Child advocate speaks on Octomom lawsuit

"Petersen, who as a child played Jeff Stone on "The Donna Reed Show" and was a Mouseketeer, said his experiences as a child actor led him to forge a life championing the rights of children in the entertainment business."

Yeah, he champions causes now to stay employed since Hollywood cast him aside. He wasn't complaining when he was on a TV show.....

When he was on TV, he was a kid and a minor himself at the mercy of adults and **their** decision making.

Shouldn't Nadya have THOUGHT about the financial aspects of raising children when she ALREADY had SIX at her MOMMA'S home, ON FOOD STAMPS, before she went and PAID for a whole new, BIGGER BATCH of kids?
Cry me a river, Nadya. YOU got what you wanted, now figure it out WITHOUT pimping your kids, asshole.

I think he is in the right and the children's interests need to be insured.

olden atwoody - paul peterson is acting upon a situation in which everyone just gives lip service regarding the babies, especially octomom and her atty. Again, her plan to live on donations and public money backfired! It's not our fault she had 8 babies but now those babies and we hardworking citizens are footing the bill. It's disgusting to have watched her spend money on herself. For pete's sake instead of being at home, she was out getting a tattoo! Instead of being at home, she was out with a camera crew filming her "interest" in guys in uniforms and trying to look dreamy to boot! She is forever stuck in the sad situaion that she chose to create. It is what it is...and Nadya needs to do more HERSELF to support those kids.

Actually I'm suprised that a washed up actor, desperate for attention himself, was even allowed to file this suit.. He certainly has no legal standing.
Suleman should appeal it to the Supreme Court because what Petersen is doing is a clear violation of her family's rights.
If the Superior Court's decision is allowed to stand, it means people can seize your children just because they don't like your morals or they don't like what you say and they don't even have to be related or live near you.

SugarPlum

Great post, but I don't think it will ever happen. Her older kids hate being in front of the camera, all 3 have lashed out at the photographer with their fists.

Those kids had no structure before their mom came home with 8 new babies,(mom is using the term lightly) The house was a mess and she blamed her mom, saying she had been in the hospital. Unless it was her moms fault she was in the hospital she needs to take responsibility for what she has done.

I was waiting through the FOX not-special, every time she left the house the blip read The babies were home with the nanny's. Should have read the babies are home with the nanny's again. the babies are home with the nanny's still... The babies are always in the care of the nannies because the frivolous breeder who gave birth to them doesn't take care of them...
She's much to busy squeezing the last 2 or 3 out of her 15 minutes. She is going to find she calls the paps and nobody came...

Loser - Paul Peterson is behind the Coogan Laws that protect child actors and children who are being regularly filmed from being pimped by their parents as little meal tickets. Perhaps you should do a little research first. He is not asking for her children to be taken away - he is just wanting to see someone appointed to oversee their financial interests and their physical and emotional wellbeing while they are being filmed and that later on, the children will have something to show for that time they spent on film. If Nadya wants to get out of complying with the laws of the state she lives in when in regards to the welfare of her children, then she should move to a state that has no such laws. Otherwise, Paul Peterson DOES have legal standing to request that the entertainment laws are abided by, since Nadya doesn't seem to have any interest in compliance beyond what she can milk for herself out of her "little opportunities."

Loser wrote:

Actually I'm suprised that a washed up actor, desperate for attention himself, was even allowed to file this suit.. He certainly has no legal standing.
Suleman should appeal it to the Supreme Court because what Petersen is doing is a clear violation of her family's rights.
If the Superior Court's decision is allowed to stand, it means people can seize your children just because they don't like your morals or they don't like what you say and they don't even have to be related or live near you.

Your name says it all. You are a loser! Does your mommy know you're on the computer, moron?

JUST OFF THE WENCH..

If Paul Petersen really wanted to HELP the octuplets all he had to do was go to Nadya and help her get the Coogan account or any other Legal forms he felt she needed. But NO he had to go and sue her. Some help huh?

"Czech said Suleman has no choice but to enter into lucrative filming contracts because she needs money to support her large family."

Not to mention the nice big double dip chunk Czech gets off the 14 babies backs acting as their lawyer, agent and PR rep.
Lucky are the clients who get to have this distinguished barrister represent them in court.

Hey, Check, how much did Toxomom spend on that ghastly laundrybag she showed up in on the beach? Or the latest in a very long line of Hollister clown suits?

If you as a lawyer are concerned about how your client is going to get money to support her kids, why is it you never comment on how your client is spending it NOW for us all to see.
She never is photographed wearing the same designer clothes twice.

How do you as a representative for the financial interests of 14 babies let their mother go to a court appearance about their fuure FINANCES wearing $500 sunglasses and $400 flats?
What makes you think that there is anyone who has any positive interest in this idiotic bling-crazed gameskank?
You think there is actually going to be an audience for How I Locked My Mom in a Car Trunk While Dissing Kate Gosselin -- Part Two?

And it obviously isn't Gosselin who needs to wear a Rubberband Size 2 Carcover Burqa to the beach.
What does it say about your client , the indigent mother of 14 that all her attention is centered on the important things --crashing Michael Jackson's funeral and bad-mouthing another more successful mom instead of ever publicly focusing on anything every normal mother does--her own kids.

