BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ... Full Story

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#95928 Aug 1, 2012
Terri Tanna wrote:
<quoted text>
YES -- I am saying you are ABSOLUTELY WRONG.
Not even close. Have you ever had dinner with him at his residence?
=
The residence of the Roman Catholic Archbishop of Chicago has for decades been located on the west side of Astor in the 1500 block.
BTW, how far is it from 22nd St. and Pulaski to Crawford and Cermak?
Siouxweety wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you ready to eat your lies, again?!
http://www.archchicago.org/about_us/archbisho...
I think you got her right between her four-eyes.

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

#95930 Aug 1, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Terri Tanna wrote:
<quoted text>
YES -- I am saying you are ABSOLUTELY WRONG.
Not even close. Have you ever had dinner with him at his residence?
=
The residence of the Roman Catholic Archbishop of Chicago has for decades been located on the west side of Astor in the 1500 block.
BTW, how far is it from 22nd St. and Pulaski to Crawford and Cermak?
<quoted text>
I think you got her right between her four-eyes.
Oh my!
Has she run off again?
My goodness.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#95931 Aug 1, 2012
Does anyone want to bet that CBS, and the other alphabet networks, will cover Friday's Same-Sex Kiss-In at Chick-fil-As?

CBS News Admits to Not Covering Chick-fil-a Appreciation Day---Wednesday, August 1, 2012 |
http://patriotupdate.com/videos/cbs-news-admi...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#95933 Aug 1, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Can you, or any other Libtard, tell us what Dan Cathy said that is HATE SPEECH?
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
I won't pretend to speak for any Liberals on the thread, but can you tell me whn it was that I accused Dan Cathy of engaging in hate speech? Or even made reference to him prior to this post?
No? Then F.O.
Oh, getting a little ovary, are we? Yep, the Polls do not look good gfor O'Bummer Boys and you Libtards are pinging off the walls.
American Lady

Danville, KY

#95936 Aug 1, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Tell us, American er hmm Lady. Are you freer than, say, Brits, French, Germans, Australians, New Zealanders, Japanese, Belgians, Dutch, Spaniards, Greeks, Italians, why, freer even than Canadians? What's this BS about this freedom which, according to you and your cut and paste, is so special, it's better than any other freedom?
American Exceptionalism
A Double Edged Sword
By Seymour Martin Lipset

Chapter One: Ideology, Politics, and Deviance

Born out of revolution, the United States is a country organized around an ideology which includes a set of dogmas about the nature of a good society. Americanism, as different people have pointed out, is an "ism" or ideology in the same way that communism or fascism or liberalism are isms. As G. K. Chesterton put it: "America is the only nation in the world that is founded on a creed. That creed is set forth with dogmatic and even theological lucidity in the Declaration of Independence...." As noted in the Introduction, the nation's ideology can be described in five words: liberty, egalitarianism, individualism, populism, and laissezfaire. The revolutionary ideology which became the American Creed is liberalism in its eighteenth- and nineteenth-century meanings, as distinct from conservative Toryism, statist communitarianism, mercantilism, and noblesse oblige dominant in monarchical, state-church-formed cultures.

Other countries' senses of themselves are derived from a common history. Winston Churchill once gave vivid evidence to the difference between a national identity rooted in history and one defined by ideology in objecting to a proposal in 1940 to outlaw the anti-war Communist Party. In a speech in the House of Commons, Churchill said that as far as he knew, the Communist Party was composed of Englishmen and he did not fear an Englishman. In Europe, nationality is related to community, and thus one cannot become un-English or un-Swedish. Being an American, however, is an ideological commitment. It is not a matter of birth. Those who reject American values are un-American.

