As Toyota Sputters, VW steers for the top

JJFADS wrote:

<quoted text> It actually looks pretty good.
http://www.chryslergroupllc.com/business/

JJFADS wrote:

<quoted text>You don’t understand a balance sheet. The company remains on track to post a loss of 350bn yen (3.9bn. I do however say kudos for reducing that by about half.

whatever wrote:

<quoted text>
Here's where I pull a JJFADS. I'm not looking at the past. I'm looking at the now and into the future. haha... Taste that medicine?=)

Judged:

1

1

1

whatever wrote:

<quoted text>
It's a pretty aggressive restructuring for the next 4 or 5 years, but they need it in order to remain a viable company.

Judged:

3

3

1

JJFADS wrote:

<quoted text>Oh come on, what personal remarks are you talking about? In this debate I left personal remarks out of it. Are you still upset about something that was said in the past?
Re points – Your points may be valid under your pretense. It has nothing to do with me or our little debate as they were off topic and placed under a faltered premise.
lighten up scooter...

Judged:

1

Vance1 wrote:

chrysler will make a huge come back in the future you just watch!!!!!!!!
Ohbomba wants them to fail...but they will not!!!
Yesterday I saw a Tundra trying to pull a travel trailer that was too big for it , It was overheating like a murtha!!!!!!!

Judged:

2

1

1

Stop It wrote:

<quoted text>
Can't get any lighter than this---evidently you're so impressed with yourself as to refuse to admit any failings in these debates.
That's just some helpful advice---take it as you wish.
Oh yeah--one more thing---that "off topic" excuse to bail out is getting a little shopworn now---you often use it whenever you're getting behind the power curve in a discussion.
(That "power curve" analogy is aviation speak for "you're losin' it"---and it applies here)

Judged:

3

3

1

JJFADS wrote:

<quoted text>Don't be upset because you lost.

Judged:

1

1

1

whatever wrote:

<quoted text>
All lies.

Judged:

2

2

1

Vance1 wrote:

<quoted text>
toyota sputter sputter sputter....dying!!!!

The Authority wrote:

Toyota just posted a second quarter profit, proof that its own turnaround is working, and they did not take any bailout funds.
Regardless, all automakers will make more money when the market rebounds as they've shed many layers of waste.
Chrysler stands no chance under Fiat control. Americans don't want Chrysler cars, they don't want Fiat cars, and they certainly don't want Chrysler-branded Fiat cars. The plan is flawed, customers have fled the brand and will shun any Italian cars masked with a badge.

Stop It wrote:

<quoted text>
Zero plus zero equals zero.
I lost nothing.
You lost your credibility.

Judged:

1

1

1

The Authority wrote:

Toyota just posted a second quarter profit, proof that its own turnaround is working, and they did not take any bailout funds.
Regardless, all automakers will make more money when the market rebounds as they've shed many layers of waste.
Chrysler stands no chance under Fiat control. Americans don't want Chrysler cars, they don't want Fiat cars, and they certainly don't want Chrysler-branded Fiat cars. The plan is flawed, customers have fled the brand and will shun any Italian cars masked with a badge.

Judged:

2

1

1

JJFADS wrote:

<quoted text>
Either you can’t read or you’re just stupid. You base a rebuttal on something I never said. You fabricated a rebuttal on utter nonsense that you created in your head. Let’s take a look at what you wrote:
“Perhasps too full of yourself to admit it, but we're used to that from you.
If you recall (or is that asking too much?), you posted at great length that the balance of trade in the US has to reverse course, ie, the US must be allowed sell more of its goods and services offshore.”
Not once did I ever say “the US has to reverse course.” I never even implied such a thing. Unfortunately you don’t encompass the skill to discern commonality. Either you’re book smart with very little common sense or you’re just plain ignorant.
Never once have you won a debate against me nor will you ever in the future. I challenge you to go back and find one instance. Hell, the posts of your latest spewed rubbish are on this very thread for all to review. You give canucks a bad name.

Judged:

2

1

1

JJFADS wrote:

<quoted text>Toyota most certainly took bailout funds from the Japanese government and tax breaks from the US government and US states.

Stop It wrote:

<quoted text>
What was left of your waning credibility just evaporated, my friend.
Like I said: "Nothing plus nothing equals nothing"
This last rant of yours speaks loudly.
You're really nothing--- just full of sh*t.
Some advice:..
Perhaps it's time to turn over this silly little job of yours to someone more worthy.

Stop It wrote:

<quoted text>
Why just 'spin' this issue at Toyota?
Was anything different for GM and Chrysler this year?
Actually, each of the Detroit Three has dined at that trough over the years, so what's new?
PSST---your bias is showing---again!
Like I said--Maybe you're past your prime?