Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Judged:

1

1

1

lil Lily wrote:

<quoted text>
Anyone who can read for comprehension understands what I say, and doesn't use excuses as to why they wouldn't.
Perhaps if you had an adult intelligence, you wouldn't struggle so much to understand.

Judged:

1

1

sassychic wrote:

<quoted text>WOW. Just WOW.

A FULL TERM BORN BABY that needs a respirator isn't viable.

*sigh*

Judged:

1

pupsilicious wrote:

<quoted text>Never said that. animals have a different soul than we do, after all we are human and animals aren't. Get your pedicure ladi?

realkatie wrote:

<quoted text>
Hey La!!
LOL :)
TGIF!

Brilliant_Chicky wrote:

<quoted text>
Right. She thinks that a 19 year old man knocking up a 15 year old that show up at PP for an abortion is a pedophile who should be arrested but her boyfriends weren't pedophiles because she was mature when she started having sex with men at 13. Yes and her dad was a monster for beating her for refusing to abort but the boyfriends that actually aborted her precious offspring were her wonderful lovers and were never called monsters. Yup Lynnie is effed up big time.

Judged:

2

2

1

STO wrote:

<quoted text>
No. You said the infant could not survive independently.
sassychic wrote:
<quoted text> The baby can't survive independently.Period. "
"Period". That means, no matter what, including using any medical means available.
You should try following your own posts. Not fair you trying to make me responsible for your words.

Judged:

1

1

1

Kenose wrote:

<quoted text>
You're such an idiot. You're a walking contradiction.
You say humans have souls and animals don't.
You obviously fail to recognize that humans are animals known as mammals.

Judged:

1

1

1

Brilliant_Chicky wrote:

<quoted text>
Viable means able to live. If it can't live it isn't viable.

Judged:

2

2

2

STO wrote:

<quoted text>
You are lying. I never posted "baby that needs support is not viable". Nope.
I'd challenge you to find the post with that quote but we both know it's not there, so let's just agree you're lying. As usual.

Judged:

2

2

2

elise in burque wrote:

<quoted text>People who commit ritualistic animal abuse tend to go on to commit violence toward people. Women who have abortions and physicians who perform the procedure are not psychotic, no matter what you may think of them. You really don't know much, do you?

Judged:

2

2

2

STO wrote:

<quoted text>
At 10 weeks, it is not an infant. It's a fetus (barely). How far back do you want to go? 3 weeks? 3 weeks gestation = viable infant IF technology can gestate it? C'mon.
If the preemie has no chance of surviving outside the womb due to lack of development, it is not viable.

Judged:

2

2

1

lil Lily wrote:

I noticed Chicky is MIA since being hammered from at least 3 directions with the facts about RvW defining viability, and Katie stopped posting in support of Chicky's stupidity about viability.

Seems the PCers are using their personal off topic and unsubstantiated attacks to distance the thread from Chicky's and Katie's ignorance and stupidity about viability.

The patterns of behavior from the PC here are always the same.

Judged:

2

2

1

pupsee wrote:

<quoted text>
Hey, dipstick ?!... this animal abuser murdered a HUMAN BEING, then dismembered him, and sent his foot to the PC Party in Canada and his hand was en route to the Liberal party ..
Ah, that is right, this victim was BORN !! So, to YOU, who cares ..
Animal abuse is right up there with abortion in my eyes .. Don't like it, TUFF SH*T !!

Judged:

1

1

1

Brilliant_Chicky wrote:

<quoted text>
Listen, you raving defective, for like the hundredth time, unlike YOU, I DONT LIVE HERE. Unlike YOU, I have a life, a few jobs, and a family that doesn't run screaming in the opposite direction when they see me coming.
You are a gibbering moron who could NEVER even come close to disproving anything I've ever said. E.V.E.R and the only hammering you've ever been involved in was from your many lowlife boyfriends who freely hammered you in various ways. Who undoubtedly had to be hammered in order to muster interest in such a skanky mess.
But you keep right on pretending that your unsupportable, intellectually oblivious and factually vacuous OPINION means anything outside of your own tiny, twisted, mind. Why should you have to deal in reality now? I'm sure it's the only thing that keeps you from killing yourself. Your reality must be unbearable. I'd deny it all too, if I were as unfortunate and stupid and as full of rancid shyt as you!!

Ocean56 wrote:

<quoted text>
lol Coming from an anti-choice IMBECILE like you, that's hilarious. You're precisely the sort of "man" that smart women are wise to AVOID.

Judged:

2

2

2

LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:

<quoted text>
I did not at ANY time say that I havent had a drink in over 20 years. I was responding to your lies claiming I use drugs.

Judged:

1

1

1

knitandpraysiliscious wrote:

<quoted text>
Classic case of backpeddling.

Judged:

3

2

2

John-K wrote:

<quoted text>
I think you do a disservice to women with this point of view "Sass."
Men are the perpetually horny--and predatory sex(which isn't an untruth I freely admit,) while women, if they happen to be PC, are simple-minded, cow-eyed, warm bodies willing to submit to the man's advances, or else they're hedonistic sluts with no sense of self-worth, or responsibility?
I think that "Kathwynn" was quite correct when he said that there are some people who view the world through a "black-and-white" perspective.
"Sass," I realize you and I have got points of view regarding this subject that are irreconcilable.
I've long since stopped trying to get to you look beyond your own yardsticks as I've realized such an endeavor is utterly fruitless.
The main point of contention we have is this:
You want others to respect your system of beliefs...fair enough.
The part we take issue with is that you don't respect the fact that there are those who don't share your system of beliefs, and you feel there's nothing wrong with trying to legislatively impose those beliefs onto the rest of us.

Judged:

1

1

1

SassyJM wrote:

<quoted text> Your friends here SUPPORT humans being dismembered www.abortionno.org
Some even paid a Dr to dismember and kill their own.
You are discussing this animal abuser sicko who killed another human by dismembering another innocent person?
Really?
Odd.

Judged:

1

1

1

LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:

<quoted text>
I did not claim that. COMPREHENSION Skankdawg.
I was never an alcoholic, drinking was NEVER an issue for me in any way, thus whether I have a drink at dinner is irrelevant. I've been clean from drugs for OVER 20 years.
You can stop lying anytime now Skankdawg.