Polk County deputy airlifted

LOKEL wrote:

Speeding is not an authorized use of force.

MurphyMobile wrote:

<quoted text>
He is just jealous that he cannot speed like that officer did.
And he does not know the entire story.
The break-in could have been a family member, a wife, a friend or a complete stranger.
It does not matter what you think, lokel.
He was doing what he enjoys the most, being an
LEO.
So next time your inside your home and someone
is breaking in carrying an arsenal, DO NOT CALL
911 or get out your weapons. Just let the person
do his thing. You will be screwed for sure.

LOKEL wrote:

Speeding is not an authorized use of force.

Asheville_Native wrote:

<quoted text>
He was doing his job trying to protect a citizen with some thug breaking into her house. Next time you need a cop in a hurry you would be having a fit if they drove the speed limit, followed slower traffic, stopped at all red lights while some thug is thumping on your sorry butt.

Carolinakat wrote:

<quoted text>
Mabey we should do away with all LEO's and all laws. Make everyone fend for themselves. Is that what you are saying? Have you ever put your life on the line for the safety of another? If not, then keep your yap shut.

mlc9852 wrote:

<quoted text>
Because of out of control speeding cops, my husband was almost killed. I'll say what I feel like. If you don't like it, don't read it.

Dunnin wrote:

<quoted text>
mlc, have you ever considered just how smart that decision MIGHT not be?
IF your husband and his lawsuit is even granted a trial here, ever thought that people that might be on the jury might read your hateful and spite-filled rants toward law officers on here?
It would be enough for me (if I were on the jury) NOT to give you a dime. Of course, as stated many times previously, I wouldnt give you a dime anyway. Not because your husband deserves no compensation, he does. YOU ARE SUEING the wrong PEOPLE!!
Cops didnt hit your husband. The lowlife fool running from the cops did. A detail you always forget to mention in your rants.
IF your husband were to sue the slimeball that actually hit him and I was on the jury, I would give him good compensation.
I am sure Im not the only one who thinks this way, but carry on.

Fed Up-CH wrote:

Ex-husband*

mlc9852 wrote:

<quoted text>
We expect to settle before trial but if not, we would obviously ask for a change of venue.

mlc9852 wrote:

<quoted text>
We expect to settle before trial but if not, we would obviously ask for a change of venue.

Fed Up-CH wrote:

<quoted text>
I'd love for it to go to trial. Why do you think you'd deserve a change of venue?

Dunnin wrote:

<quoted text>
Obviously, you WISH to settle before trial. I think the taxpayer's should have a say in this. Sue the right person, mlc and no one will have a problem with compensating your then "estranged" and now still married husband.
Why should you be granted a change of venue? Is it because your lawyer is antsy about people around here recognizing that the cops actually didnt hit your husband, the scumbag did?
Do you honestly believe that the lawyers for the cops (county and state) will forget to enlighten another jury in another location of this fact? I would bet money that they dont.

Larry W Whitt wrote:

<quoted text>
ah, " for better or worse, sickness and in health " really mattered to you, eh ???
only sticking around until the settlement were ya ???
gold diggin biatch.....

mlc9852 wrote:

<quoted text>
Why do you care?