The American Revolution sharply weakened the noblesse oblige, hierarchically rooted, organic community values which had been linked to Tory sentiments, and enormously strengthened the individualistic, egalitarian, and anti-statist ones which had been present in the settler and religious background of the colonies. These values were evident in the twentieth-century fact that, as H. G. Wells pointed out close to ninety years ago, the United States not only has lacked a viable socialist party, but also has never developed a British or European-type Conservative or Tory party. Rather, America has been dominated by pure bourgeois, middle-class individualistic values. As Wells put it: "Essentially America is a middle-class [which has] become a community and so its essential problems are the problems of a modern individualistic society, stark and clear." He enunciated a theory of America as a liberal society, in the classic anti-statist meaning of the term:

It is not difficult to show for example, that the two great political parties in America represent only one English party, the middle-class Liberal party.... There are no Tories ... and no Labor Party....[T]he new world [was left] to the Whigs and Nonconformists and to those less constructive, less logical, more popular and liberating thinkers who became Radicals in England, and Jeffersonians and then Democrats in America. All Americans are, from the English point of view, Liberals of one sort or another.... The liberalism of the eighteenth century was essentially the rebellion ... against the monarchical and aristocratic state--against hereditary privilege, against restrictions on bargains. Its spirit was essentially anarchistic--the antithesis of Socialism. It was anti-State.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/style/lo...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#95937 Aug 1, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
I know that no KKK or birther would want to keep it. I saw it. It's and attractive woman, and she is...black. That explains it.
Just Sayin wrote:
<quoted text>
If you call that attractive then I don't even want to imagine what your definition of ugly is.
Well, I do not find her attractive. Now Whitney Houston was. And Marilyn MaCoo was in her day (I have not seen recent pictures of her).
I saw the 5th Dimension in concert in 1976-77 but by then her and Billy Davis had left the group. But I did see Ike and Tina Turner's concert while they we still together and Tina was hot back then too.
Just Sayin

Toledo, OH

#95939 Aug 1, 2012
Terri Tanna wrote:
Terri Tanna wrote:
"ABSOLUTELY. DENIED IN TOTO.
"I have always described law student Obama's masterwork as his "magnum opus" -- a bound book with a distinctive cover -- that is found on the desk of EVERY trial lawyer in the United States."
====
<quoted text>
Yes, you and your ilk are filled with LIES about your president's background and educational accomplishments.
The original "birther" contention that, while Obama was President of the Law Review, he never published anything.
I pointed out years ago that such was a false and spurious claim, because as PRESIDENT (not as an Editor, which he also was) he published a book on the desk of every trial lawyer in the United States.
Watching you try and recover from your stupidity is astounding, not to mention comical.

I have watched you get away with degrading people on this thread for months only because you are good at lying which is par for the course with your ilk.

The Harvard Law Review would have been published with or without Obama. It is a well known fact among those who know, that the editor of the Review does not write anything. A duck could have been the president of the HLR and it would have still been published.

So since it would have been published with or without him how do you give credit to this being his "magnum opus"?

Everything the man has done has been from the work of others.

When he says "if you accomplished something it wasn't you who did that".

He is just referring to himself.
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#95940 Aug 1, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Can you, or any other Libtard, tell us what Dan Cathy said that is HATE SPEECH?

Oh, getting a little ovary, are we? Yep, the Polls do not look good gfor O'Bummer Boys and you Libtards are pinging off the walls.
That's what I expected. Called out for his lie Rouge Moron repastes his same tired crap
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#95941 Aug 1, 2012
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>If and when the uprising occurs, I think I'll head to IL and IN first.:)
Come on up. We offer free public schools. I know you need the book learnin

