|
we the people
|
mark wrote: It's not clear to me why Ms Sowers' protest is not aimed instead at Ms Jessamy? Marty Burns takes her cues from Jessamy--I'm confused why Burns is the focus. to answer your question: jessamy is the primary target. although she is incompetent, inarticulate, ineffective and lacking in charisma she is skilled in the art of manipulation, media manipulation, back scratching, influence peddling and feminine guile. in other words she is politically strong but with a lot of weak points. these weak points are sufficient to vote her out. at this point in time margie burns is her biggest weak point. she is going to lose either way, but she will lose more by keeping burns. by keeping burns she will lose big in 2010. if she cuts burns she may be able to fool people into thinking she cares just a little longer. i hope that makes it a little more clear for you.
|
|
Parkville
|
Judged:
1
THE GOVT IS EVIL wrote: <quoted text> maybe city juries don't believe the government thugs because they(the police thugs) have more than shown themselves to be liars, thieves, rapists, murderers, etc. mark my words. the atrocities being committed by this government and covered up by the flunky media will be visited on those you in safe whitelandia. My issue with the police in Baltimore city is that they don't kill enough. The gangbangers should be be hunted down and killed like the animals they are. It really ticks me off to read about one of these thugs being taken to a hospital or shock trauma. Let the pieces of shit die in the street. Don't waste my tax money to save a memeber of the crips, bloods, or other gang.
|
|
THE GOVT IS EVIL
|
Parkville wrote: <quoted text> My issue with the police in Baltimore city is that they don't kill enough. The gangbangers should be be hunted down and killed like the animals they are. It really ticks me off to read about one of these thugs being taken to a hospital or shock trauma. Let the pieces of shit die in the street. Don't waste my tax money to save a memeber of the crips, bloods, or other gang. so you admit that "innocent until proven guilty" is a lie and has always been a lie. your honest is refreshing. dispense with the fraud called court and just kill whoever you don't like which is what police in baltimore have been doing.
|
|
aquinas
|
Yes, Burns was insensitive to say the least and Mrs. Sowers is justified in her anger. The Sowers story was so illustrative of the way city living can become a nightmare. But in the same token Burns is the public face of the Balto City State's Atty Office. Focusing on her is like the punching the clownhead microphone at the drive-thru because the food and service are bad. Your anger and attentions are misplaced. Jessamy should be the real focus here and frankly she should take the lead and publicly apologize to Mrs. Sowers and instruct Margaret Burns to do the same.
|
|
Parkville
|
THE GOVT IS EVIL wrote: <quoted text> so you admit that "innocent until proven guilty" is a lie and has always been a lie. your honest is refreshing. dispense with the fraud called court and just kill whoever you don't like which is what police in baltimore have been doing. No, there is a difference. If one of these thugs fires at police, he should be eliminated. If he does fire at police, then he isn't innocent. Any member of the crips, bloods, ms-13, etc. is a murderer, so if you can positively identify them as a member, they should be eliminated as well. There are no innocent people in gangs.
|
|
gwb
|
Judged:
1
1
I think burns and jessamy are hot. I would take these two to an all you can eat place and watch the fun start. These women are the reason baltimore criminals are not afraid to commit crimes. Yea, their hot.
|
|
mike- nottingham
|
THE GOVT IS EVIL wrote: <quoted text> maybe city juries don't believe the government thugs because they(the police thugs) have more than shown themselves to be liars, thieves, rapists, murderers, etc. mark my words. the atrocities being committed by this government and covered up by the flunky media will be visited on those you in safe whitelandia. There are no more safe places because of gangs and fools like you who make excuses for the gang bangers. Also only a very foolish African American would call for some kind of racial strife, as you seem to do, considering you only make up 13% of the population. You would be surprised how many guns the good old boys outside of the major cities have. If you are ever the victim of a crime don't call the police. Ring up some of your Homeys in th eBloods or Crips to help you out.
|
|
Surf52
|
McNasty wrote: I am so sick of that Zack Sowers cat. Yeah, thugs in Baltimore killed him. Like no one else gets killed in the city. His widow is very annoying. She should just shut up. So should many people. You should take the hint.
|
|
|
|
Surf52
|
aquinas wrote: Yes, Burns was insensitive to say the least and Mrs. Sowers is justified in her anger. The Sowers story was so illustrative of the way city living can become a nightmare. But in the same token Burns is the public face of the Balto City State's Atty Office. Focusing on her is like the punching the clownhead microphone at the drive-thru because the food and service are bad. Your anger and attentions are misplaced. Jessamy should be the real focus here and frankly she should take the lead and publicly apologize to Mrs. Sowers and instruct Margaret Burns to do the same. Pat Jessamy is drunk with power. Ain't ever gonna happen.
|
|
BLP
|
Beanster - you wrote " Alex Hamilton wrote: <quoted text> Were Mrs. Burns statements incorrect on any level? Insensitive YES, but not true?... Blaming the State Attorney Office for the death is not going to improve victim's rights. They are on the same side of the issue... " Her statements WERE incorrect, as evidenced by the release of the hospital records/notes by Zach Sowers' doctor. He refutes Burns' comments with EVIDENCE from the record. So, not only were her remarks insensitive but ALSO false. Anna Sowers is not blaming the office for Zach's death at all. Further, yes, the point is that Anna Sowers wants victims and the SA office to be on the same side. With comments like these, which are FALSE, she is basically takign the side of the monsters that killed her husband. The examiner has followed the case and has the doctor's letter, Burns' comments, etc.
