Looking for agent to assist my client

Posted in the Banking Forum

Comments (Page 7)

Showing posts 121 - 140 of234
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
A Justday

Hamburg, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#146
Jul 18, 2012
 

Judged:

5

5

4

I was taught by my dad almost a half a century ago in Taiwan to aim high when I left for America as a young man ,,I never forgot his words of wisdom and advice..

Looking back, I appreciate United States Federal Court, the Western New York District in Buffalo, NY to begin the legal precedence offering the Pro Se Litigant a chance to question Defendants' attorneys on Merit of A Civil Action (Case) in relation to the Bank Fraud and Employees' Misconduct.. Further more, the employment of ADR Plan (Alternative Dispute Resolution Plan of June 24, 2011) in a court directed Mediation and Intervention can be trusted as a just and fair legal tool for settling disputes in many a civil complaints!

I only wish that "Perjury" can be added as a Civil Offense w/ Punitive Damages to ward off the Attorneys w/ less than honest undertakings!!
A Justday

Hamburg, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#147
Jul 29, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

This will be the update of my Civil Case against Citibank for Bank Fraud and three Employees for Foreclosing my Bank Checking Account, an Unlawful Misconduct...In the world of Legal Proceedings, no one even the defendants' Attorneys can afford/ have loose tongues and drum up/ make false charges: For the unsubstantiated accusations will SINK Ship as the old slang goes!

I am a man of Wisdom and Knowledge: I often appreciate the world that offered and guided (Pointed out) the way when I aim high...It does not mean personal favors from any body and it definitely involves no one from the Clerk Office of the United States District Court, Western New York district
in Buffalo, NY...If I sense something that defies logics and legality, I walk away from IT...It is ME!!!

AIM High and learn a thing or two from me!!!



A Justday

Hamburg, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#149
Jul 30, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

To expand the coverage of A Civil Case against Citibank and Employees and To dispute all suspicious characters from on line attacks (Yahoo Message Board to other Media Source) to Defame, I demand Barry J. Glickman, the attorney who signed the July 25, 2012 Reply Memorandum on behalf of Citibank and Employees in the United States District Court, Western New York District in Buffalo, NY to produce proofs SOON in order to substantiate all the false and inflammatory statements he made in legal depositions, Or, he and his Law partners will be sued for Perjury and Libel - It is no laughing matter!!!
A Justday

Hamburg, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#151
Jul 30, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Now, my July 30, 2012 Reply Memorandum is filed at Federal District Court, Western New York District in Buffalo, NY, let us all wait for a timely reply from Barry J. Glickman who signed the Defendants' Reply Motion of July 25, 2012..
His defamatory statements have been edited and cautioned in the Exhibit of my July 30, 2012 Reply Memorandum..I, The Plaintiff filed the Civil Case No. 12-CV-0566 (RJA) against Citibank for Bank Fraud and Employees for Foreclosure of my Checking Account will file a Second Motion w/ heavy Punitive Damages against Barry J. Glickman and Law Partners for Libel and Perjury as soon as their reply is received - It is A
Promise!
A Justday

Hamburg, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#153
Jul 30, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Let me release a part of my July 30, 2012 Letter to Clerk of Courts, United States District Court, Western New York District in buffalo, NY detailing the defamatory statements made by Barry J. Glickman who signed the July 15, 2012 Reply Motion on behalf of Citibank and Employees. The purpose is to have the World bear witness to this important Civil proceedings taken up by a Pro Se litigant:

An excerpt:

....Regardless of when this “Reply” was received, the One-and-Half paged Reply Motion is deemed totally without Merits to be illustrated below:

First and Foremost - The Defendants' Reply of July 25, 2012 showed proof of a deliberate attempt to negate the ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution) Plan of June 24, 2011 issued by Federal District Court, Western New York District in Buffalo, NY by faulting the Clerk Office instructions: Pursuant to the ADR Plan in a Court directed Mediation and Intervention process, it is considered legal and proper for Summons to be served in the way executed presently!

