Here ALL the truth, " the words speak for THEMSELF": The mom's WITHNESSES, Maria Jose Carrascosa. Peter Innes is the only one GUILTY after this!!!

Read the conclusions AFTER LISTENING TO THE RECORDINGS

http://www.caso-carrascosa.com/testigos_in.ht...

Conclusions. http://www.caso-carrascosa.com/testigos_in.ht...

1. Supposedly:“The District attorney of the New Jersey case against Maria Jose Carrascosa, Carol Cotono, compelled the Witnesses sending Police Sergeant Charles Ryan to threaten them at their homes. She wanted to make them sign Depositions against Maria José through her attorneys in a Court. Therefore, this means rigging the Popular Jury and Judge Donald Venezia himself”.

2. Unconditional support to Peter Innes by Judge Edward Torack. That is why all of Maria Jose’s attorneys were never against his "protected" citizen, though he had battered her. But the last one of them, Scott Finckenauer, is the one who having all these documented evidences NEVER highlighted them in any of the New Jersey courts. We suppose he was thus trying to achieve his own goal:“cleaning” his working file: his attorney's License had been WITHDRAWN from Him for 3 months in year 2002. This attorney did not contact María José’s first lawyers Lesnevich & Marzano-Lesnevich, LLC and in the last year he NEVER spoke directly with the Carrascosa Family. He limited himself to report to the EFE Agency about everything that was going on.

http://www.antena3noticias.com/PortalA3N/noti...

Conclusiones. http://www.caso-carrascosa.com/testigos.htm

1. Supuestamente:“La Fiscal del caso de Nueva Jersey contra Maria Jose Carrascosa, Carol Cotono coacciono a los Testigos enviando al Sargento de Policia Charles Ryan a amenazarlos a su casa, y queriendoles hacer firmar Declaraciones en contra de Maria Jose a traves de sus abogados en una Corte, por lo que esto significa una manipulacion al Jurado Popular y al propio Juez Donald Venezia”.

2. Apoyo incondicional a Peter Innes del Juez Edward Torack. Por lo que todos los abogados de Maria Jose NUNCA fueron contra su ciudadano “protegido” aunque la maltrato. Pero el ultimo de ellos Scott Finckenauer, es quien teniendo todos estos testimonios documentados NUNCA los saco a relucir en ninguna de las Cortes de Nueva Jersey, suponemos cumpliendo asi su propio objetivo:“limpiar” su expediente laboral: Le fue RETIRADA su Licencia de abogado durante 3 meses en el año 2002. Este abogado no contactó con los primeros abogados de María José, Lesnevich & Marzano-Lesnevich, LLC y en el último año, NUNCA habló directamente con la Familia Carrascosa, limitándose a informar a la Agencia EFE de todo lo que iba sucediendo.