Texas biology professors see little controversial about evolution

And Casey Luskin, of the Discovery Institute has a problem with the survey's methodology. His recent whine is that only half those surveyed responded. Why am I not surprised.

Umm, would someone explain statistics to the DI's Boy Blunder.

Let me whip out my Crystal Ball and his next whine will be that they only sent the survey to Biologists! gee, who else would they send it to? I guess he wants theologians to respond to offer a 'balanced' view. I think we all know what the DI's idea of balanced is -- Tilted in their direction -- anything else is 'obviously' faulty.

What the survey does is confirm that there is no scientifically-based controversy over Evolution and Evolutionary Theory. Yet Casey is the one claiming the survey substitutes politics for science. Hmmm, who is the group with a purely political agenda? The DI of course. And why is their agenda pure politics? Because they have no scientific legs to stand on.

How many other theories are they going to analyze the "strengths and weaknesses" of?

I get a kick out of this so many theories but only one that has "strengths and weaknesses"

OMG the G would be for the god THOR.