Obama's Epic Failure

dpb wrote:

<quoted text>
You, "big tex"(lmao), are full of fecal matter. Of course with a "handle' like "big tex"(lmao, it is no wonder. Go back to Texas and suck Bush's Texan-a--ss.

What does dpb stand for? Dickless Puny Boy? That's a good name for you boy.

Big Tex wrote:

<quoted text>He's a Muslim radical African and you and all the network nrws host have your heads up his_ass.

Spoken like a true texican, with your head up your @ss. Putz. You're just another racist trying to score points with your beer drinking buddies.

You're the Racist Liberal. You're happy because you and your families welfare and unemployment free rides will be extended. You are one Pathetic Loser.

dramatech 01 wrote:

<quoted text>That's such a load of texas horse hockey. He's more of a Christian than dumbya bush ever pretended to be. So, pull your ditto head out of rush's butt, or maybe you prefer the view from there.

What does Rush have to do whith that NEGRO I was referring to. Obama is not a Christian he is a Radical Negro. That was my only point.

Big Tex wrote:

<quoted text> What does Rush have to do whith that NEGRO I was referring to. Obama is not a Christian he is a Radical Negro. That was my only point.

Radical? lol. Hardly, pal, but, if you insist, why can't he be a Radical Negro Christian? After all, you are a Big Tex Knucklehead Schmuck, right? Sounds about right to me. Oops! he just happens to be your president...that must stick in your ol' bubba craw...I LOVE IT!! Sucks to be you, huh?

Celebrate wrote:

<quoted text>Radical? lol. Hardly, pal, but, if you insist, why can't he be a Radical Negro Christian? After all, you are a Big Tex Knucklehead Schmuck, right? Sounds about right to me. Oops! he just happens to be your president...that must stick in your ol' bubba craw...I LOVE IT!! Sucks to be you, huh?

Big Tex Knucklehead Schmuck? Nah, sounds like he's just a Texas Knucklehead Schmechie, a minute male organ.

Obama Admin Silences a Ninety-Eight Page EPA Report Says Temps To Cool Until 2030
Posted by admin on July 1, 2009Cap and Trade is going to kill our country. Call your SENATOR and demand they kill this bill.

http://obamasfailures.com/

JosephOne wrote:

http://obamasfailures.com/

Way to prove Obama is human, with a website! Way to go Joseph, proud supporter of Obama.

JosephOne wrote:

Obama Admin Silences a Ninety-Eight Page EPA Report Says Temps To Cool Until 2030
Posted by admin on July 1, 2009Cap and Trade is going to kill our country. Call your SENATOR and demand they kill this bill.

GLENN BECK!!! This guy is a loose cannon and cannot be believed. Show me a credible source please.

JosephOne wrote:

Obama Admin Silences a Ninety-Eight Page EPA Report Says Temps To Cool Until 2030
Posted by admin on July 1, 2009Cap and Trade is going to kill our country. Call your SENATOR and demand they kill this bill.

LOL, uh oh Joseph, more people questioning you AND your sources. I agree, let's get some credible sources.

Isaac C wrote:

<quoted text>
LOL, uh oh Joseph, more people questioning you AND your sources. I agree, let's get some credible sources.

Glenn Beck is credible. But I guess I have to put Michael Savage stuff on huh?

JosephOne wrote:

<quoted text>
Glenn Beck is credible. But I guess I have to put Michael Savage stuff on huh?

I guess your definition and mine differ. I suppose you think Rush is a valid news source too. Both of these guys are entertainers first and foremost. They are all about themselves and bending the "truth" to fit their agenda. Not credible to me. So you got another source?

NMresident wrote:

<quoted text>
I guess your definition and mine differ. I suppose you think Rush is a valid news source too. Both of these guys are entertainers first and foremost. They are all about themselves and bending the "truth" to fit their agenda. Not credible to me. So you got another source?

I guess Keith Olberman is supposed to a good source for the left?

http://www.robgagnon.net/articles/ScripturalP...

This additional criterion for exceptional status has a legalistic air to it. It assumes that the Bible’s prohibition is limited to physical stimulation of the genitalia—an assumption that does not correlate well with Jesus’ sexual ethic. Jesus added an interior component to the prohibition of adultery with his statement about adultery of the heart. Does the prohibition of homosexual behavior get an exemption from an interior component (active homosexual desire), to say nothing of overt erotic kissing and fondling? To be consistent, one would have to maintain that the biblical prohibition of adultery does not preclude a married person from erotically kissing and fondling persons other than one’s spouse. The same logic would also have to be applied to the biblical prohibitions of incest, prostitution, and bestiality. Clearly such actions would violate the spirit, and probably the letter, of the prohibitions.

JosephOne wrote:

<quoted text>
Glenn Beck is credible. But I guess I have to put Michael Savage stuff on huh?

You need NON bias opinions for them to be considered as good articles, I mean it's great they offer a bias side and everyone knows Fox isn't going to come out and give credit to Obama where it's due. I admit I support Obama, and he has made plenty of mistakes, but so has every other President.

Isaac C wrote:

<quoted text>
You need NON bias opinions for them to be considered as good articles, I mean it's great they offer a bias side and everyone knows Fox isn't going to come out and give credit to Obama where it's due. I admit I support Obama, and he has made plenty of mistakes, but so has every other President.

I agree on presidential mistakes. And MSNBC is not exactly unbiased either. I will tell you, I voted for Bush both terms. The first term and handling for 9/11 I think he did well, I don't think many people short of a George Washington or Abraham Lincoln or FDR would have done much better or worse. But I was reluctant to vote for him a second term. I thought that the effect of dealing with the tragedy of 9/11 was too much for one man and also that he was using us christians for his own ends. I did not like either idea but at least he was a known factor. John Kerry was an unknown. Sometimes I regret that second vote. Christians stopped being all that active in Bush's second term and thought we had something. It was all a delusion.

JosephOne wrote:

<quoted text>
I agree on presidential mistakes. And MSNBC is not exactly unbiased either. I will tell you, I voted for Bush both terms. The first term and handling for 9/11 I think he did well, I don't think many people short of a George Washington or Abraham Lincoln or FDR would have done much better or worse. But I was reluctant to vote for him a second term. I thought that the effect of dealing with the tragedy of 9/11 was too much for one man and also that he was using us christians for his own ends. I did not like either idea but at least he was a known factor. John Kerry was an unknown. Sometimes I regret that second vote. Christians stopped being all that active in Bush's second term and thought we had something. It was all a delusion.

Well I agree that MSNBC is bias, I don't think really there is a non-bias opinion out there. I will say that we don't agree on George Bush, I think he didn't act or deal with 9/11 very well. I mean sure let's go and get things done, but I think he was looking for a good reason to finish his Daddy's war, and kept with the war as a political strategy to be reelected for a second term.

I think John Kerry was a bad choice for Dems, and I am glad he didn't get elected but I think he was the lesser of two evils.

I do agree that Bush's focus on Christians lacked, but then again I'm glad he didn't push to much either.

JosephOne wrote:

<quoted text>
I guess Keith Olberman is supposed to a good source for the left?

You assume I'm on the left. Bad assumption. I'm a moderate and only want the simple truth. I try to read different sources and key in on basic facts only. I even listen to Rush now and then just to hear what he has to say.