May 12, 2008
Stock holdings force justices to skip a case
“This decision is particularly disturbing because the law was specifically designed to cure the problem of justices being reluctant to sell certain stocks because of capital gains consequences.”
For one day at least, a Supreme Court case came down to the justices' investment ideas, not their legal philosophies. via South Florida Sun-Sentinel
Comments
Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.
| Topic | Updated | Last By | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gas Price Forecast Grim: $4 a Gallon This Summer | 15 hr | Todd | 7 |
| Supreme Court Reduces Damages Awarded in Exxon ... | Mon | Merle Savage | 1 |
| Alabama Court Sides with Gov. Riley In Budget D... | Jul 5 | BuddyDuh | 1 |
| No title | Jul 5 | Gary | 4 |
| Exxon Mobil Report Fuels Panic on Street (from Jul '07) | Jul 2 | People | 4 |
| Exxon Valdez Supreme Court decision breakdown -... | Jul 2 | bighrqueen | 16 |
| Kucinich: 'We went to war for the oil companies' | Jul 1 | Pdamerica org | 52 |