As to the Statements: On Page 1,“...Plaintiff intimates that he conferred with the Clerk of this Court about his decision to simply mail the summons and complaints to defendants ...” Again on Page 1,“....Worse yet, he seems to shift the burden of proper service of the summons and complaint to the Clerk of the Court...”, All It PROVES is that Defendants' Attorney who signed the July 25, 2012 Reply, Barry A. Glickman can not be trusted for presenting any FACTS*..

*The Defendants' Attorneys including Barry A. Gilckman will have to produce proof(s) immediately to substantiate the above highly inflammatory if not derogatory remarks that I, Plaintiff conferred with Michael J. Roemer, Clerk of the Court about my decision to simply mail the summons and complaints to the defendants in Civil Case No. 12-CV-0566A. Furthermore, I intend to shift the burden of proper service of the summons and complaint to Michael J. Roemer, Clerk of the Court

A SECOND NOTICE OF MOTION WILL BE FILED awaiting Defendants' Attorneys' response to this alleged charge as evidenced in this July 30, 2012 Letter to Clerk of the Courts: For Barry J. Glickman's Statements carried the implicit charge w/ intent to damage and defame the integrity of American Judiciary System – An issue that needs to be addressed and or resolved because there is no room for contemptible depositions in the United States District Court.. I will demand heavy Punitive Damages in that to be used for a Legal Fund in the future by filing A MEMORADUM IN SUPPORT OF LAW FOR AN ORDER TO ERADICATE PURJURY AND LIBEL IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS.

End of the Excerpt....

In time, I will release more of the Exhibit relating to this Civil Case NO: 12-CV-0566 (RJA)/ Reply Memorandum of July 30, 2012 - The goal is to stimulate all readers to file Pro Se Litigations w/o fear for those high power Attorneys who often work for Money and hired by outfits like Citibank! God Bless.
A Justday

Hamburg, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#154
Jul 31, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Instead of going on with more of the civil proceedings of a case that obviously demonstrates the need to protect not just my family interest being shackled and cheated by Citibank & Employees, let me also point out Who Pro Se Litigants are: Any one in America who is victimized by the banking system employing High Power Attorneys to use loopholes and other less than honest tricks to defeat the decent folks; Any one who can read and write w/ Sense and Courage plus Belief of American Justice to Right the Wrongs; and Any one who rather see the resolution of an Injustice rectified w/o having to spend a fortune in Court!!!

For Pro Se Litigation means that all you need is to file the Complaint in the District Court of your State at a very affordable rate (about $ 300 at the Western New York District Court in Buffalo, NY for instance)..and my experience told me: Be patient and Be prudent to tell your story to the Court and convince the Judge the Merits of your complaint..Along the way, if by technicalities (one of the tricks commonly used by High Power Attorneys being hired by outfits like Citibank), your case got thrown out, you can always file Appeals and also begin filing a New Case...Again, learn your lessons well and don't just walk away from it..It is called: AIM High that was the Words of Wisdom and Advice my dad taught me almost a half century ago in Taiwan when I left for America as a young man..Now, I pass on to you in his honor! God Bless!
A Justday

Hamburg, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#155
Aug 1, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

This message appeared on Yahoo Message Board: Elementary My dear Watson - If Sherlock Holm never said that before, I bet you Sherlock would make an undeniable remark NOW: In A Civil Case against Citibank for Bank Fraud; and Employees for Unlawful Foreclosure of my Checking Account in April of 2011, the Law Attorneys refused to discern two entirely separate accounts of serious charges and purposely blend them into one Entity... My question: Who said the three employees of Citibank named in the Civil Case No. 12-CV-0566 (RJA) can assume the whole identity of A Bank that is purported to be the third largest in America?? Also, who will pay their huge punitive damages??? Don't play dumb w/ intent to confuse the Defendants - Elementary, My dear Watson!!! At end if Citibank is paying their punitive damages, I will file suit on behalf of Citibank for I am also a bank share holder!!! The law is specific and precise!!!
A Justday