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

#95942 Aug 1, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Hey TerrI, Have you seen the latest Rasmussen poll? You probably have as you seeme xtra nasty today.
It suck to be a Progressive in 2012!
PLEASE no attacks -- after all I am a true ultra-conservative Republican.
=
CLASS, LET’S SALUTE rouge the rube!!
1. When he was five or six he began to attend a taxpayer-funded public school staffed by taxpayer-funded teachers and, perhaps, taxpayer-funded teachers’ aides.
2. When he was thirteen or fourteen he enrolled in a taxpayer-funded public high school staffed by taxpayer-funded teachers and coaches.
3. Sadly, rube was not very smart nor was he athletic or popular. He was not National Merit, a Westinghouse Science winner, National Honor Society, King of the Prom Court, an All-State athlete, a champion on the debate team, or the Editor of the public high school’s newspaper or yearbook. rube was a dreg – at the bottom of his very average class at a very average public high school.
4. In these rebellious adolescent years when many of his contemporaries were preparing themselves to enter the State University, the local juco (most of the class) or, in a few cases, selective private colleges, rube was crystallizing his deep antipathy toward authority: police officers, teachers, school administrators, judges, elected public officials, and, eventually, the highly-educated and courageous men and women patriots who are the senior officers in the United States military because of their rigorous education and training at this great country’s storied Service Academies at West Point, Annapolis, Colorado Springs, and even Kings Point and New London.
5. Having no future in college (not even an option) or the private business sector because of his abysmally low public high school class rank and SAT scores, rube took the easy way out.
6. For the next twenty-plus years he lived on the taxpayer-funded welfare rolls as a military grunt receiving a taxpayer-funded government handout for his compensation, his housing, his uniforms, his medical care, and his equipment. During these twenty-plus years he accomplished nothing of importance.
7. Finally, he bailed out of the military, so that he could receive a generous taxpayer-funded pension and taxpayer-funded VA medical and other taxpayer-funded welfare benefits.
8. Without any genuine skills he was reduced to employment as truck driver using the taxpayer-funded highways while he collected his taxpayer-funded military pension and taxpayer-funded VA medical and other taxpayer-funded welfare benefits.
9. Having reached that certain age rube began to draw on the taxpayer-funded social security system to supplement his taxpayer-funded military pension and taxpayer-funded VA medical and other taxpayer-funded welfare benefits.
IF THERE IS ANYTHING THE POSTERS ON THIS SITE ADMIRE ABOUT RUBE, IT IS HIS FIRM AND UNWAVERING OPPOSITION TO THOSE WHO SUCK ON THE TEAT OF THE TAXPAYER-FUNDED GOVERNMENT WELFARE ROLLS RECEIVING TAXPAYER-FUNDED HAND OUTS FOR DOING NOTHING.
Shame on President Obama for his support of entitlement programs including the “Affordable Care Act.”
.
Each day those who frequent this site should applaud and thank rube for his courageous opposition to liberal/Marxist big government spending on taxpayer-funded welfare programs.
HE IS A TRUE HERO TO EVERY TEA PARTY-LOVING CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICAN for his words as well as his actions.

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

#95946 Aug 1, 2012
Terri Tanna wrote:
"ABSOLUTELY. DENIED IN TOTO.
"I have always described law student Obama's masterwork as his "magnum opus" -- a bound book with a distinctive cover -- that is found on the desk of EVERY trial lawyer in the United States."
====
Yes, you and your ilk are filled with LIES about your president's background and educational accomplishments.
The original "birther" contention that, while Obama was President of the Law Review, he never published anything.
I pointed out years ago that such was a false and spurious claim, because as PRESIDENT (not as an Editor, which he also was) he published a book on the desk of every trial lawyer in the United States."
====
Just Sayin wrote:
The Harvard Law Review would have been published with or without Obama. It is a well known fact among those who know, that the editor of the Review does not write anything. A duck could have been the president of the HLR and it would have still been published.
So since it would have been published with or without him how do you give credit to this being his "magnum opus"?
How dense you must be. Obama was never the Editor-in-Chief of The Law Review; he was the President.
Why don't you tell the Class how their responsibilities differ.
Of course, The Law Review (that is, the quarterly journal) would have been published regardless of who was the President of The Law Review. After all, the students don't write the articles as you learned from one of my prior posts.
What your President was of FAR GREATER IMPORTANCE -- yet you are not smart enough to identify what that was. He was responsible for the magnum opus (a book that is completely independent of the quarterly journal) that is so important in The Law that it is found on the desk of EVERY trial lawyer in the United States. THAT was his great accomplishment as PRESIDENT (not as an Editor, which he also was) of The Law Review -- the oldest and most prestigious of all student-edited law journals in the United States.
Your appallingly limited knowledge of higher education generally, law schools in particular, and law journals in specific is apparent every time you make a fool of yourself by posting.
(You will recall that my late husband was also an Editor in Pres. Obama's 3L class.)

