Your town. Your news. Your take.

Local News: Los Angeles, CA 

 | 

Sign Up

 | 

Sign In

 
Advertisment

Rush Limbaugh to get $38M a year for next 8 years

Comments (Page 24)

Showing posts 461 - 469 of 469
« prev | next »
Go to last post | Jump to page:
Carroll

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#537
Aug 1, 2008
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Get that rat.
Swamp Rat

Baltimore, MD

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#538
Aug 1, 2008
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Sweet-e-Pie wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey Rodent,
The Liberals are going to take away your Kool-Aid card if you keep listening to Fox News and Rush. A Liberal Rodent like you should not be listening to the real truth it may sink in to that pea sized brain of yours. God forbid that someone like you understands anything but your Liberal Talking Points even though they are mostly B.S.
Unlike you, Retard-e-Pie, I am not a fan of anyone's talking points. That's why, unlike you, no one will see me cutting and pasting fake quotes from random websites that you found during your lunch break from your job at Big Lots. I mostly choose to pick on you because you are completely retarded, not because of your political affiliations (I know that's a big word for you). There are many people who I respect for their well-thought-out support of McCain....and Obama...the two are not so different. I don't care who votes for who. I support ACTUAL INTELLIGENCE. Not your usual 2nd grade drivel.

Since you brought up "truth" (by the way, please explain the difference between truth and "real truth" that you mentioned), Fox won a lawsuit against a teacher last year (in US District Court) based upon the legal argument that, "Fox News is not a government agency, and therefore, is not legally bound to report what a reasonable citizen would consider to be "truth.""

You can't have it both ways. You can say that Fox News is less false than CNN....you won't hurt my feelings. My saying that Fox, Rush, or any of their liberal counterparts speak the truth (or in your third grade terminology, "the real truth"), is obvious evidence of your 9th grade education.

Goodbye!(or in your usual spelling....good By."

Please let me know if any of the words in my response were too complicated for you to understand.
wtf

Miami, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#540
Aug 1, 2008
 
Gary wrote:
<quoted text>I thought his post was clear, concise and to the point. Unlike yours.
Sorry to confuse you sir, next time I'll use smaller words or type slower if you wish.
Gary

Schnecksville, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#541
Aug 3, 2008
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Swamp Rat wrote:
<quoted text>
Unlike you, Retard-e-Pie, I am not a fan of anyone's talking points. That's why, unlike you, no one will see me cutting and pasting fake quotes from random websites that you found during your lunch break from your job at Big Lots. I mostly choose to pick on you because you are completely retarded, not because of your political affiliations (I know that's a big word for you). There are many people who I respect for their well-thought-out support of McCain....and Obama...the two are not so different. I don't care who votes for who. I support ACTUAL INTELLIGENCE. Not your usual 2nd grade drivel.
Since you brought up "truth" (by the way, please explain the difference between truth and "real truth" that you mentioned), Fox won a lawsuit against a teacher last year (in US District Court) based upon the legal argument that, "Fox News is not a government agency, and therefore, is not legally bound to report what a reasonable citizen would consider to be "truth.""
You can't have it both ways. You can say that Fox News is less false than CNN....you won't hurt my feelings. My saying that Fox, Rush, or any of their liberal counterparts speak the truth (or in your third grade terminology, "the real truth"), is obvious evidence of your 9th grade education.
Goodbye!(or in your usual spelling....good By."
Please let me know if any of the words in my response were too complicated for you to understand.
Please don't rationalize anything by what is said in the courts. Finding truth in a courtroom is a rare thing.
Gary

Schnecksville, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#542
Aug 3, 2008
 
wtf wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry to confuse you sir, next time I'll use smaller words or type slower if you wish.
O.K. but it would be better to make clear, concise points instead of disjointed ramblings.
arkeyo

Naperville, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#543
Aug 3, 2008
 
lynn wrote:
I wish he would choke on his oxyicontin, big mouth baffoon. the Radio station has a screw loose to pay this **** so much, but oh well,**** listen to his garbage.
The fact that he evokes this kind of reaction from liberal meat sticks such as you tells me that he must be doing something right.Remember my dimwitted friend......hate is not a family value.
mighty white

Newport News, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#544
Aug 3, 2008
 
Aint that America
DHM

“Gotta Love Dave....”

Joined: Jan 8, 2008

Comments: 2175

Hampton

ISP: Portsmouth, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#545
Aug 3, 2008
 
arkeyo wrote:
<quoted text>The fact that he evokes this kind of reaction from liberal meat sticks such as you tells me that he must be doing something right.Remember my dimwitted friend......hate is not a family value.
That's what I don't get. Why the fuss? So what if he makes loads of money speaking on controversial matters on radio? He certainly isn't the only one - look at Howard Stern. TURN THE CHANNEL IF YOU DON'T LIKE IT.
Swamp Rat

Baltimore, MD

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#547
Aug 3, 2008
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Gary wrote:
<quoted text>Please don't rationalize anything by what is said in the courts. Finding truth in a courtroom is a rare thing.
Well damn, that is a pretty good point. My only response could be, if we cannot seek truth in the courts, where can we ever hope to find it? But you raise a great point. Introducing lawyers never brings "the truth" any more to light.

Sweet-e-Pie, please take note of this. I just got "served" by Gary. He made a quick, intelligent, dare I say salient point, that TOTALLY (in his mind) disagreed with mine, and TOTALLY erased my entire argument in one swipe. Anything I respond to beyond this point would be considered "semantics" and a waste of Gary's time, and my time.

Notice that Gary did not make spelling or grammatical errors like you, or tell me to "Go LiK UR BUttt Libberel." Which is your typical way of responding to anything that is not pro-Lush Limbaugh.

If you want to erode support for Liberals, Democrats, Obama, etc....this is how you do it. With intelligent retorts, quips, and perhaps even facts. Not constant stupidity, ignorance, and unfounded anger at the unknown.
Showing posts 461 - 469 of 469
« prev | next »
Go to last post | Jump to page:
Type in your comments to post to the forum
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent Publishing Discussions
Topic Updated Last By Comments
Obama Filling His Cabinet With Experienced Friends 3 hr middleclass 1101
Newspapers Call on Rangel to Resign from Ways &... 3 hr Just An Obse... 6
John Yemma named Monitor editor 4 hr doG 3
Smaller Pakistan in redrawn South Asia map sp... 4 hr Pindi Muzaff... 113
Imagining, Assessing A Newspaper's Demise 6 hr Robert 17
State Legislators Trying To Save Newspapers In ... 12 hr Fed Up 19
Secret Order Lets U.S. Raid Al Qaeda in Many Co... 12 hr Mad Dog USN 52
Related Topix Forums: US News, US Politics, Entertainment, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, New York, New York Times