Hamburg, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#156
Aug 1, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

It is highly irregular and probably illegal for Citibank to pay for three employees' legal fee to defend their personal misconducts and unlawful behavior in the April 2011 foreclosure of my Checking Account - It has been worded in the Exhibit of my July 30, 2012 Reply Memorandum in support of Law for An Order to dismiss (and vacate) the Defendants' July 25, 2012 Reply Motion...It appears that Citibank and Employees have committed more Civil Offense(s) that they realize! It is about time for them to learn...Believe it or NOT that one of the Employees is the Chief Counsel to Citibank!!
A Justday

Hamburg, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#157
Aug 1, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

2

As a shareholder of Citibank and the Plaintiff filing suit against Citibank for Bank Fraud A) and its Employees for unlawful foreclosure of my Checking Account in April 2011 B), let me also define Embezzlement for the Defendants (Vikram S. Pandit, Benjamin D. Velella and Anthony Correnti)- To permit their Attorneys to use Bank funds to defend their personal offense in A Civil Case No. 12-CV-0566 (RJA) and in the future when they permit Bank Funds to be used for their Attorneys including Barry J. Glickman to defend and send A reply to the alleged charge of Perjury + Libel...Since the latter incident is evolving as we speak, let it be a Warning!
In the future again, if the Defendants chose to use Bank Funds to cover their personal obligations such as Punitive Damages, then A Criminal Offense of Embezzlement will be filed!
A Justday

Hamburg, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#159
Aug 6, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

There is also a Second filing on August 6, 2012 against Barry J. Glickman/ Zeichner Ellman & Kruse, LLP for being a Co-conspirator of A Scheme to use Citibank Bank funds to defend Bank Employees for personal Mis-conducts...Again, it is an alleged charge that Barry J. Zeichner Ellman & Kruse, LLP has 21 days to respond and provide proofs to Court...A Punitive Damages is also attached to this Memorandum of August 6, 2012 filed at the Federal District Court, Western New York district in Buffalo, NY...There is also the issue of Fiduciary Duty to be argued and resolved in Court!!! Stay tuned!!!
A Justday

Hamburg, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#162
Aug 12, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Being an highly educated and learned man at 70; Being the Trustee of Lee Family Wealth Trust (LFW Trust) with enormous responsibility; and Being the elder of Lee Family directly descended from the Ming Dynasty Emperor Jung-Le in 1640s of China, I will not act foolishly to make many trips to the Federal District Court, Western New York District in Buffalo, NY to file Motions against Citibank for Bank Frauds; to file Motions against Bank Employees (Vikram S. Pandit; Benjamin D. Velella and Anthony Correnti) for unlawful foreclosure of my Checking Account w/o cause and for the Scheme to use Bank Funds for their own legal defense; and lately, to file Motions against Barry J. Glickman/ Z in Perjury + Libel and Conspiracy for being a Co-Conspirator using Citibank Bank Funds to defend Bank Employees for personal offenses (Lack of Fiduciary Integrity): For those filings are The Memorandums of LAW!!!

When Barry J. Glickman/ Z claimed and suggested to the Court and the presiding judge (RJA) in the Civil Case No. 12-CV-0566 that those Memorandums of Law filed since June 18, 2012 including the Two Filings on August 6, 2012 on Perjury + Libel and Conspiracy do not seem to have any bearings and or need not be considered, in their Letter of Reply on August 9, 2012, Barry J. Glickman/ Z are playing fire and showed contempt to the American Judiciary System...This point will be clearly and amply focused in my final Letter of Reply!

