Obama's 4th of July - U.S. is $14.5 Trillion in Debt

Stop Him Now wrote:

July 4th, 2009, Obamites drown America in $14.5 TRILLION in debt.

Judged:

1

gforce wrote:

<quoted text> You forgot to mention the 10% unemployment.

Judged:

1

1

1

Random Damage wrote:

<quoted text>
You still haven't got that fry cook job yet? How sad. You're so very talented at doing exactly what others tell you to with no notion of original thought-you'd be perfect for it.

Judged:

1

1

1

gforce wrote:

<quoted text> There's more integrity in a fry cook than a lawyer. Fry cooks don't steal from people. How's your pro la raza, pro ACLU, pro NAMBLA buddy Sonia Sotomayor doing? What other low life groups does she represent? Who's she giving BJ's too?

Random Damage wrote:

<quoted text>
And I'm still waiting for your proof of Sotomayer's constant reversals; think you could get that to me soon? Remember?

Judged:

1

1

1

Dallas wrote:

<quoted text>
Here's one....
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31609275/
I don't know if it means that much in that Judge Sotomayor would be replacing Justice Souter who was in the minority of the decision.

Random Damage wrote:

<quoted text>
One? How about the remainder of the decisions that are, in gfarce's words, "constantly overturned". Keep digging.
Gfarce? You have another fighting your battles for you now?

Dallas wrote:

By the way ---total overturned is 3. Here they are.
http://www.newsweek.com/id/199955

Dallas wrote:

By the way ---total overturned is 3. Here they are.
http://www.newsweek.com/id/199955

Random Damage wrote:

<quoted text>
Wow, up to 3. I think at last count, she's written 232 opinions. Yeah, that 3 is a big dent.

Judged:

1

1

1

gforce wrote:

Here's some cases involving Sotomayor that were reviewed by the Supreme Court.
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/05/...

Dallas wrote:

<quoted text>
Three in addition to the recent Firefighter case.
1. She ruled that a prison inmate had the right to sue a contractor - overturned by another 5-4 - not founded in law.
2. She ruled that the EPA could not use a cost-benefit analysis to determine the best technology to draw cooling water in to power plants --overturned 6-3 - she had determined that the methods impacted marine life and but BACT had been on the books since the early 1990's.
3. The third - quoted to be kind a fundamental intrepretation of law which was overturned 8-0 in ruling that a class action suit could be brought to court in violation of the 1998 Securities Litigation Act.
Just the facts....so, do those 3 (now 4) overturns mean that she is not qualified to be a Supreme Court Justice? No comment here, but there is a reason we have nine Supreme Court Justices not one.

Random Damage wrote:

<quoted text>
The reason? The Federal Judiciary Act called for a chief justice and five associate justices. The current lineup of eight associates and a chief didn't solidify until the late 1860s.

Judged:

1

1

1

Random Damage wrote:

<quoted text>
You still haven't got that fry cook job yet? How sad. You're so very talented at doing exactly what others tell you to with no notion of original thought-you'd be perfect for it.

Judged:

1

1

1

mrkihn wrote:

<quoted text>
You can tell by his comment he isn't smart enough for that type of job.