Local News: Los Angeles, CA 

 | 

Sign Up

 | 

Sign In

Calling price too high, Yankees exit Santana chase

Posted in the Dan Haren Forum

Read

87 Comments

More Dan Haren Discussions »

Comments (Page 3)

Showing posts 41 - 60 of87
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Drew

Easton, CT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#41
Dec 5, 2007
 
Pettitte should have won 20 games??? Based on what? Perhaps if he had the wherewithal to pitch more than 6 1/3, he could have wrapped up those games on his own!
paljoe00 wrote:
Having been a Yankee fan for seventy years my comments go to the heart of the "new" Yankees. I am glad they did not give up the great young talent for Santana. I don't care if the Red Sox get him, and I don't care if the Yanks fall short this seaso.
In 2007 one could look into the Yankee dugout and see smiles, and confidence. Cano and Cabrera surrounding ARod after his homer and leaping for joy.
Joba out of the bullpen and completely dominant. Pedttite who should have won 20 games that the bullpen crossed out. Arod and Jeter Hitting like mad, and Posada having his alltime best season.
No, the yanks are young, the manager is young, the front office is young. This is the future of the Yankees but it won't happen overnight. We don't want Santana... We stillhave to find a way of dumping Farnsworth and Pavano, and let Pavano be the lesson. He has been a disgrace. Keep it young stay pat, for we have the nucleus of a dynasty once again, in the maqking.
but seriously

New York, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#42
Dec 5, 2007
 
Drew wrote:
The Red Sox are a better baseball team now, obviously. Let the he Red Sox add stars! That's funny...as if the Yankees are winning with kids making the MLB minimum!
<quoted text>
I had no need for your first point, as it is useless. As for your second point, that the Red Sox are the "better" team. I believe the Yankees won the series 10-8 this year, no? And they did it with the kids making the MLB minimum! As it has been stated before, and will definitely be stated again, it is not necessarily the better team that wins. It is the hotter team. Make fun of me for being a "Yankee fan who lives in the past" as much as you want but try not to forget that the Sox were also down 3 games to 1 to the Indians. Blab all you want that it was a 7 game series. I'm not going to deny that. I'm just going to say that they were in the same position as the Yanks. Just got a little lucky they had longer to win.
HarleyRider

Addlestone, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#43
Dec 5, 2007
 
man wrote:
<quoted text>
if Sox sign Santana they should worry about what Becket will want. he lead then to 2 championships. dont thing they're that concerned over paying Manny,it no secret that although they love his production the've been trying to move him for thelast 4 years but no takers due to high salary and attitude.
i agree HughesMelky AND kennedy was high price...but as stands rightnow they have Wang, Pettite, Hughes, Kennedy, Joba, Mussina (forget Pavano i dont count onhim as player but if does that makes 7 starters).
so Wang and Pettite have starter roles. they seem committed to Joba as starter. Hughes is starter. so who goes into pen. your prized prospect that you wouldn't trade cuz he's a future star or $17million Mussina?
i say Wang, Pettite, Hughes, KEnnedy, Mussina and Joba set up for Mo in 7 & 8.
I completely agree with this, except for 1 thing. I would have Pettite, Wang, Hughes, Kennedy and then either another pitcher from the farm, or one gotten via trade/free agency, and not start Moose. Keeping Joba in the pen is key. The bullpen lost alot of games for us until Joba showed up.

Remember back in the late 90's, when other teams only had 6 innings to score on us, and the bullpen was lights out?
HarleyRider

Addlestone, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#44
Dec 5, 2007
 
Jackson FL wrote:
This whole thing is full of question marks. Is Hughes really that good. Will Joba as good a starter as he looked in relief. I think Kennedy looks good. So it's all a big question. If these guys are good and there is talent in the minors this is a good no trade. If not then a bad move. Why did we not go after Cabrera and Willis for a bunch of minor leaguer's. Put Cabrera or A-Rod on first.
Willis is now in the A.L., and about to get his head handed to him. As for first base, I'd rather have Carlos Pena (TB)
BigAl

Pennsauken, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#45
Dec 5, 2007
 
Drew wrote:
THIS is typical New York Yankees fan thinking...SO much from the Yankees??? Melky Cabrera has somehow become a superstar over the off season!. One fan on this board just said something to the effect of Melky Cabrera being successful in the post season! He has hit .158 in the post season! That's special. He's an average player. Everyone likes a great story I guess! The Yankees had the untouchable Brandon Claussen and many others...The team is very good at inflating the worth of its chips. Let's not make Phil Hughes out to be Tom Seaver! The Twins were looking for a good deal, the Yankees didn't provide them with what they were looking for. Why is that so hard to understand? It's really laugh out loud funny that anytime a team doesn't trade their franchise player for a Yankee package of mediocrity, fans scream CONSPIRACY!!! Where have the Twins stated that they would take a mere package from the Red Sox? You're listening to the NY media too much.
<quoted text>
Hey Mutsie,

Nobody is saying Cabrerea is a superstar. He is an improving CF who is already solid on defense and will be a 290-300 Hitter with 15-20 HR at least-Pretty Solid

Yanks were smart not giving in to the Twinkees demands to include Hughes, Kennedy & Cabrera. Hughes & Joba barring injury, will be solid starting pitches at the very least.

