Why Are White Americans So Ugly?

SEXYBLKWOMAN wrote:

Blah! I don't care about opinions prove how science has proved that the bible is true? As of now majority of scientist disagree.
<quoted text>

Simple...has the bible changed for the sake of science? no...Cause the word of God never changes!

As time advances and science advance then will we come with understanding of the new concept!

called

"intelligent design" unlike Evolution! everything intelligent demands and intelligent mind!

the bible!

Free float of earth in space (Job 26:7).

SCIENCE NOW

Free float of earth in space.

SCIENCE THEN

Earth sat on a large animal.

LOL

THE BIBLE
The earth is a sphere
(Isaiah 40:22).

SCIENCE NOW

The earth is a sphere

SCIENCE THEN

The earth was a flat disk.

LOL

THE BIBLE
Incalculable number of stars (Jeremiah 33:22).

SCIENCE NOW
Incalculable number of stars

before...

Only 1,100 stars.

LOL

enormous ding dong

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

and yet another white guy with a huge bulge!

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

D8mb d8mb that isn't black skin that is dark skin id8t, look at the difference between their boots and their skin and you will notice their boots are darker than them, seriously you are a tard.

Even white people don't have white skin you silly fool! There are only shades of brown and ruddey colors.

Also once again your post is a fail!

http://archaeologyinfo.com/human-evolution-ti ...

http://www.livescience.com/1411-monkey-dna-po ...

When you debunk Fossil findings and DNA than you will have a point until than your post are FAILURES.

whiteskinned polynesian wrote:

<quoted text>LOL keep telling youself that...
But if you thikn this is not black skin...We'll then
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
keep denying it ma'am! LOL
really fossils!
like I said you know very little about how evolution gets it's theories from!
READ
The fossil record does not support the theory of evolution and is one of the flaws in the theory of evolution.
READ
http://www.takeonit.com/question/169.aspx
READ
The main methods that scientists use to estimate the age of rocks and fossils are radioactive dating and stratigraphic dating. Radioactive dating uses the known rate of decay of an isotope to determine the age of a fossil and can give you an absolute date. Stratigraphic dating looks at the geologic layers above and below the fossil or rock to give their approximate age. Unless you are a scientist with a large budget, radioactive dating is out of reach for most people.
LOL dumb idiot it's due to geologic layers where the fossil is found

whiteskinned polynesian wrote:

<quoted text>What lol! watch....
http://www.youtube.com/watch...

How does this disprove evolution? These are only 5 thousand years older than Egyptian civilization really what is your point.

whiteskinned polynesian wrote:

<quoted text>scientist have no choice really...cause what theory are you going to base your theories on? lol
truth is outside of 6 to 10,000 years it's all mambo jumbo! lord of the rings just so tales of men minds...

Umm like I said produce the evidence or shuddey. Evolution has been proven the bible has not.

whiteskinned polynesian wrote:

THE BIBLE
The earth is a sphere
(Isaiah 40:22).
SCIENCE NOW
The earth is a sphere
SCIENCE THEN
The earth was a flat disk.
LOL

Yep this isn't proving anything.

Because that chalky white skin is clearly ugly. It looks gross and they always look sick. They look like pigs especially when they blush. They obviously wish they were black or they wouldn't spend 5 hours trying to get a tan, butt implants and lip injections. I would hate to have that pancake butt. Gross.

SEXYBLKWOMAN wrote:

<quoted text>
Yep this isn't proving anything.

LOL proves how science in 1800 was like compared to today LOL the bible never changes

SEXYBLKWOMAN wrote:

<quoted text>
Beetch what the fck are you talking about? Fossils are bones dingbat! Not stones, evolution is proven through fossils and DNA
<quoted text>
Ret8ard its not stones you fcking id8t they are bones! And its a well known fact that they can not only date these bones but extract DNA samples from them too, which is not the point anyways.
<quoted text>
LMBAO silly f**l self hate is claiming that you are something youre not, that is self hate, you claimed your mom looked white if she looks anything like you than you don't look white.
Saying that there is no such thing as black skin is a fact.
The term black denotes RACE OR ethnicity to skin complexion you ret8ard.
And what does Sudan have to do with anything? So basically you are saying people like Beyonce look like Sudanese women? SMFH your logic just like you are failures.

