Toyota Corporate in bad Shape

I don't think it will help.

Toyota needs bring back there straight axle small pickup that actually looks like a truck and not these big plastic bumpery car looking things everyones making.Just read land rover is going to redesign the defender.They say they hope they dont get it wrong.Idiots they already did.Changing something that works ......Thats the last real rugged looking truck anyone makes .

I just love you Toyota haters posting big headlines like "Toyota Corporate in Bad Shape", when the article you link to support your headline details how Toyota is changing their structure to better match the realities of today's market. Sort of like what GM is trying to do,(or should be doing).
So, while Toyota's sales are down lately due to both their quality issues as well as the result of the earthquake, they're far from "in bad shape".

The header is false and misleading.!

I did not know it was that bad.

liner wrote:

I did not know it was that bad.

Please use one of your original 15 or 20 usernames.
"Liner" belongs to someone else, long before you came on the scene.
The game you're playing is a coward's game, and rather stupid as well.

liner wrote:

I did not know it was that bad.

Obviously you didn't bother to read the article.
Otherwise you would be aware your uninformed comment has only nuisance vlue.
The header is false.

If they are switching people around like that it can't be good and if you are so afraid of truth maybe you should go to the horseshoe falls and hide out.

liner wrote:

If they are switching people around like that it can't be good and if you are so afraid of truth maybe you should go to the horseshoe falls and hide out.

Can you do anything other than nuisance posts?
Also, please use one of your original 15 or 20 usernames.
"Liner" belongs to someone else.
The game you're playing is a coward's game, and rather stupid as well.

I think this is real bad.

liner wrote:

I think this is real bad.

Care to explain your statement?
Since when is corporate restructuring "Bad"?
Every corporation on the face of this earth does it.
AS well, I seem to recall acouple of far more significant restructurings in the recent past---aka GM, Chrysler bankruptcies.
How "bad" were they?

Oh yes---by the way, imposter,.......
You are stealing another person's username.
Thieves, imposters, and dishonest posters have no credibility here.

liner wrote:

If they are switching people around like that it can't be good and if you are so afraid of truth maybe you should go to the horseshoe falls and hide out.

If you are so hung up on "truth', then read (if you can!) this link..........

http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2011/04/revi...

liner wrote:

I think this is real bad.

who cares what you think, short pants.

Reality wrote:

<quoted text>
If you are so hung up on "truth', then read (if you can!) this link..........
http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2011/04/revi...

lol April 2011 we see had that worked out for them hahaha!

Reality wrote:

<quoted text>
Care to explain your statement?
Since when is corporate restructuring "Bad"?
Every corporation on the face of this earth does it.
AS well, I seem to recall acouple of far more significant restructurings in the recent past---aka GM, Chrysler bankruptcies.
How "bad" were they?
Oh yes---by the way, imposter,.......
You are stealing another person's username.
Thieves, imposters, and dishonest posters have no credibility here.

Haha Gm and Chrslyer can kiss it! Ford and Hyundai all the way baby!

liner wrote:

<quoted text>
who cares what you think, short pants.

Is it true the fake "Liner" really does wear short pants!
Also has a Justin Bieber comb over-- and goes to all his concerts?

Regardless, the child is still an imposter.

Haha you can't argue with me.

CAUTION......Do not feed the troll!

Reality wrote:

CAUTION......Do not feed the troll!

good idea.

They are shaking up the top brass to make a public statement I think.