BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

Johannes wrote:

<quoted text>
The posters from Yucaipa just might be me with different names.
I can say this....Yucaipa did not get snow on April 9, 2011....or June 9, 2011 as you previously said.
...and that would be California to all with any intelligence.

Then how come there are at least a half dozen sources that say it DID snow last April in Yucaipa, CA? Where you so afraid of that it might snow you hid in the basement until you had a report that it had all melted?

wojar wrote:

<quoted text>
Wow, Fox is fair and balanced because they say so.
And Pravda always disseminated the truth?

I said that FOX News is NOT objective. Why did you cut out that part of my post?

Is it that you want to argue so badly that you'll be deceptive if you have to?

Here's the line you cut out:

"Meanwhile, you are correct in pointing out that FOX News is not objective despite their claim to be."

I accept your apology.

"The FOX News Channel (FNC) is a 24-hour general news service devoted to delivering fair and balanced coverage of the day's events."

http://press.foxnews.com/corporate-info

I accept your retraction in advance. Thank you!

John wrote:

Depends on which site your looking at. There are 100s saying in was court ordered.

IT ABSOLUTELY DOES NOT DEPEND ON THE SITE. There is only ONE rule, and the reason that "birther"-losers are losers is because they have no idea where to find the TRUTH.
Rule 770.
"No motion for transfer to inactive status may be granted EXCEPT by Order of the Supreme Court and, then, only when no disciplinary charges are pending or about to be brought against the attorney."
How pathetic to be as ignorant and uneducated as you are.

HighlyEvolved wrote:

<quoted text>
Odd that your screen name is "Learn to Read" considering that you're apparently unable to read this:
"Media Matters for America — a progressive, Washington-based, nonprofit research and information center dedicated to comprehensively monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the U.S. media."
http://mediamatters.org/p/about_us/jobs/resea...
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but wherein does it state that MediaMatters is objective? Clearly they identify themselves as progressive, and they state their agenda in plain English.
Meanwhile, you are correct in pointing out that FOX News is not objective despite their claim to be:
"The FOX News Channel (FNC) is a 24-hour general news service devoted to delivering fair and balanced coverage of the day's events."
http://press.foxnews.com/corporate-info
I accept your retraction in advance. Thank you!

And another pathetic Birfoon proves that they can't read ... what part of "PRETENDING to be objective" did you find most confusing? I pre-acknowledge your ignorant rant in response ...

Obama Gonna Lose wrote:

The burden of proving eligibility is on the candidate applying for the job.

FALSE, FALSE, FALSE. You cannot find your erroneous and stupid statement in any rule anywhere. Without an explicit rule you are full of shttttt.

John wrote:

We believe the issue is real and we are mad about it. You have nothing to be mad about. We are not attacking you. None of us would get the special treatment he is getting. He is not special. He is an American right? The constitution does not allow special rules for the president under law. He is subject to the same laws and rules as you and I supposedly.

How the “birther”-losers became IRRELEVANT
.
1. At the time Barack Obama became a possible candidate, the provocative question of whether he was a “natural-born American citizen” was raised. About 50% of American voters felt this was a legitimate question.
2. For the first time many Americans learned of this term and considered what was its meaning in the United States Constitution.
3. In response to the rumors and innuendo Obama released his Certificate of Live Birth (CoLB), and the Hawai’ian authorities confirmed that Obama was indeed born in Hawai’i in 1961. This put to rest the entire matter for about 90% of American voters.
4. Pulling the chain of the 10% whacko crowd, Donald Trump demanded to see the so-called “long form” birth certificate.
5. When it was released, 99.9% of American voters knew for certain that President Barack Obama was truly a “natural-born American citizen” within the meaning of that term in the United States Constitution.
6. While all the rest of America moved on to adult issues, a distinct minority (one person in backwater America) obsessed whether the seal on the birth certificates was raised or not raised. This childish obsession ignored the long-standing Rule of Law in the United States that a birth certificate has no bearing on presidential eligibility.
7. Another distinct minority (two people) childishly obsessed whether the universally admitted fact that Obama Sr. was NEVER an American citizen precluded the duly-elected President of the United States of America and the Commander-in-Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, from qualifying as a “natural-born American citizen.”
8. Over time some 95 federal and state court cases and complaints before administrative hearing officers irrevocably resolved ALL of the “birther”-loser issues in favor of our great nation’s President. This is the outcome our brilliant Founders and Framers intended.
9. While the three remaining “birther”-losers obsessed over trivial and irrelevant details, the irrebuttable proof that Barack Obama Jr. was fully and completely qualified under the United States Constitution to be president and was duly elected as such following strictly every provision in the Constitution was laid out in excruciating detail and with CONSTITUTIONAL LEGAL FINALITY on January 8, 2009. This is the outcome our brilliant Founders and Framers intended.
10. At noon on January 20, 2009, President-elect Barack Obama Jr. took the Oath of Office and became the President of the United States of America and every one of its citizens. Chief Justice John Roberts and out-going President George W. Bush each said to Mr. Obama,“Congratulations, Mr. President.”
11. At that moment the “birther”-loser movement and the three remaining ignorant and uneducated “birther”-losers were reduced to whining, blithering idiots stomping their little feet as would a three-year old child who didn’t get her way.
12. This is the outcome our brilliant Founders and Framers intended.