LOL!

again did you READ what they said the radio carbon dating of fossils is not SCIENCE SO ME HOW RADIO CARBON DATING IS GOOD SCIENCE!

HOW DO THEY FIGURE OUT THE AGE OF THE FOSSILS YOU DUMB DING BAT! ANSWER THE QUESTION?

IT'S FROM THE LAYERS OF EARTH OF WHERE THIS FOSSILS ARE FOUND HUH?

go on show me how they figure out if it's 20 million years or 50? or 190 million years!

man for someone who ACTS like you know what you talking about!

SEXYBLKWOMAN wrote:

<quoted text>
How does this disprove evolution? These are only 5 thousand years older than Egyptian civilization really what is your point.

LOL how dumb are you? the Japanese pyramids are BIGGER than the ones in Egypt in fact the slabs and complexity of design means MAN WAS NOT ADVANCED TO DO SUCH ACTIONS!

The Scientific Case Against Evolution

Belief in evolution is a remarkable phenomenon. It is a belief passionately defended by the scientific establishment, despite the lack of any observable scientific evidence for macroevolution (that is, evolution from one distinct kind of organism into another).

EXPLAIN THAT? HOW COME YOU CAN BELIEVE IN EVOLUTION WHEN MACRO EVOLUTION IS NOT BEEN PROVEN I CAN SHOW YOU 1000 EVIDENCE THAT SHOW SCIENCE IS NOW ONE WITH THE TEACHINGS OF THE BIBLE NOW FIND ME SOME EVIDENCE FOR

Marco evolution? do you even know what you talking about lol!

example!

First of all, the lack of a case for evolution is clear from the fact that no one has ever seen it happen. If it were a real process, evolution should still be occurring, and there should be many "transitional" forms that we could observe. What we see instead, of course, is an array of distinct "kinds" of plants and animals with many varieties within each kind, but with very clear and -- apparently -- unbridgeable gaps between the kinds. That is, for example, there are many varieties of dogs and many varieties of cats, but no "dats" or "cogs." Such variation is often called microevolution, and these minor horizontal (or downward) changes occur fairly often, but such changes are not true "vertical" evolution.

:D MARCO EVOLUTION IS STILL A FAIRY TALE OF DARWIN NOT SCIENCE

SEXYBLKWOMAN wrote:

<quoted text>
Yep this isn't proving anything.

lol!

more bible fact proven by science! not taught in schools! cause then people start realizing nothing was by accident! LOL

The First Law of Thermodynamics established (Genesis 2:1-2). The First Law states that the total quantity of energy and matter in the universe is a constant. One form of energy or matter may be converted into another, but the total quantity always remains the same. Therefore the creation is finished, exactly as God said way back in Genesis.

The first three verses of Genesis accurately express all known aspects of the creation (Genesis 1:1-3). Science expresses the universe in terms of: time, space, matter, and energy. In Genesis chapter one we read: "In the beginning (time) God created the heavens (space) and the earth (matter)...Then God said, "Let there be light (energy)." No other creation account agrees with the observable evidence.

THIS MY FAVORITE VERSE AND NEWTON WAS A MAN OF GOD! WHO FIGURED THIS OUT!

Light can be divided (Job 38:24). Sir Isaac Newton studied light and discovered that white light is made of seven colors, which can be "parted" and then recombined. Science confirmed this four centuries ago - God declared this four millennia ago!

Ocean currents anticipated (Psalm 8:8). Three thousand years ago the Bible described the "paths of the seas." In the 19th century Matthew Maury - the father of oceanography - after reading Psalm 8, researched and discovered ocean currents that follow specific paths through the seas! Utilizing Maury's data, marine navigators have since reduced by many days the time required to traverse the seas.

