Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Judged:

1

1

1

Tom Tom wrote:

<quoted text>
Agree, although not a Catholic, I think it is obvious the Catholic schools do a much better job than the public schools of educating our children.
..

Judged:

1

1

pupsilicious wrote:

<quoted text>Not where I live, they are flourishing. Some are even expanding.

Judged:

1

1

1

Tom Tom wrote:

<quoted text>
Agree, although not a Catholic, I think it is obvious the Catholic schools do a much better job than the public schools of educating our children.
They are not only more book smart, they are given a moral compass for life. That irritates the Hell out of the heathen pagans but that is too bad. If the pagans had their way children would just be wild animals doing what they wanted, without any sense of morality.
I am very happy that there are these type of schools. They are not just Christian but of other Faiths as well. They beat the pagan secularism that is being shoved down the throats of our young. It can be evidenced by the stupid things said by the proabort pagans on this site.

Judged:

1

1

1

Tom Tom wrote:

<quoted text>
Oh here we go again from the old wannabe lesbian. "If not for this kid, I could have been a dancer". Do you have any other follow up material. Yes we get it. You hate the fact you are a woman, you hated being pregnant, you hate men, you hate Churches, you hate the fact you ended up a mother. Oh and you also hate women who love being mothers.
There isn't enough money in the world to pay for the therapy your kid is going to need after having to grow up with such a "loving " proabort mother as you, pagan!

Judged:

1

1

1

LadiLulu wrote:

<quoted text>
a) Catholic schools are closing across the country. "Agree" all you want. She's completely wrong and in denial. Those are the facts.
b) Your last sentence is a grammatical mess. Clearly YOU are not the best arbiter of educational standards/achievement.

Judged:

1

1

1

Badaxe wrote:

<quoted text>Apparently you do not understand the significance of a "decision". It includes how they reached their conclusions, and facts considered, so that it may be challenged when "facts" used to reach such a decision become irrelevant or outdated. A SCOTUS decision is precedence to other decisions, but "how" they reached the decision (which is part of the decision) is relevant to challenges as well. Roe v Wade's definition of "viable" is loose enough that it will probably never be over turned, but it's suggestion that "viable" be as early as 24 weeks may be challenged as medical technology advances, since it based it's arguments on available technology at the time. A "Decision" includes all considerations, opinions, and arguments in it's entirety.

Judged:

1

1

LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:

<quoted text>
ROFLMAO No its not. Its a school that teaches theology for any number of religions, including Judaism.

Judged:

1

1

1

Long Night Moon 13 wrote:

<quoted text>
The Catholic school in my hometown closed over 30 years ago. The building has since been used as town offices and the VNA. Only one child in our neighborhood had attended that school. Sadly her mother was a closet drinker and the loudmouth obnoxious B of the whole neighborhood. Her father was a decent guy who spent his life being verbally beaten down by his overbearing wife.

Judged:

1

1

1

Long Night Moon 13 wrote:

<quoted text>
LMAO!!! Yeah, Catholic schools are the very best when teaching useless crap like mythology and fables. Creationism? What a joke! Morals? You mean like pedophilia, corruption, subterfuge, misogyny and hypocrisy?

Judged:

1

1

elise in burque wrote:

<quoted text>Where do you live? I live in New Mexico... you know, Catholics Country. A lot of the adult children of Catholics here are moving away from the RCC and attending Evangelical/non-denominational churches.

Judged:

1

1

Tom Tom wrote:

<quoted text>
And more from the Christian hating proabort pagan. Wow, what else is new. You have a new pagan script there somewhere in your harry potter scrapbook?

Judged:

1

1

lil Lily wrote:

<quoted text>The facts are; what has been provided to you, and was even in the link you provided, was that the definition of viability was the medical definition used as the basis of the legal decision as to what states can and can't do, with regard to abortion. What you asked for and what you deny that we've provided is irrelevant to that fact.

The definition of viable" mentioned in RvW, "Physicians and their scientific colleagues have regarded [that event](<that event being quickening) with less interest and have tended to focus either upon conception, upon live birth, or upon the interim point at which the fetus becomes "viable," that is, potentially able to live outside the mother's womb, albeit with artificial aid. Viability is usually placed at about seven months (28 weeks) but may occur earlier, even at 24 weeks."

"...viable", that is [potentially able to live outside the mother's womb, albeit with artificial aid]."

That's the ONLY definition that matters with regard to the topic of legal abortion. That's the definition the SCOTUS judges used to base their decision as to states making abortion illegal if they so choose, and it's a fact not you or any other ignorant PC buffoon can dispute.

Kathy Boy is another joke, along with Katie and you. None of you knows anything about what you post about.

Judged:

1

1

lil Lily wrote:

Fact: "viability" of a fetus is about potentiality to live outside of the womb, "albeit with artificial aid."

Only mind bogglingly stupid people would dispute that fact, and only mind bogglingly stupid people have.

Judged:

1

1

LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:

<quoted text>Lynniekins, do yourself a favor. Get a thesaurus, so you dont look so fuckingmindbogglingly stupid AS WELL AS redundant AND moronic all the time. Better yet, get a life so you can stop coming to a board where nobody can stand your stupid ass and beating that same old dead horse for years on end. Seriously Lynne, you're sick. Seek help.

Badaxe wrote:

<quoted text>Are you obtuse? It's been posted a thousand times, your inability to understand doesnt equate to someone dodging the question. You have posted links to the R v W decision, do you even read the links you post? How is that my problem?

Badaxe wrote:

<quoted text>I have said that I agree with the "legal compromise" that Roe v Wade set forth, for the most part. I have never argued "fetal rights", and I dont argue that protection of a woman's health or life isn't more compelling than the State's interest to protect potential life. I have argued Doe v Bolton's definition of "health", but other than that I dont understand why you keep insinuating I am arguing things I'm not.
realkatie wrote, "<So when you're concerned with states interests' in "fetal rights" I am concerned with states interests in health and life of pregnant women because later abortions involve this -- not some chick waking up one day, deciding to get an abortion on a whim. Very few states have zero restrictions on abortion, especially late and later term.
"

Abortion laws are required to give precedence to the woman's health and life over the State's interest to protect "potential life". Late term abortions are allowed to protect the life of the mother, in every State, so what is your concern in proscribing abortion to prevent "some chick waking up one day, deciding to get an abortion on a whim" on a viable fetus?

Judged:

1

1

1

LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:

<quoted text>
Lynniekins, do yourself a favor. Get a thesaurus, so you dont look so fuckingmindbogglingly stupid AS WELL AS redundant AND moronic all the time. Better yet, get a life so you can stop coming to a board where nobody can stand your stupid ass and beating that same old dead horse for years on end. Seriously Lynne, you're sick. Seek help.

Judged:

1

1

1

Tom Tom wrote:

<quoted text>And more from the Christian hating proabort pagan. Wow, what else is new. You have a new pagan script there somewhere in your harry potter scrapbook?

Judged:

1

1

LadiLulu wrote:

<quoted text>
Here, John:
http://smithtown.patch.com/announcements/beco...
Maybe you can volunteer with the Skank. See her in "action". Pull the "spoons" out of the clients' mouths when she's done snow-balling them and indoctrinating them!

Judged:

1

1

cpeter1313 wrote:

Sadder than unrequited love? How about the syfy network's "original" movies? "Sharktopus", anyone?
<quoted text>