7th DWI bound for district court

The man deserves no less than three years if convicted! Seriously, 7 DWIs? I have sero sympathy for people such as him.

Why even waste the tax payers money on a trial.. everyone one knows he won't spend one day in prison.

Our courts have allowed this man and lots of others like him to continue their path of destruction for years, to what end? I have a relative with 9 DWIs and they finally locked him up. Our judges and politicians all promise crackdowns, but, here is a good example--7 DWIs. Lucky he hasnt killed someone.

Amazed wrote:

Lucky he hasnt killed someone.

Yet.

The police did their job, now it is time for the courts to lock this man up.

Confiscate and sell any vehicle that he is caught driving, and if someone lets him drive their car, then they deserve to loose it also. After 7 DWI's, why is this man still on the roads. Maybe the judges and Da's have a pool going where the winner correctly predicts the date that he actually kills someone.

Thats it? 3 years? That is such bull crap! It should be 10 years PER DWI!!!!

Jade wrote:

Thats it? 3 years? That is such bull crap! It should be 10 years PER DWI!!!!

A little harsh, but then after 2 convictions,(concidering no injuries or damage committed, I fully agree. This is pathedic, and he cried that he came from a funeral, and drank a case. I've never been to a drunkin funeral before VERY HONORABLE if even true.

lcirishman wrote:

Confiscate and sell any vehicle that he is caught driving, and if someone lets him drive their car, then they deserve to loose it also. After 7 DWI's, why is this man still on the roads. Maybe the judges and Da's have a pool going where the winner correctly predicts the date that he actually kills someone.

I agree. However, I do wish people would learn the difference of "loose" and "lose"
LOOSE is when something isn't tied tight.
LOSE would be the proper word here.
Just a pet peeve, but it distracts when I am reading an opinion.

oh, you know...just a case of beer, that's it. lol

Drinking because he came from a funeral? Oh Please!! Suck it up, BE A MAN! You can't solve anything by drinking your sorrows. You drunk and get a hang over and feel like crap and feelings are where you left them. Dumb a_ss drunk!!!!

Tired of it wrote:

The man deserves no less than three years if convicted! Seriously, 7 DWIs? I have sero sympathy for people such as him.

you should have no patience for our "judges" who let them off again and again

George used to be a really nice looking guy but I haven't seen him for a while. I'm sure if he's let alcohol get to him and has gone down the tubes, he's not nice looking any longer. Probably looks like a street drunk now. Too bad. Grow up all you Parrishes, it's long over due.

I wish the newspaper would print each judge & result of hearing this guy had for DWI. Then we could target the lax judges as people who never get our votes again. Of course, you can automatically include some of them we know as no-prison judges...but I would still like to know who let this drunk drive the streets AGAIN the first 6 times!

It's a slow ugly painful death when the liver gives way to cirrhosis. He's already made his death sentence. A sorry sad way to go down.

Common Sense wrote:

I wish the newspaper would print each judge & result of hearing this guy had for DWI. Then we could target the lax judges as people who never get our votes again. Of course, you can automatically include some of them we know as no-prison judges...but I would still like to know who let this drunk drive the streets AGAIN the first 6 times!

www.nmcourts.com will give you the charges, court, judge etc.

Amazed wrote:

Our courts have allowed this man and lots of others like him to continue their path of destruction for years, to what end? I have a relative with 9 DWIs and they finally locked him up. Our judges and politicians all promise crackdowns, but, here is a good example--7 DWIs. Lucky he hasnt killed someone.

Very fortunate indeed that no one has been hurt.

wake up wrote:

<quoted text>
I agree. However, I do wish people would learn the difference of "loose" and "lose"
LOOSE is when something isn't tied tight.
LOSE would be the proper word here.
Just a pet peeve, but it distracts when I am reading an opinion.

I am with you on that.

7 dwi's what's he get for his 8th???? a nice plaque with his name on it??? court systems are a joke!

Clark Kent wrote:

<quoted text>
I am with you on that.

And, is there any better way to let everyone know you're a hick and ignorant than the way you use "seen" & "saw"?