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

#95947 Aug 1, 2012
Just Sayin wrote:
Everything the man has done has been from the work of others.
Do you give Gen'l Eisenhower (a graduate of the distinguished service academy at West Point) any credit for the Allies' victory?

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

#95948 Aug 1, 2012
LRS wrote:
Oh, you misunderstood. I'm coming to teach!
But you still don't have your associates degree.

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

#95950 Aug 1, 2012
Terri Tanna wrote:
What possible adverse effect does "Obamacare" have on "job creation?"
LRS wrote:
Oh, about 21 new taxes.
Is it your contention those taxes will offset the multiplier effect on employment of the Affordable Care Act?
Do you claim the reason net unemployment was higher in Reagan's third year than in Obama's third year is because Reagan's marginal tax rate on middle income families was THREE TIMES AS HIGH as it is now under Obama?
Please do not answer in generalities. Instead be an adult and use hard and verifiable economic data from authentic sources. Thank you.
American Lady

Danville, KY

#95951 Aug 1, 2012
Insanity - tuna fish.....coming back for more "clobbering"....over and over and over and......

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

#95952 Aug 1, 2012
Just Sayin wrote:
Were you back from vacation when it was brought to our attention that Obama has been using a stolen Social Security number since 1977?
Can you tell the Class at what location and place that social security CARD was President Obama stole it by taking it and, presumably, putting it in his pocket?
Why was the owner of that social security card more careful about where s/he put it?

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

#95954 Aug 1, 2012
Terri Tanna wrote:
"Tell the Class specifically with what components of his economic policy you disagree, and the names of any economists who support your point of view. Thank you."
====
LRS wrote:
All the RED ink.
Have you always been an intellectual midget? Deficits -- assuming that is what you mean by "RED ink" -- are the RESULTS not the components of economic policy. Are you smart enough to name generically the principal components of macroeconomic policy?
=
Here is a challenge: The Class doesn't think you have the economic smarts to make a case against incurring a deficit in the circumstances the United States finds itself in 2012. Frankly, the Class doesn't think you have the economic smarts to make the case FOR surpluses. YOUR TURN -- GO!

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

#95957 Aug 1, 2012
Terri Tanna wrote:
YES -- I am saying you are ABSOLUTELY WRONG.
Not even close. Have you ever had dinner with him at his residence?
=
The residence of the Roman Catholic Archbishop of Chicago has for decades been located on the west side of Astor in the 1500 block.
====
Siouxweety wrote:
Are you ready to eat your lies, again?!
http://www.archchicago.org/about_us/archbisho...
#65,871
Siouxweety wrote:
His house was located right at Lasalle and North Avenue!
You are calling me a liar?
YES -- as your own site shows the address is 1555 North State Parkway. One cannot even see La Salle and North from the roof of the Cardinal's residence.
Maybe they moved his residence from LA SALLE AND NORTH all the way to STATE PARKWAY between the time you were there and now.(To be very clear the residence is bounded by State Parkway on the west and Astor (as I stated) on the east. What that has to do with LA SALLE STREET is beyond comprehension.

