|
Ex PA Senator Frothy Lube
Philadelphia, PA
|
Dismayed wrote: <quoted text> Regardless of your interpretation, weather and climate are definitely interrelated...it's just a matter of time. "The difference between weather and climate is a measure of time. Weather is what conditions of the atmosphere are over a short period of time, and climate is how the atmosphere "behaves" over relatively long periods of time." And "relatively long periods of time" is subjective. Your comment about the temperature on a particular day, Super Bowl day, has nothing to do with climate change. Just as the blizzards in the Midwest do not. And weather is not really connected to climate. It's a blip. The other is a trend. As I suggested you're not really at all clear on the difference, because if you add "time" to "weather" you're no longer speaking of a "blip," you're then speaking of a "trend," i.e., not weather. I sure do hope I made it simple enough this time.
|
|
Ex PA Senator Frothy Lube
Philadelphia, PA
|
dragoon70056 wrote: <quoted text> It was the globull warming scientists and meteorologists that were saying that weather would be affected by globull warming, ala more hurricanes, AND more powerful hurricanes. That doesn't mean a single instance of temperature - or blizzard - sheds any light on climate change, you constapo cretin. But when you morons start to see a trend of more extreme weather despite your denial then we'll hear your alternate "explanations" about what could be causing the trend towards more extreme weather events. You know, sunspots, adultery, abortion, etc. The usual televangeologist sort of "religious" "science."
|
|
“It's a Brand New Day”
Since: Feb 06
New Rochelle
|
Please wait...
dragoon70056 wrote: <quoted text> It was the globull warming scientists and meteorologists that were saying that weather would be affected by globull warming, ala more hurricanes, AND more powerful hurricanes. Do you look outside? Yes., Yes it is happening.
|
|
“Liberalism is a Disease”
Since: Jul 09
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
Judged:
2
1
Ex PA Senator Frothy Lube wrote: <quoted text> But when you morons start to see a trend of more extreme weather Aren't you the moron that said that weather doesn't equate to climate change?
|
|
“Liberalism is a Disease”
Since: Jul 09
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
Mr_Bill wrote: <quoted text> Do you look outside? Yes., Yes it is happening. Looks about the same here as it did the same time last year.
|
|
Ex PA Senator Frothy Lube
Philadelphia, PA
|
dragoon70056 wrote: <quoted text> Aren't you the moron that said that weather doesn't equate to climate change? I just _knew_ I couldn't make it simple enough for you. Hey moron, why do you bother since you don't "believe in" climate change? Idiot, weather is two days or seven days. Climate is over time. The former has nothing to say about the latter except over time. Then it's not weather. Blip. Trend. Tea Bagger. Repeat.
|
|
Bob Burns
China
|
Pat Robertson s Fatwass wrote: <quoted text> Sure moron, it's the Marxist Communist pinkos at "Forbes." You cretin. OK Chicken Little, if you think the sky is falling, and giving money to governments will prop it up, go ahead give yours. "A fool and his money are soon parted"
|
|
Ex PA Senator Frothy Lube
Philadelphia, PA
|
Bob Burns wrote: <quoted text>OK Chicken Little, if you think the sky is falling, and giving money to governments will prop it up, go ahead give yours. "A fool and his money are soon parted" Hey moron, get your ignorant story straight. Are you: 1. Denying climate change; or, 2. Worrying about the financial and other consequences of climate change? You listen to "rumored" closet case, drug addict blimps on talk radio for your science lessons. Meanwhile the scientific consensus on climate change exceeds that on the Theory of Evolution or on the benefit to cost ratio of vaccines. Oh wait, you Tea Baggers don't "believe in" evolution of vaccines, either. My bad.
|
|
|
Frank Rizzo
Santa Rosa, CA
|
Water vapor is a far more effective greenhouse gas than C02. And there's several billions of times more water vapor in the atmosphere at any given time than C02. In addition, the C02 that is released into the atmosphere is quickly reabsorbed by the world's oceans. There's an equalibrium that is maintained naturally. It's time to regulate water vapor!
|
|
Bob Burns
China
|
Ex PA Senator Frothy Lube wrote: <quoted text> Hey moron, get your ignorant story straight. Are you: 1. Denying climate change; or, 2. Worrying about the financial and other consequences of climate change? You listen to "rumored" closet case, drug addict blimps on talk radio for your science lessons. Meanwhile the scientific consensus on climate change exceeds that on the Theory of Evolution or on the benefit to cost ratio of vaccines. Oh wait, you Tea Baggers don't "believe in" evolution of vaccines, either. My bad. Climate is always changing. Giving money to governments won't alter that
|
|
Ex PA Senator Frothy Lube
Philadelphia, PA
|
Bob Burns wrote: <quoted text>Climate is always changing. Giving money to governments won't alter that See you're inadvertently revealing how little you understand. The fact that there were forest fires prior to civilization doesn't somehow mean these days that forest fires can be caused by humans. I know that example is too abstract for you deranged, inchoate mind. As for the other moron, the earth does have carbon sinks, a new term to most of you Tea Baggers. They are getting full. The ocean's pH is changing, to the widespread detriment of the biosphere. As for water vapor as "a more effective greenhouse gas," leaving aside that claim, I fail to see how humans are putting more and more water vapor into the atmosphere.(Except by heating the planet, of course.) So that is not related to the changes being effected by human activity - climate change. You idiot.
|
|
“Liberalism is a Disease”
Since: Jul 09
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
Ex PA Senator Frothy Lube wrote: <quoted text> I just _knew_ I couldn't make it simple enough for you. Hey moron, why do you bother since you don't "believe in" climate change? Idiot, weather is two days or seven days. Climate is over time. The former has nothing to say about the latter except over time. Then it's not weather. Blip. Trend. Tea Bagger. Repeat. Don't you find it odd that YOU are the only one the thinks YOU make any sense.
|
|
“It's a Brand New Day”
Since: Feb 06
New Rochelle
|
Please wait...
Judged:
1
Ex PA Senator Frothy Lube wrote: <quoted text> See you're inadvertently revealing how little you understand. The fact that there were forest fires prior to civilization doesn't somehow mean these days that forest fires can be caused by humans. I know that example is too abstract for you deranged, inchoate mind. As for the other moron, the earth does have carbon sinks, a new term to most of you Tea Baggers. They are getting full. The ocean's pH is changing, to the widespread detriment of the biosphere. As for water vapor as "a more effective greenhouse gas," leaving aside that claim, I fail to see how humans are putting more and more water vapor into the atmosphere.(Except by heating the planet, of course.) So that is not related to the changes being effected by human activity - climate change. You idiot. There are two products of combustion; CO2, and ........??
|
|
Tell me when this thread is updated:
(Registration is not required)
Add to my Tracker
Send me an email
|