|
|
Debbie M
|
Judged:
1
As a very close family friend, I am horrified at the insensitivity shown by Burns. Her comments demonstrate her absolute and unequivocal ignorance and lack of compassion. In her role as spokesperson for the city of Baltimore, she has brought shame and disgrace to her position, her office and the city.
|
|
Parkville
|
Debbie M wrote: As a very close family friend, I am horrified at the insensitivity shown by Burns. Her comments demonstrate her absolute and unequivocal ignorance and lack of compassion. In her role as spokesperson for the city of Baltimore, she has brought shame and disgrace to her position, her office and the city. What did you expect from a low-class pig?
|
|
Fire Jessamy Also
|
schlomo wrote: The article refers to 'signs written on the back of an Ehrlich campaign sign' and that one of the supporters unsuccessfully ran against Jessamy in the last election. It would appear Mr. Fenton sees this as party politics. That cheapens the reality of Ms. Burns callous statements and further trivializes what happened to Mr. Sowers. He should be ashamed of himself for adding such irrelevant drivel to his article. AMEN!!!!!
|
|
No More Burns
|
Judged:
1
1
Here is a quote from Examiner.com that sums up the political situation in Baltimore: "The minimization of the unnecessary suffering and death of Zach Sowers by a representative of Patricia Jessamy is reprehensible! How would you like if you had just went through the agonizing process of seeing a loved one slowly die because of injuries sustained in an attack and then have a PUBLIC OFFICIAL TAUNT AND VERBALLY ATTACK YOU? Oh and remember that three of the killers get to be out of jail in eight years. No doubt that would even make you more willing to kneel at the feet of Pharaoh Jessamy and take another slap to the face. Right? I mean in Baltimore we are supposed to sit here on our hands and take it like men and not question our brilliant leaders while Rome burns." http://www.examiner.com/x-284-Baltimore-Polit...
|
|
Surf52
|
Parkville wrote: <quoted text> What did you expect from a low-class pig? There's a high class of pig?
|
|
mike- nottingham
|
No More Burns wrote: Here is a quote from Examiner.com that sums up the political situation in Baltimore: "The minimization of the unnecessary suffering and death of Zach Sowers by a representative of Patricia Jessamy is reprehensible! How would you like if you had just went through the agonizing process of seeing a loved one slowly die because of injuries sustained in an attack and then have a PUBLIC OFFICIAL TAUNT AND VERBALLY ATTACK YOU? Oh and remember that three of the killers get to be out of jail in eight years. No doubt that would even make you more willing to kneel at the feet of Pharaoh Jessamy and take another slap to the face. Right? I mean in Baltimore we are supposed to sit here on our hands and take it like men and not question our brilliant leaders while Rome burns." http://www.examiner.com/x-284-Baltimore-Polit... I am not taking up for either Jesamy or Burns but things could have been a whole lot worse if this case had gone to trial in Baltimore City and those four animals were acquitted . If the trial could have been held in Federal Court or one of the Counties I'm sure no plea bagain would have been offered because of the different demographics of the juors. In Baltimore City you can never count on a conviction no matter how good a case the Prosecution has. Remember OJ?
|
|
Parkville
|
Surf52 wrote: <quoted text> There's a high class of pig? You know, I was being a little hard on pigs by calling her one.
|
|
Parkville
|
No More Burns wrote: Here is a quote from Examiner.com that sums up the political situation in Baltimore: "The minimization of the unnecessary suffering and death of Zach Sowers by a representative of Patricia Jessamy is reprehensible! How would you like if you had just went through the agonizing process of seeing a loved one slowly die because of injuries sustained in an attack and then have a PUBLIC OFFICIAL TAUNT AND VERBALLY ATTACK YOU? Oh and remember that three of the killers get to be out of jail in eight years. No doubt that would even make you more willing to kneel at the feet of Pharaoh Jessamy and take another slap to the face. Right? I mean in Baltimore we are supposed to sit here on our hands and take it like men and not question our brilliant leaders while Rome burns." http://www.examiner.com/x-284-Baltimore-Polit... Three of the animals were sentenced to 8 years, but they'll be out in 4 or 5. They should have sent them through P.G. County lockup.
|
|
mike- nottingham
|
Parkville wrote: <quoted text> Three of the animals were sentenced to 8 years, but they'll be out in 4 or 5. They should have sent them through P.G. County lockup. The PG County case has certainly quieted down. It will probably turn out that the punk accidently killed himself.
|
|
The Beanster
|
BLP wrote: Beanster - you wrote " Alex Hamilton wrote: <quoted text> Were Mrs. Burns statements incorrect on any level? Insensitive YES, but not true?... Blaming the State Attorney Office for the death is not going to improve victim's rights. They are on the same side of the issue... " Her statements WERE incorrect, as evidenced by the release of the hospital records/notes by Zach Sowers' doctor. He refutes Burns' comments with EVIDENCE from the record. So, not only were her remarks insensitive but ALSO false. Anna Sowers is not blaming the office for Zach's death at all. Further, yes, the point is that Anna Sowers wants victims and the SA office to be on the same side. With comments like these, which are FALSE, she is basically takign the side of the monsters that killed her husband. The examiner has followed the case and has the doctor's letter, Burns' comments, etc. There was no record. It was a plea agreement. The doctor's statement wasn't worth the paper it was printed on. It was uncorroborated not subject to cross examination. We don't even know if this guy examined the victim
|