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

#95958 Aug 1, 2012
LRS wrote:
The national debt is now more than 100% GDP. Now, TT would have you believe this is a good economic plan (asinine). What it really is, is being OWNED. If China were to demand repayment, we couldn't do it. From there it would snowball and others would demand their money as well.
Once again the child who can't even complete an associate's degree exposes his ignorance of international monetary theory.
PLEASE explain how China can demand repayment when ONLY the United States can call the bonds. China's only recourse is to sell them on the open market to some other sucker such as yourself or rube ("mr. goldbug sucker").
=
OBAMA’S BIGGEST FINANCIAL SCAM

In order to give hard-working American families less expensive clothes and other non-food items, Wal-Mart buys consumer goods from China at very, very low prices, and pays for the purchases with good ol’ American dollars – the preferred currency among international traders around the world. Because of the very low prices, American consumers are BETTER OFF than before (with respect to the purchase of these goods).

Thus, China has excess U.S. dollars on hand and nothing to do with them.

So we make this deal with them: you give us back our dollars (in denominations of $TRILLIONS of dollars in return for little pieces of paper that say “IOU” for the same $Trillions of dollars with a balloon payment in thirty years and not one day before.

You might think China is too smart to fall for this SCAM but they do.

They simply ask that we pay them interest at the fixed rate of 2.54% per annum for thirty years. IF we do decide to pay the principal sum back in 2042, it will be with highly inflated dollars. Thus, OUR inflation will cause the loss of $billions of dollars to China.(Remember it’s a zero-sum game.) Pretty slick, huh?
This means that our new found cash cow (China) provides the United States with virtually unlimited borrowing power.
====
Now you probably think BORROWING is BAD, but watch this:
By spending more money than the federal government takes in by taxation and other revenue sources (creating a deficit of, say,$1 TRILLION a year or more) to buy votes through entitlement programs that are paid for with the dollars borrowed from China (not the U.S. taxpayers), the administration is able to have its cake and eat it also by (honestly) telling the American public that taxpayer money is NOT being used to fund entitlement programs to buy votes – all the money to pay for vote buying (welfare, food stamps, public housing, etc.) is being borrowed from our political enemies in China.

And if we decide to stiff them? What are they going to do? Sue us? Ha Ha Ha – LAUGHS ON THEM.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

RationalState

#95960 Aug 1, 2012
Conservative girl wrote:
<quoted text>Rubio was born in America. His parents were Cuban exiles who came to Florida in the 60s, applied for citizenship. They both are naturalized Americans as a result.
Rubio is a first generation natural born American,(parents were naturalized at the time of his birth), and his three children are 2nd generation natural born Americans eligible to be President or VP. That is how I interpet the Constitution regarding natural born citizen.
Wrong, as usual.

"On Sept. 9, 1975, Marco Rubio’s parents also petitioned for naturalization. Their petitions list the same date of admission to the United States as the petition of Rubio’s brother. It is unclear why Rubio’s parents waited 15 years to seek naturalization."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/marco-...

Marco Antonio Rubio (born May 28, 1971)

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 11 min Bluestater 1,153,944
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 2 hr Earthling-1 49,187
kalyan single jodi callll-08339890226 4 hr susil bhai 1
women are so shallow these days (Nov '11) 5 hr joey 86
428 homicides in 2013 5 hr joey 1
Music Artists A to Z (Feb '14) 9 hr Roxie Darling 361
Last word + 2 (Mar '12) 9 hr Roxie Darling 718
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 10 hr cheluzal 98,851
Chicago Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 11:17 am PST

NBC Sports11:17AM
T.Y. Hilton is questionable, but they're not ruling him out
Bleacher Report11:28 AM
Jay Cutler Rumors: Latest Details, Speculation on Bears QB's Future
Bleacher Report11:39 AM
Complete Week 16 Preview for Indianapolis
NBC Sports12:33 PM
1 thing even Rahm can't fix: Da Bears - NBC Sports
NBC Sports 1:01 PM
Cowboys' Murray listed as questionable for Colts - NBC Sports