A VETERANS CLAIM BACKLOG?
These U.S. Senate "designed to harm" experiments are now, and have been, conducted on their stated "HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS" of DOD "GUINEA PIGS".[9] In 2008 still ignored is the U.S. Senate's, "The Feres Doctrine should not be applied for military personnel who are harmed by inappropriate human experimentation when informed consent has not been given."[9] They are accomplished under the cover of our "national security missions".[13] For active duty military personnel and veterans it is an operant conditioned matter of trust, i.e., not questioned is "inappropriate human experimentation" behavior.
Still not given back are those rights that convicted rapists and murderers keep.[6] That they are ongoing on thousands more is proven by the latest 2008 U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO)[14], of their many 1993, 1994 & 1997 [5, 7 & 10] Reports, the ignored U.S. Senate 1994 experimentation Report [9] and the to-date negative response to the 1953 Department of Defense (DOD) Secretary’s NO experiments, without the subjects knowledge and consent [3]. Deliberately avoided are the treatment evidence and victim notification issues! In 2005 and 2006 Congress failed to pass the, "Veterans Right to Know Act"! Three (3) years before the 1953 order was the U.S. Supreme Court FERES the DOD "incident to service" DOCTRINE.[1] The U.S. Supreme Court 1987 STANLEY Case [4] functionally expanded the FERES coverage from the accidental "incident to service" to the deliberate, DOD can do no "designed to harm" wrong. In 2008 Congress still ignored is the U.S. Senate’s 1994 correcting, "The Feres Doctrine should not be applied...".[9]
Presented are the first two paragraphs of a 16 References document. The complete three pages are available on request.
Do you know the military indoctrination references, i.e., through operant conditioned behavior a victim never the wiser becomes? If so, they would be most appreciated. Thank you.
DHM
REFERENCES FOR THE 1ST. TWO PARAGRAPHS:
[1] U.S. Supreme Court, Feres v. United States, 340 U.S. 135, 146 (1950).
[3] DOD Secretary's 26 February 1953 NO non-consensual, human experiment’s Memo pages 343-345. George J. Annas and Michael A. Grodin, "The Nazi Doctors and the Nuremberg Code; Human Rights in Human Experimentation" (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992). In Reference [9] as NOTES 72, 168 & 169.
[4] U.S. Supreme Court, June 25, 1987, U.S. V. Stanley, 107 S. Ct. 3054 (Volume 483 U.S., Section 669, Pages 699 to 710). In Reference [9] Cited in Note 169.
[5] 1993 U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO) Report on Secret tests-http://archive.gao.gov/d 37t11/148642.pdf
[6] U.S. State Dept., "U.S. Report under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights July 1994, Art. 7".
[7] GAO Testimony Before the Legislation and National Security Subcommittee, Committee on Government Operations, House of Representatives. September 28, 1994 Human Experimentation. http://archive.gao.gov/t2pbat2/152601.pdf
[9] U.S. Senate December 8, 1994 REPORT 103-97 "Is Military Research Hazardous to Veterans' Health? Lessons Spanning Half a Century." Hearings Before the U.S. Senate Committee on Veterans' Affairs, 103rd Congress 2nd Session. With NOTES 1 to 170. Committee Print - S. Print. 103-97.
[10] GAO May 1997, DEFENSE HEALTH CARE, www.gao.gov/archive/1997/ns97136.pdf
[13] "Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA)" S-3678.
[14] The 2008 GAO Report On Chemical and Biological Tests conducted on American Veterans. http://www..gao.gov/new.items/ d08366.pdf