It is intended to be part of the Record for the ongoing Legal Proceedings of Civil Case NO. 12-CV-0566 (RJA).
A Justday

Hamburg, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#163
Aug 13, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

When I received a e-mail from the publishers the other day, it gave me the idea: To publish the Book entitled: The Memorandum of Law - A Civil Case No. 12-CV-0566 (RJA)...It will be based entirely on all the comments (not just mine) w/o any changes and editing posted on the Banking Forum...For obvious reasons - A greater publicity toward decent Americans who could not otherwise find the legal avenues to right the wrongs.. Pro Se Litigation is the WAY!!!
A Justday

Hamburg, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#164
Aug 14, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

The following is for Citibank (Bank Fraud), Bank Employees (Vikram S. Pandit, Benjamin D. Velella & Anthony Correnti for unlawful Foreclosure of A Checking Account) and Barry J. Glickman/ Z (for Perjury + Lib el and Conspiracy) to avoid in any future Letter of Reply:

Firstly, Being Fatally Flawed: In three separate occasions, Barry J. Glickman/ Z dwelt on the way A Summon was served (The Defendants' Reply Motion For An Order on July 25, 2012; His Letters of Reply of August 9, 2012 and August …, 2012); refused to respond to Two Filings on August 6, 2012 of Memorandums of Law For An Order to Void Perjury + Libel in Civil Proceedings in the Civil Case No. 12-CV-0566 (RJA)– First Filing and For An Order to Void Conspiracy in Civil Proceedings in the Civil Case No. 12-CV-0566 (RJA)– The Second Filing; and Most Conspicuously, he then ignored the evidence + proofs provided in Plaintiff's Reply Memorandum of Law of July 30, 2012 as shown below plus Letter of Reply dated August 1, 2012:

*****
Secondly, Being Aberrational: In the Defendants' Reply Motion of July 25, 2012, Barry J. Glickman/ Z showed intent to Negate the District Court Clerk Office Instructions of A Federal District Court Issued ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution) Plan of June 24, 2011 in a Court Ordered Mediation/ Intervention w/ libelous statements and slandering remarks that have damaged the good name of Plaintiff...For that, the First Filing on AUGUST 6, 2012 of A Memorandum of Law For An Order to Void Perjury + Libel is based upon w/ demand of Punitive Damages ($ 50 m)..
Furthermore, Barry J. Glickman/ Z never accomplished the deed to identify its roles in any of the three replies (The Defendants' Reply Motion For An Order on July 25, 2012; His Letters of Reply of August 9, 2012 and August …, 2012) as outlined below:
Role One – Defendant
1) Defendant in the First Filing of August 6, 2012 on Perjury + Libel;
2) Defendant in the Second Filing of August 6, 2012 on Conspiracy
Role Two – Attorney(s)
3) Attorney(s) to Represent Citibank for Bank Fraud;
4) Attorney(s) to Represent Citibank Employees for Foreclosure of A Checking Account

His failure/ intentional neglect shall be grounds for the Court to enter Default Judgment(s) on Punitive Damages in Two Separate Filings on August 6, 2012 of Memorandums of Law as stated before!
When other Defendants (Citibank for Bank Fraud; Bank Employees: Vikram S. Pandit – Defendant 2; Benjamin D. Velella – Defendant 3 and Anthony Correnti – Defendant 4) ignored their obligations to respond to the alleged charges in past Memorandums of Law filed since June 18, 2012 and to the August 6, 2012 Second Filing of A Memorandum of Law to Void Conspiracy in Civil Proceedings in A Civil Case No. 12-CV-0566 (RJA) as shown below, I urge the Court(s) to enter Default Judgment: The charged Bank Fraud committed by Citibank & Unlawful Foreclosure of Checking Account by Bank Employees listed in A Civil Case No. 12-CV-0566 (RJA) plus the Punitive Damages:

Barry J. Glcikman/ Zeichner Ellman & Krause, LLP having filed Defendants' Reply Motion for An Order on July 25, 2012 Dismissing the Complaint in a Civil Case (12-CV-0566 RJA) in response to the June 20, 2012 Summons issued by Clerk Office of the District Court is found allegedly guilty of accepting Bank Funds to Defend Bank Employees' Misconduct - A Scheme w/
Bank Employees to act as the Co-Conspirator: Collectively, they are cited as the Defendants in this Second Filing on August 6, 2012 of A Memorandum For An Order to Void Conspiracy In A Civil Case No. 12-CV-0566 (RJA)..