Muts are dying for any starting pitcher under the age of 40!!!

Let the Muts offer Reyes & Pelfrey for Santana.
Busey

Albertson, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#46
Dec 5, 2007
 
Drew wrote:
Pettitte should have won 20 games??? Based on what? Perhaps if he had the wherewithal to pitch more than 6 1/3, he could have wrapped up those games on his own!
<quoted text>
I know of 3 games that Mo blew the save.
Busey

Albertson, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#47
Dec 5, 2007
 
Rumor Report:

Hughes and Cano for Sheets and their top 2b prospect
Busey

Albertson, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#48
Dec 5, 2007
 
HarleyRider wrote:
<quoted text>
Willis is now in the A.L., and about to get his head handed to him. As for first base, I'd rather have Carlos Pena (TB)
They DID have him...he sucked.

Be weary of the Mitchell Report
Sign up for Top Picks deals email
man

Riverhead, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#49
Dec 5, 2007
 
HarleyRider wrote:
<quoted text>
I completely agree with this, except for 1 thing. I would have Pettite, Wang, Hughes, Kennedy and then either another pitcher from the farm, or one gotten via trade/free agency, and not start Moose. Keeping Joba in the pen is key. The bullpen lost alot of games for us until Joba showed up.
Remember back in the late 90's, when other teams only had 6 innings to score on us, and the bullpen was lights out?
yeah that was when Mo set up for Wetland. it was a 6 inning game. thaty's what we could have back with job athrowing 7 and 8 and mo throwing 9. but they seem committed to Joba as starter. it's a virtual unknown how hitters will adjust to him the 2nd and 3rd time through the order seeing him. it's tough to put Mussina in the pen. he's earning what 17-18 million this yr. how do you put that kinda $ on the back shelf?
if no Santana i keep who we have. i DONT think we should move Hughes for Haren or anyone else. Willis is gone to detroit. Boston gonna be awful hard to cope with when they throw out Becket, Santana, Schilling, Dice-k and Bucholtz/Wakefield. where's the weakness. that's ridiculous.
Uncle Jack

Pueblo, CO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#50
Dec 5, 2007
 
paljoe00 wrote:
Having been a Yankee fan for seventy years my comments go to the heart of the "new" Yankees.
Out of all of the Yankee fans who always bring up 26 rings....even this guy isn't old enough to remember all 26 championships. You Yankee fans keep talking about stuff that happened LONG before you were one of mommy's turds.
Bob

Commerce City, CO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#51
Dec 5, 2007
 
Busey--

I certainly hope the rumor of Cano and Hughes for Sheets is wrong! Ack!
Drew

Easton, CT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#52
Dec 5, 2007
 
The Red Sox won the World Series. They clearly are the best team in the game. When the Yankees win the World Series, I state that they are the better team. The Red Sox had Bucholtz throw a no hitter, Ellsbury, Pedroia and a few other not making much cash...Every team does. But, let's not pretend that these two teams spend a fortune on their players.
but seriously wrote:
<quoted text>
I had no need for your first point, as it is useless. As for your second point, that the Red Sox are the "better" team. I believe the Yankees won the series 10-8 this year, no? And they did it with the kids making the MLB minimum! As it has been stated before, and will definitely be stated again, it is not necessarily the better team that wins. It is the hotter team. Make fun of me for being a "Yankee fan who lives in the past" as much as you want but try not to forget that the Sox were also down 3 games to 1 to the Indians. Blab all you want that it was a 7 game series. I'm not going to deny that. I'm just going to say that they were in the same position as the Yanks. Just got a little lucky they had longer to win.
HarleyRider

Addlestone, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#53
Dec 5, 2007
 
Drew wrote:
Pettitte should have won 20 games??? Based on what? Perhaps if he had the wherewithal to pitch more than 6 1/3, he could have wrapped up those games on his own!
<quoted text>
Back in the day, yes that would have been true. In this day and age, pitchers usually pitch 6, 7 or sometimes 8 innings, and then give way to the relievers. It is so rare for a pitcher to pitch a complete game, it is spotlighted on ESPN every time it happens. In 2007, Pettite lost at least 5 games in which he pitched at least 6 innings, giving up 2 ER's or less.
Drew

Easton, CT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#54
Dec 5, 2007
 
So, what you're saying is all big prospects pan out. Hughes, Kennedy and Chamberlain are locks to be solid MLB pitchers? How exactly do you know Cabrera will be a .290 -.300 hitter who will up to 20 homers? Based on what? Mets don't need Santana. He should just stay with the Twins.
BigAl wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey Mutsie,
Nobody is saying Cabrerea is a superstar. He is an improving CF who is already solid on defense and will be a 290-300 Hitter with 15-20 HR at least-Pretty Solid
Yanks were smart not giving in to the Twinkees demands to include Hughes, Kennedy & Cabrera. Hughes & Joba barring injury, will be solid starting pitches at the very least.
Muts are dying for any starting pitcher under the age of 40!!!
Let the Muts offer Reyes & Pelfrey for Santana.
HarleyRider