Wait until these nannies figure out how much they can make by telling everyone else the conditions those poor kids are in . And every thing they lack while ther mother plows under more and more crappe.
How does it feel to get paid by a client who gives the impression that she had had a litter of kids so that babies could support her from their first breath..

Loser wrote:

Actually I'm suprised that a washed up actor, desperate for attention himself, was even allowed to file this suit.. He certainly has no legal standing.
Suleman should appeal it to the Supreme Court because what Petersen is doing is a clear violation of her family's rights.
If the Superior Court's decision is allowed to stand, it means people can seize your children just because they don't like your morals or they don't like what you say and they don't even have to be related or live near you.

Suleman's own PR team hired him, to help keep her in the news.

The 14 babies, were and are sulimans answer to living high on the hog' on the American $$$$$ Thank God for Patterson and Allread.

This woman knew exactly what she was doing. When I first heard she had given birth, I remember telling my mom....those poor kids. Their private lives are over without even starting. Parents who have their kids in movies, etc...don't do it for the children...they are looking for the easy way out......I have twins and have been approached several times, but is it worth it having these children miss school all for a lousy commercial? I don't think so....

sltr wrote:

If Paul Petersen really wanted to HELP the octuplets all he had to do was go to Nadya and help her get the Coogan account or any other Legal forms he felt she needed. But NO he had to go and sue her. Some help huh?

Sltr - Alred and Peterson said they would drop the suit if Nadya appointed a suitable guardian herself before it ever got to court in August. Guess what? She didn't find a guardian for the kids - nor did she set up Coogan Accounts for them either.

Every time you see this so called mother someone
else is taking care of her kids. While her dillusional nonsense sputtering fat lip mouth is flapping about why is everyone so interested in me?
Look at the living condition of this so called "Family" looks like bedlam or some scene from a charles dickens play.

73Olds98 wrote:

<quoted text>
Sltr - Alred and Peterson said they would drop the suit if Nadya appointed a suitable guardian herself before it ever got to court in August. Guess what? She didn't find a guardian for the kids - nor did she set up Coogan Accounts for them either.

Way back in the time before 8 babies were pulled out of 1 woman in a single birthing event The Coogan Law went into effect so child actors didn't give up their youth while their parents live high off of their earnings only to wake up at 18 years old with a half rate education, no job prospects and no money in the bank. This was also the days before something called reality TV reared it's spiked head.

As the babies are home with the nanny's.

Please don't ream me if this information is dated, The Coogan Law didn't apply to this more invasive than a colonoscopy form of entertainment. Way back in the day initiators of the Coogan Law probably would have laughed and said "No one wants to watch some idiot who intentionally gave birth to a litter as she goes about her day, getting her nails done, buying a grand worth of make-up in 1 stop and replacing her starving student wardrobe with a whole new mom of 14 designer only wardrobe" As they roll their collective eyes.

As the babies are home with the nanny's.

If Coocan applied she would have no say in the children's acct's being set up. This fool has shown bad judgement every step of the way.(I won't even go into having 8 fertilized eggs implanted with 6 growing kids already at home). Allowing 50 or so reporters and camera men in the house when she brought the first 2 babies home. Moving to a nice newer 2 story house just 1 block off a busy street. Instead of a single floor in a gated community.

WHADAHECK wrote:

Every time you see this so called mother someone
else is taking care of her kids. While her dillusional nonsense sputtering fat lip mouth is flapping about why is everyone so interested in me?
Look at the living condition of this so called "Family" looks like bedlam or some scene from a charles dickens play.

She is one of the most self centered, clueless people I have ever seen...
Allowing ROL to film her medically fragile babies as many hours a day, as many hours straight as they wanted to.

There is no way in hell those 14 children are going to grow up mentally and emotionally intact. The babies were 19 weeks old and Not'ama couldn't even tell them apart!! And she who hates labels but called one of her babies a glutton and a pig.(He was probably already using food to make up for the lack of love he got from his frivolous breeder.) And another, THE ULTIMATE CRY BABY, her 18 week old baby girl was labeled a cry baby, by her mommy who is supposed to love her.(Can't think of a single thing that baby has to cry about.)

SUPER NANNY'S do we have a job for you!!. Steady employment available for the next 18 years. Oh BTW you will be expected to duck out of the shot every time Not'ama is on camera so keep those reflexes lubed up. And be sure not to make too big of a fuss over your little charges, or you will be called obsessive and you will be bounced for it. You will collectively be referred to as "MY NANNY". As in I love MY NANNY, she allows me all this ME TIME. As in, I need MY nails done. Later Gator.

THE CHILDREN WERE HOME WITH THE NANNY.

Loser wrote:

Actually I'm suprised that a washed up actor, desperate for attention himself, was even allowed to file this suit.. He certainly has no legal standing.
Suleman should appeal it to the Supreme Court because what Petersen is doing is a clear violation of her family's rights.
If the Superior Court's decision is allowed to stand, it means people can seize your children just because they don't like your morals or they don't like what you say and they don't even have to be related or live near you.

Yeah, Loser do you have any idea what Peterson is doing? He doesn't want her kids, he doesn't want to take her kids away from her.(in the context of the conversation anyway.) What he feels personally is his own business.

I'm sorry I just took your title and gave it to Not'ama, here I give it back.

He simply wants the babies funds to be kept in their own accounts, so their idiot mother doesn't blow all their hard earned money on lip plumping and designer duds.