*****
and Finally, No Nameless Group of Defendants: My past filings in Courts since June 18, 2012 are Memorandums of Law – No one including Barry J. Glickman/ Z can deliberately and willfully ignore and dismiss them as if they do not exist..All Defendants ought to choose their own action separately & responsibly: For Lack of Action will invite undeniable Legal Consequences!
A Justday

Hamburg, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#165
Aug 14, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

I found weirdos around to make ridiculous judged opinions of their twisted minds w/o qualification and knowledge of LAW! If they have guts, show their faces and identities so I could file suits against any and all of them: Don't be Cowards hiding behind and remaining Nameless!!!

It was the warning to all Defendants in my earlier comment and it shall serve those Cowards as well!!!
A Justday

Hamburg, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#166
Aug 14, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

It was too kind for me to label Barry J. Glickman/ Z's August 9, 2012 Letter of Reply as Two paged rendering: In fact, by typing double or triple space, it was a less than one page of Rambling and Babbling w/ nothing but NONSENSE! Let us hope that in the last if there is one Letter of Reply from now to August 27, 2012, all Defendants (Citibank for Bank Fraud, Vikram S. Pandit, Benjamin D. Velella and Anthony Correnti - The Bank Employees for Unlawful Foreclosure of A Checking Account and the Two accounts committed by Barry J. Glickman/ Z for Perjury + Lible and Conspiracy to scheme up the use of Bank Funds to defend Bank Employees' personal offense) will deliver a written Response to the Court for the final Judgment... Otherwise, each and every Defendant shall be found Guilty for not Responding - A Default Judgment will be entered as I urged Court to proceed in accordance with the LAW!!
A Justday

Hamburg, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#167
Aug 14, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

It was too kind for me to label Barry J. Glickman/ Z's August 9, 2012 Letter of Reply as Two paged rendering: In fact, by typing double or triple space, it was a less than one page of Rambling and Babbling w/ nothing but NONSENSE! Let us hope that in the last if there is one Letter of Reply from now to August 27, 2012, all Defendants (Citibank for Bank Fraud, Vikram S. Pandit, Benjamin D. Velella and Anthony Correnti - The Bank Employees for Unlawful Foreclosure of A Checking Account and the Two accounts committed by Barry J. Glickman/ Z for Perjury + Libel and Conspiracy to scheme up the use of Bank Funds to defend Bank Employees' personal offense) will deliver a written Response to the Court for the final Judgment... Otherwise, each and every Defendant shall be found Guilty for not Responding - A Default Judgment will be entered as I urged the Court to proceed in accordance with LAW!!
A Justday

Hamburg, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#168
Aug 14, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Let me foretell the likely tactics to be employed by Barry J. Glickman/ Z in their Letter of Reply that may come any day now or at the end of A Deadline on August 27, 2012 w/ intent/ hope to delay their unfortunate outcome: Default by judgment for Repeating the same argument of No Merits that has been discussed and dealt with in more than half a dozen Letters of Reply plus three Filings of Memorandums of Law since July 25, 2012...One needs to ask WHY?

An Excerpt from my August 1, 2012 Letter of Reply is shown below as Evidence and Proof:

First and Foremost - The Defendants' Reply of July 25, 2012 showed proof of a deliberate attempt to negate the ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution) Plan of June 24, 2011 issued by Federal District Court, Western New York District in Buffalo, NY by faulting the Clerk Office instructions: Pursuant to the ADR Plan in a Court directed Mediation and Intervention process, it is considered legal and proper for Summons to be served in the way executed presently!


As to the Statements (of July 25, 2012): On Page 1,“...Plaintiff intimates that he conferred with the Clerk of this Court about his decision to simply mail the summons and complaints to defendants ...” Again on Page 1,“....Worse yet, he seems to shift the burden of proper service of the summons and complaint to the Clerk of the Court...”, All It PROVES is that Defendants' Attorney who signed the July 25, 2012 Reply, Barry A. Glickman can not be trusted for presenting any FACTS*..