SBW! SHOW ME 5 EXAMPLES OF

MARCO EVOLUTION! BACK IT UP WITH SCIENCE! LOOOOL! AS POSTED ABOVE! AND YOU WON'T COME WITH ONE!!!!

Ndeedz wrote:

<quoted text>
King Tut was most likely of European descent. Not that it really matters...
Blacks seem to find it "upsetting" though..

Of course he is...Even Evolution teaches that the structures of Egypt was built by an intelligent an advanced race...Guess who

UruEuWauWau wrote:

<quoted text>
Kekkekeekekkeke ;-D Nah, ya worthless phaggy kiddo surely tryina hard mah style, aight?! ;-D & now ga fugly as usual I rape y'all gypsy motha holes while ya gettin' lost ;-D Na maika ti putkata mirizliva Bulgarska ciganska ot Sofiiskoto geto ;-D 6e vruti6 svrki dokat ya jebem make ti na Okolovrustnotom s golemio cren Afrikanskom hui ;-D Valeu Brasil

Kekkekeekekkeke ;-D Nah, ya worthless phaggy kiddo surely tryina hard mah afro-Eclitorian African gypsy phaggy nigca low cost low iq monkey's arse style, aight?! ;-D & now ga fugly as usual I rape y'all gypsy afro-Eclitorian African nigca low cost low iq monkey's motha holes while ya gettin' lost ;-D Na maika ti putkata mirizliva Bulgarska ciganska ot Sofiiskoto geto ;-D 6e vruti6 svrki dokat ya jebem mangalske make ti na Okolovrustnotom s golemio cren afro-Eklitorianski Afrikanski mangalski pedalski neg1rski t1pi hui ;-D sta je bre izdrkani pederski majmunski kurcicu, koji ti je bre ovo kurac od majmunskog jezika dok te jebem nogom u izdrkana pederska nasrana ciganska bugarska ustasca?!? mnogo bre gotivis moju afrobrazilijansku nogu u tvojim izjebanim ciganskim bugarskim ustascima, lepo je to. ;-D Valeu Brasil

SEXYBLKWOMAN wrote:

<quoted text>
How does this disprove evolution? These are only 5 thousand years older than Egyptian civilization really what is your point.

Kekekekekkke ;-D what evolution?!? Ya retarded monkey's azz never got beyond prim8 point w/ that wig on ya dumb ugly cohckhead. ;-D 6e izeba cqlato ti gqvursko bqlo maimunsko semeistvo i sled tva da vi amerikankite maimuni praim na sapun Kekekkkekekkke ;-D Valeu Brasil

UruEuWauWau wrote:

<quoted text>
Kekekekekkke ;-D what evolution?!? Ya retarded monkey's azz never got beyond prim8 point w/ that wig on ya dumb ugly cohckhead. ;-D 6e izeba cqlato ti gqvursko bqlo maimunsko semeistvo i sled tva da vi amerikankite maimuni praim na sapun Kekekkkekekkke ;-D Valeu Brasil

Kekekkekekekeke ;-D Ya worthless phaggy than 1 pesos for human traffickin thru S.America lil kiddo BRA wannabe fake gypsy ghetto thug ;-D & ya hidin' in da stinky Sofia surely makin' ya hood rat ;-D I simply whippin' yo stinky motha holes w/ mah black Afro-Ecuadorian banana in da hood ;-D Valeu Brasil

whiteskinned polynesian wrote:

<quoted text>LOL proves how science in 1800 was like compared to today LOL the bible never changes

Yawn* still waiting for you to prove the words of the bible.

Ndeedz wrote:

<quoted text>
King Tut was most likely of European descent. Not that it really matters...
Blacks seem to find it "upsetting" though..

WRONG BEETCH! King Tut was never and will never be a White European! King Tut as an Afroasiatic black male just like the majority of the Egyptians and have very little to do with your people who only produced civilizations like Greece and Rome.