the money exchanging hands goes to a company producing goods or services. If you own stock that you paid $2 for, and I give you $5 for it, you've made a capital gain - but the company that we're trading doesn't see a dime of it.

If we modify the capital gains tax rate to include only direct investment in companies (initial IPO issues of stock, initial sales of bonds, direct investment in small business by the owners, and the purchase of treasury stock directly from corporations) we would encourage job-creating actual investment.

Excluding tax breaks for financial instruments traded on secondary markets would recognize the legitimate concerns of those on both sides of the issue, while sidestepping much of the political rhetoric.

The Jester wrote:

The Tea Party: Thousands of hard-working middle-class FOX News viewers fighting to make sure millionaires pay lower taxes.

you replied," Thousands of hard-working middle-class FOX News viewers fighting to make sure millionaires pay lower taxes..." To paraphrase what you said,....Lets tax the S### out of the Millionaire business owners where those "Thousands of hard-working middle-class..."people earn their living so that they become so unprofitable that they can't keep their doors open and those "Thousands of hard-working middle-class workers lose their jobs, their homes,Businesses move over seas etc... Thats teaching those greedy millionairs a lesson.

Man, didn't the Chicago police do a fantastic job this weekend? Hat's off to them!

Eric wrote:

Man, didn't the Chicago police do a fantastic job this weekend? Hat's off to them!

Yes the CPD did a very good job. Good training exercise.

Now you need to name one "tea party" group that attempted to cause such mayhem that people actually stayed away from work. Or cost taxpayers money and local businesses money by their assemblance?

All thesee "protesters" did was make ass clowns of themselves. Whatever they were intending to accomplish was a complete FAIL.

Me in Hellinois wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes the CPD did a very good job. Good training exercise.
Now you need to name one "tea party" group that attempted to cause such mayhem that people actually stayed away from work. Or cost taxpayers money and local businesses money by their assemblance?
All thesee "protesters" did was make ass clowns of themselves. Whatever they were intending to accomplish was a complete FAIL.

First, please remember that I didn't disagree with Johnny's original assessment.

Second, why do you think that Tea Bagger rallies don't cost the taxpayers money? Who do you think pays for the police crowd control during those rallies? I understand that there is a difference in level of cost, but there is still cost. The $14,000 paid by one city could have been used for something more beneficial, I'm sure.

Finally, some of the protestors--the more violent; the more radical--didn't get their message across. It was overshadowed by the method. Others did get their message across. Please remember the mass protest by the nurses for health care. The veterans for peace. Thousands who participated did so without adversity. The people who actually had the permits followed police orders throughout the weekend and asked others to do the same. Those who protested in mass but peacefully did get their message across. And, a lot of what got across and what didn't get across depended upon the media. I watched the live coverage of Sunday's protest and thought that the police had it rather well under control without a lot of injuries to anyone. But if you looked at the front pages of the Sun Times and Trib you would have thought that there were thousands injured and arrested.

Eric wrote:

<quoted text>
First, please remember that I didn't disagree with Johnny's original assessment.
Second, why do you think that Tea Bagger rallies don't cost the taxpayers money? Who do you think pays for the police crowd control during those rallies? I understand that there is a difference in level of cost, but there is still cost. The $14,000 paid by one city could have been used for something more beneficial, I'm sure.
Finally, some of the protestors--the more violent; the more radical--didn't get their message across. It was overshadowed by the method. Others did get their message across. Please remember the mass protest by the nurses for health care. The veterans for peace. Thousands who participated did so without adversity. The people who actually had the permits followed police orders throughout the weekend and asked others to do the same. Those who protested in mass but peacefully did get their message across. And, a lot of what got across and what didn't get across depended upon the media. I watched the live coverage of Sunday's protest and thought that the police had it rather well under control without a lot of injuries to anyone. But if you looked at the front pages of the Sun Times and Trib you would have thought that there were thousands injured and arrested.

"tea bagger rallies" ???? you are missing a crucial and very important point.

When oh when, has a local government - be it a town, village or city EVER had to enact rules of engagement against any "tea party rally" ???

I see the desperation now in your hijacked democratic party. They want to go back to those turbulent hippy times in the 60's Protests. Marches. Destruction. Victimization. Racism. Entitlement.

Some thiings like fashion platform heels may come back in style from time to time, but this BS will not be tolerated by the middle class of ths country any longer. We are done with the hope and change BS

Me in Hellinois wrote:

<quoted text>

I see the desperation now in your hijacked democratic party. They want to go back to those turbulent hippy times in the 60's Protests. Marches. Destruction. Victimization. Racism. Entitlement.

Why are you associating all of this with the Democrats? The anarchists were protesting a Democratic president in a Democratic city. These people have no real politics.

Eric wrote:

<quoted text>
Why are you associating all of this with the Democrats? The anarchists were protesting a Democratic president in a Democratic city. These people have no real politics.

We can be pretty sure that those protestors weren't republicans, their party affiliations are pretty well known.
You can run eric, but you can't hide, you are one, as the democrat party is, with those liberal/ leftist/Anarchists protestors.