*The Defendants' Attorneys including Barry A. Gilckman will have to produce proof(s) immediately to substantiate the above highly inflammatory if not derogatory remarks that I, Plaintiff conferred with Michael J. Roemer, Clerk of the Court about my decision to simply mail the summons and complaints to the defendants in Civil Case No. 12-CV-0566A. Furthermore, I intend to shift the burden of proper service of the summons and complaint to Michael J. Roemer, Clerk of the Court

****

In conclusion: No one shall be confused by this tactics and the least of all is the Court(s)...I trust: Barry J. Glickman/ Z and the Defendants (Citibank for committing Bank Fraud; Vikram S. Pandit, Benjamin D. Velella & Anthony Correnti - The Bank Employees who foreclosed my Checking Account unlawfully and also retained Barry J. Glickman/ Z as their Attorneys) will be greatly disappointed at end!!
A Justday

Hamburg, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#169
Aug 15, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

This is a serious and solemn message intended for Citibank in the Civil Case No. 12-CV-0566 (RJA) to consider before the final resolution in and around August 27, 2012: Citibank could make a plea to reduce the obligated payments by billions of dollars from IRS...However, I could not offer any advice on the reduction of Punitive Damages for other Defendants including Barry J. Glickman/ Z and Bank Employees due to their insistence and precariousness in pursuing a Civil Offense(s) few in America dare to proceed!
On other hand, if they have not forgotten the ADR Plan in A Court-directed Mediation and Intervention, certain consideration could be worked out! But, it is not for me to SAY!!!
A Justday

Hamburg, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170
Aug 15, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

As said, all my comments are intended for the Defendants in A Civil Case No. 12-CV-0566 (RJA) and they will be published in A Book entitled "The Memorandum of Law - A Civil Case 12-CV-0566 (RJA)". No need for any low-life and bad seed to send a judged opinion(s)...Their twisted minds simply hurt other readers at present time...Besides, the Courts will soon issue the final resolution/ Verdict on the Bank Fraud, Unlawful Foreclosure of A Checking Account, the Perjury + Libel and Conspiracy filings...A Pro Se Litigation is the WAY to go for America!!!
A Justday

Hamburg, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#171
Aug 16, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

I traveled with high moral standards and only take the High Road when I made comments on Barry J.Glickman/ Z's August 9, 2012 Letter of Reply...Let me be a bit more conclusive in having the exact words of that Reply:

The excerpt of Barry J. Glickman/ Z' August 9, 2012 Reply -

"Based on our (their) review of this Court's docket we (they) understand that the only motion that is presently pending is Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Complaint filed on July 25, 2012 (D.J.8).."

Never in two hundred plus years of American history have I discovered a Letter of Reply from the Attorney(s) who also happened to become the "Defendant" in the Civil Case No. 12-CV-0566 (RJA) after the June 18, 2012 filing followed by the Three Memorandums of Law filed in between July 25, 2012 to the present To make a legal Deposition to the Court(s) asking for the Presiding Judge (RJA) to consider a passage (writing) of Total Lack of Integrity!!!

For it shows nothing but NONSENSE plus Lack of Merits! If necessary, the judge could have ruled Contempt of the Court(s) w/ all the Punitive Damages!

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 121 - 140 of234
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

17 Users are viewing the Banking Forum right now

Search the Banking Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
we provide swift mt103 two way-HSBC and MT799 b... (Apr '13) 37 min JEFF LIU 25
The Fraudulent Photo of David Cheever is now pu... 2 hr A Legal Expert 2
Citigroup Anti-Money-Laundering Chief Mufti to ... 2 hr A Legal Expert 5
Why would David Cheever need a Bonus and from W... (Oct '12) 3 hr A Legal Expert 6
The Fraud on the Courts may prove to be the Wat... (Jun '13) 4 hr A Legal Expert 7
David Cheever does not need all the feeble defe... 4 hr A Legal Expert 2
There is a more important question for David Ch... 5 hr A Legal Expert 10
•••
•••
•••
•••