Apparently We Can't Disagree With The President {Caesar?}.

fmer505-1951 wrote:

<quoted text>There is no help for KM. He is to far gone to resuscitate!

Welll...perhaps...

Knightmare wrote:

Okay, so Justice Scalia disagrees with President Obama and everyone gets bent out of shape over it.
Seriously people.
I guess this President has become a modern day Caesar.
{Enter in dpb, davy and santa fe...the three lackeys of Obama in New Mexico.}

No Supreme Court Justice has ever publicly disagreed with a President in such stark, disrespectful terms.

This is the paragon of virtue who went duck hunting with Dick Cheney while deciding a case involving Cheney's claims of executive privilege.

Scalia is off the rails. Some legal scholars (quoting people inside the Court) believe he is very upset because he would like to resign from the court to make his fortune working for Fox as an analyst/commentator, but can't resign as long as we have a Democratic president.

walterfm wrote:

<quoted text>
No Supreme Court Justice has ever publicly disagreed with a President in such stark, disrespectful terms.
This is the paragon of virtue who went duck hunting with Dick Cheney while deciding a case involving Cheney's claims of executive privilege.
Scalia is off the rails. Some legal scholars (quoting people inside the Court) believe he is very upset because he would like to resign from the court to make his fortune working for Fox as an analyst/commentator, but can't resign as long as we have a Democratic president.

Of course President Obama scolded the Supreme Court publicly as well pretty heavily, in his state of the union speech. In other words President Obama started it.

Knightmare wrote:

<quoted text>
Of course President Obama scolded the Supreme Court publicly as well pretty heavily, in his state of the union speech. In other words President Obama started it.

he started it LOL

any thinking person knows that the Citizens United decision was just crazy - not justifiable under precedent or original intent -just pure corporate toady corruption.

Nan nah wrote:

<quoted text>
he started it LOL
any thinking person knows that the Citizens United decision was just crazy - not justifiable under precedent or original intent -just pure corporate toady corruption.

Uh-huh...just like the corporate insurances that now have IRS enforced guaranteed rolls through taxpayers. Just another type of bailout going by another name. But not bailing out the people, bailing our the corporations. Again. And you and others have put us all on the hook for that kind of corruption.

Gee, thanks...{everyone say thanks to santa fe and others like him for the nice job of putting us further under big brother, corporations and government...all paid by us...the taxpayer...well the ones that do pay taxes anyway}.