Rogue Scholar wrote:

<quoted text>
Then how come there are at least a half dozen sources that say it DID snow last April in Yucaipa, CA? Where you so afraid of that it might snow you hid in the basement until you had a report that it had all melted?

They don't have basements in Ca.
They have to hide in the nut bin.

Obama Gonna Lose wrote:

Irrelevant because you can't answer those questions or rebut the points made, got it.
What witness testified for Obama???[NOT A SINGLE ONE BECAUSE NONE WAS NEEDED UNDER THE FRCP (or equivalent).]
What did the Court hear or see from Obama???[ NOTHING BECAUSE NOTHING WAS REQUIRED UNDER THE FRCP.]

Why does everyone laugh and laugh at your ignorance and lack of educationt that you don't even know the meaning of demurrer and 12(b)(6)?

John wrote:

The citizen of this country "ARE" the militia.

But only when they are marshalled under the control of the big, big government to suprress and crush recalcitrant American citizens (tax protesters) as Geo. Washington (while President) did riding at the head of 15,000 armed militia troops in 1789.
We call other organized citizens bearing arms criminal mobs and gang-bangers.

Obama Gonna Lose wrote:

Felicito Papa testified, that when Obama’s alleged birth certificate was published and was downloaded and opened, using “Adobe Illustrator” computer program, it showed multiple layers.

HOW STUPID CAN YOU BE?
Have you read the complete transcript. Oily never moved (as she is required to do) that the hearing officer recognize Mr. Papa as an expert. The hearing officer was not going to do so sua sponte, so that left Papa babbling mere opinion testimony that the hearing officer ruled was TOTALLY LACKING in credibility.
NOW NAME FOR THE CLASS ANY COURT-QUALIFIED EXPERT WHO HAS FOUND THE BIRTH CERTIFICATES TO BE DEFICIENT, and produce ANY COURT CASE that holds a birth certificate has any bearing on presidential eligibilty.
If you cannot, it's time for you to go back to third grade recess on the playground.

Obama Gonna Lose wrote:

Your turn.
What witness testified for Obama???
What did the Court hear or see from Obama???

MY TURN -- as counsel I don't even have to show up in order to prevail under the 800-year tradition of Anglo-American jurisprudence governing demurrers and its 20th Century progeny, Rule 12(b)(6) and state court equivalents.
YOUR TURN -- HOW COME YOU ARE TOO STUPID TO UNDERSTAND THESE BASICS OF LAW?

Learn to Read wrote:

<quoted text>
Velcro? Birfoons are springing for Velcro? I would have guessed generic Duct tape (I mean haven't they sent all their serious coin to help fund Oily's vacations?)

Yep, one by one the trolls pop out from under their rocks just as soon as they heard that Dr. Taitz had filed an appeal. Whaz da matta boy, you worried?

Obama Gonna Lose wrote:

Why can't you name just ONE independent document expert that says Obama's long form birth certificate is authentic?

Why does anyone have to?
What part of demurrer are you too stupid to understand?

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:

And the beat goes on....!!!
Our appeal was timely filed in Fulton county GA Superior Court (election appeals are supposed to be filed in Fulton county Superior Court). The case was assigned to the Chief Judge Cynthia D. Wright
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/...
Posted on | February 13, 2012
Did you Libtards think we would just go away?

rouge, will that make the score ZERO-95 or ZERO-96? I've lost count.

Terri Tanna wrote:

<quoted text>
We call other organized citizens bearing arms criminal mobs and gang-bangers.

Of course you call call organized criminals crime mobs and gang-bangers. After all, you live in Chicagoland!!! And I am sure you know what a Chicago Typewriter is, don't you there Toots?

ENOCHS JUSTICE wrote:

"I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them."
George Mason
Co-author of the Second Amendment
during Virginia's Convention to Ratify the Constitution, 1788

Tell the Class why that was not codified.
Without that Mason's "opinion" carries no more force and effect in Law than does grandiose "birther"-loser's view of FRCP.

Old Goat wrote:

and Obama.

In Obama's case the Constitution was strictly adhered to, and his eligibility (and election) was determined with CONSTITUTIONAL LEGAL FINALITY on Jan. 8, 2009.
Why is it that you are too stupid to even know what I am referring to? MUST BE DUE TO YOUR IGNORANCE AND LACK OF ANY EDUCATION.
Still too afraid to tell the Class where (if anywhere) you went to college?
Don't be ashamed. Many males attend beauty colleges.

Terri Tanna wrote:

<quoted text>
Tell the Class why that was not codified.
Without that Mason's "opinion" carries no more force and effect in Law than does grandiose "birther"-loser's view of FRCP.

2nd Amendment.

You're dismissed!

Learn to Read wrote:

<quoted text>
And another pathetic Birfoon proves that they can't read ... what part of "PRETENDING to be objective" did you find most confusing? I pre-acknowledge your ignorant rant in response ...

You really are illiterate.

MediaMatters doesn't pretend to be objective at all, as I proved.

FOX News does, as I also proved.

I accept your apology, and I'm glad to hear that you will seek professional mental help right after you complete your remedial reading classes.

Thought Police wrote:

<quoted text>
Yep, one by one the trolls pop out from under their rocks just as soon as they heard that Dr. Taitz had filed an appeal. Whaz da matta boy, you worried?

About Oily? hahahahaha

Oily is ALWAYS filling appeals ... and ALWAYS losing them. Another appeal, another Birfoon loss, another opportunity to laugh at your sorry ass, BOY