Card Company, DeGeneres Make Deal

"Riiight, Califruity has so many "Conservative" Judges.. Get a clue, the state is loaded with liberal weeners, and the Judges are elected by the same liberal tree-hugging weeners"

RESPONSE:

I just love when the ignorant think THEY are the ones with a clue.

Educate yourself.

"I believe in people paying their own way."

RESPONSE:

Well, I believe that since my tax dollars, in part, pay for the education of heterosexual married peoples' children, I, too, should have the civil right to marry the person of my choice.

Cheers, thanks a lot.

"Or one of your pets too"

RESPONSE:

Ah, and yet again, the argument of fools. How original.

Pudbert_Savannah GA wrote:

<quoted text>
The voters will change things when they vote this one down in the Fall.

After George Takei and Ellen get married I expect a deluge of "closeted" gays to come out to get married. Once the anti-gay crowd realizes they have relatives that are gay public opinions should change. I think the referendum will fail this time around.

PS: There are more than two parties to vote for. Democrats and Republicans are often two sides of the same coin.

Pudbert_Savannah GA wrote:

<quoted text>
I fully understand why you're an atheist. It's an easier fit to your delusions.

You will find people will take you more seriously if you formulate an argument and lay off the ad hominems.

....in the end times wrong will be right and right will be wrong....

Lula wrote:

Below is a sampling of the idiotic, self-satisfied mindset of those simpletons who find some kind of superficial ego boost in taking an opportunity to feel superior to others, based solely on their heterosexuality.
In reality, they're all a bunch of idiots.
Constantly, people on "their side" are arguing that they represent the majority and that "the majority rules."
Well, the SJC of California has reminded us why the majority does NOT rule, and today, this website reminds us as well...
Here they are, folks:
"Portia Di Rossi is uber HAWT!! I'd do her and let Ellen watch."
"will they make an Ellen D scratch and sniff card??
yummy..."
"I think Ellen and Rosie would have made a better couple.But the only problem would have been who whould be the man of the house."
"You deserve em, r u a muncher too"
"gross- gross-gross-gross-gross-gross- gross-gross-GROSS"
"Hallmark Degenerate card:(Valentines day)
Dear Confused and vulnerable man hating friend
Lezzbe Friends ...I know you need me now
Ellen
Ps. Please pick up some vegetables before you come over"

Thank you...thank you......thank you very much.......I hereby "accept" this years Idiot award. I want to thank my fellow Idiots, my Idiot manager and publicist....My idiot editor and most of all my idiot readers who make it all possible. I love you all and thank you so idiotically.

Chester DeGrasse wrote:

I really hope a major earthquake strikes California and wipes it off the face of the earth.

Unfortunately for you, Floriduh will be underwater long before that.

The CA vote was a vote for what is normal so the idea
of marriage won't be pevert.

Who really cares about Ellen Degeneres..What we wanna know..is how's the munchin and snackin with Portia..SHOTGUN!

Just like all celebrates, she thinks her $money & her fame can buy her anything.
Even her own personal wants in this world.
Grow up Ellen.

If you go past where you need to be, you have to go backwards to get there

I don't understand how black people could all this way and then vote for discrimination. Of all groups of people, to do this to other people is just horrifying. I don't understand how one person's marriage affects ANYONE else's marriage. How? What difference does it make? I don't care what you do - go marry your sister for all I care. This is nuts and mean.

Just as "the people have spoken" on the presidency, the people have spoken on this ammendment. Shut up and accept it!

I think she's sad (or is it dissapointed?) because deep inside she now sees that this issue is not a "democrat - progressive - more illuminated" issue as Gays usually think. If this were the case it would've pass overwhelmingly. This election, not to take anything from Obama, was more a Bush referendum than anything else....

What scares us is the fact that your different but want to be looked upon as equal under a definition of marriage.

That's mental illness

Orlando_Atheist wrote:

<quoted text>
There's a problem when people start obsessing about other people's sex lives. I think it shows how scared they are of people who are different than them. You won't find them making these idiotic comments in person though.

And when are you planning to have children???

You have the civil right to be in a union with the person of your choice.

But Marriage...come on wake the f**K up

[QUOTE who="Lula
Well, I believe that since my tax dollars, in part, pay for the education of heterosexual married peoples' children, I, too, should have the civil right to marry the person of my choice.
Cheers, thanks a lot.[/QUOTE]

How did you get here fool?, where you pulled out of someone's Asse

I would say its one of many freaking prerequiste needed to call it marriage.(check your history)

Marriage was not created for same sex individuals - this is where the line is drawn and will remain.

Orlando_Atheist wrote:

<quoted text>
Are you saying a functioning male and female genitalia are the only prerequisite for marriage?
In that case we should inspect everyone's privates before marriage.
Actually I don't obsess about anyone else's sex lives. If that is something you are suffering I advise you to seek counselling. What goes on behind private doors by two consenting adults is no one else's business.

I am not against homosexuals having equal benefits as married couples, but I think the underlying reason most people don't support gay marriage is because it has no underlying basis attached to it.

Logical Argument- It doesn't produce anything for society. What does gay marriage due to improve the society we live in? Homosexuals can't reproduce unless they adopt. Studies have shown that children who are raised in homosexual households may become sexually confused and\or have behaviorial difficulties later in adult life. Many homosexual advocates feel that if divorce rates are so high this shouldn't be a factor, but this is an argument on the failure of marriage. Not the purpose or existence of marriage.

Religious - All religions frown upon homosexuality. Homosexual marriage would basically be celebrating it in the face of all religions. Even if you are athiest or agnostic, many religions still have an enormous impact in American society. The religious argument can be dismissed by many homosexuals, but it can't be discounted. As long as religion exists, there will be opposition to gay marriage. This is a fact whether you agree or disagree with relgious believers.

Scientific - Homosexuality is often defined as a behavioral anomaly inside the brain. Scientists don't know what causes it nor can they confirm if people are born with it or acquire it through childhood. But statistical instances of homosexuality is miniscule in comparison to the world's overall heterosexual population. Therefore, as a small percentage it will always be treated as such and not have the same clout or respect as traditional marriages between a man and a woman.

I think what bothers most heterosexuals about gay marriage is that if a person decides to make a lifestyle choice they then demand that society conform to their definition of existing norms. This comes across as arrogant and also overbearing. I think gays would have a better chance at equality if they defined gay marriage as something else. This would afford them the same benefits as married couples which is what they ultimately want. To change definition of marriage that is thousands of years old to accomodate one small fraction of society opens up a plethora of new problems when ever special interest group wants to redefine things we have taken for granted all along. Some change is good, but you have to ask yourself what advantages that change will bring and how does it benefit society as a whole.