Jeff M wrote:
<quoted text>
I agree with what you say about knowingly distorting facts to promote your own political agenda. People shouldn't do that. But I am questioning what seems like your tendency to be the "grand judge" of what is considered fact and what is not. It seems that only ideas/facts that support your perspective are "valid." For instance, I do not know where you are getting these "FACTS" (in the following quote)but they are not the same "FACTS" that I have heard and read about numerous times. I think you've got it flip-flopped (The republicans are disupting the 85% of the bill). And it is not a "FACT" that republicans are challenging the content of the bill just to be difficult, but rather because it goes against their sense of fiscal responsibility. Check your own quote:
<quoted text>
Still waiting.

fuckingpartisan hack