Addlestone, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#55
Dec 5, 2007
 
man wrote:
<quoted text>
yeah that was when Mo set up for Wetland. it was a 6 inning game. thaty's what we could have back with job athrowing 7 and 8 and mo throwing 9. but they seem committed to Joba as starter. it's a virtual unknown how hitters will adjust to him the 2nd and 3rd time through the order seeing him. it's tough to put Mussina in the pen. he's earning what 17-18 million this yr. how do you put that kinda $ on the back shelf?
if no Santana i keep who we have. i DONT think we should move Hughes for Haren or anyone else. Willis is gone to detroit. Boston gonna be awful hard to cope with when they throw out Becket, Santana, Schilling, Dice-k and Bucholtz/Wakefield. where's the weakness. that's ridiculous.
We won 94 games last year, and look at how many games the bullpen (Farnsworthless) blew. What do you think our record would have been if we had Joba in the pen all year?

As for the RedSux' pitching staff, pitchers 1 - 3 are truly scary. But then again, scary is how our lineup of batters have been described for the past few years, and where did thay get us.
Bob

Commerce City, CO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#56
Dec 5, 2007
 
Drew--

I certainly agree with you that the Sox are the best team in baseball. No argument there!

A question--did you mean "But let's not pretend that these two teams DON'T spend a fortune on their players?" I think that's what you meant-if not, what did you mean?
Drew wrote:
The Red Sox won the World Series. They clearly are the best team in the game. When the Yankees win the World Series, I state that they are the better team. The Red Sox had Bucholtz throw a no hitter, Ellsbury, Pedroia and a few other not making much cash...Every team does. But, let's not pretend that these two teams spend a fortune on their players.
<quoted text>
Busey

Albertson, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#57
Dec 5, 2007
 
Bob wrote:
Busey--
I certainly hope the rumor of Cano and Hughes for Sheets is wrong! Ack!
me too Bob, me too!
Busey

Albertson, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#58
Dec 5, 2007
 
Drew wrote:
The Red Sox won the World Series. They clearly are the best team in the game. When the Yankees win the World Series, I state that they are the better team. The Red Sox had Bucholtz throw a no hitter, Ellsbury, Pedroia and a few other not making much cash...Every team does. But, let's not pretend that these two teams spend a fortune on their players.
<quoted text>
I agree the Red Sox are the best team. But winning the WS has nothing to do with it. The best team rarely wins it.

The 83 win Cardinals starring Jeff Weaver were not the best team
Drew

Easton, CT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#59
Dec 5, 2007
 
I understand that. How many did the pen save for him? It's only fair to look at his 15 or so wins and mention how many times the pen saved games for him. The role of the pitcher (both starter and reliever) has been watered down. There are no "should ofs" or "would ofs" acceptable in my view regarding starters. They don't compete like they did years ago, and therefore shouldn't have their stats compared with pitchers from the past. Relievers are just a joke. More often than not, the closer comes in with nobody on and nobody out. Big deal! How many saves would Sutter or Gossage have had if that was their role?!
HarleyRider wrote:
<quoted text>
Back in the day, yes that would have been true. In this day and age, pitchers usually pitch 6, 7 or sometimes 8 innings, and then give way to the relievers. It is so rare for a pitcher to pitch a complete game, it is spotlighted on ESPN every time it happens. In 2007, Pettite lost at least 5 games in which he pitched at least 6 innings, giving up 2 ER's or less.
Uncle Jack

Pueblo, CO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#60
Dec 5, 2007
 
but seriously wrote:
<quoted text>
I believe the Yankees won the series 10-8 this year, no? And they did it with the kids making the MLB minimum! As it has been stated before, and will definitely be stated again, it is not necessarily the better team that wins. It is the hotter team.
but seriously....winning the season series doesn't guarantee winning the division title. The Sox won the season series many times over the 10 years the Yanks won the division, so it really has little weight. As for the "hotter" team...from April - Sept., Boston was consistant. The longest losing streak they had was four games. From June - Sept., the Yanks were the best team, but over the entire season, they weren't. Yes, being hot, like the Rockies, helps, but being "consistant" is even more important.

Tell me when this thread is updated:
(Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker

Send me an email

Showing posts 41 - 60 of87
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Daily Horoscope for June 2

Libra

It's one of those difficult days when anything can and will happen. Someone you were relying on might let you down, plans could be changed at the eleventh hour or a machine could go on the blink. To make matters worse, your energy levels are very erratic, so you feel full of beans one minute and ready to go to sleep the next. Don't make the situation worse by eating foods that give you a high followed by a slump.

Get your Horoscope »