|
“In Search of Truthiness”
Since: Dec 08
Allentown
ISP:
Verona, NJ
|
Bottle Top wrote: You do understand that over the top costumes are NOT the norm for gay, don't you? The media (and those who are anti-gay) love to select the photographs of the most flmaboyant, over the top people to "represent" gays. If the biggest beef you have with gays are the most flamboyant of queens, then you can choose to not attend a gay pride parade or event. Problem solved! Have a good weekend.
|
|
“In Search of Truthiness”
Since: Dec 08
Allentown
ISP:
Verona, NJ
|
what if wrote: <quoted text>
ADA defines a disabled person as one who:(1) has a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities.
If you can't get married (i.e. are substantially limited in a major life activity) because you only find attraction in those who are the same sex (either a mental or physical defect, because homosexuality is not a choice, and it cannot be natural since humans would have become extinct a very long time ago if it were), then you fit the accepted definition of a disabled person. and do you know what the ADA defines as a "Life Activity"? The non-exhaustive list of major life activities includes caring for oneself, performing manual tasks, seeing, hearing, eating, sleeping, walking, standing, lifting, bending, speaking, breathing, learning, reading, concentrating, thinking, communicating and working. The act also lists major bodily functions including, but not limited to, functions of the immune system, normal cell growth, digestive, bowel, bladder. Marriage is nowhere on that list, Einstein. Try again.
|
Since: Mar 08
Austin, TX
|
what if wrote: <quoted text>Being gay is not natural, so if it's not a choice, it must be a birth defect.
Many people are born with birth defects, but you don't see them sitting around in their wheelchairs, or in their sterile, plastic bubble environments, feeling sorry for themselves, whining and crying how they'd like to go outside for a walk. Suck it up, gay people! Accept that you have a disability, learn to live with it, and, oh he11, go ahead and park in a handicap stall every once in a while if it'll make you feel better about yourselves. Actually, your bigotry towards millions of Americans is what is unnatural and abnormal. See how that works?
|
|
“Friend of Dorothy”
Since: Nov 07
Salina, Kansas
ISP:
Salina, KS
|
what if wrote: <quoted text>
ADA defines a disabled person as one who:(1) has a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities.
If you can't get married (i.e. are substantially limited in a major life activity) because you only find attraction in those who are the same sex (either a mental or physical defect, because homosexuality is not a choice, and it cannot be natural since humans would have become extinct a very long time ago if it were), then you fit the accepted definition of a disabled person. Are you this much of an idiot when discussing any subject, or is this a special display just for us? Your contention that we are somehow disabled because we "can't" get married because we are same sex attracted, would be laughable if you weren't so sadly taking your idiocy seriously. The reason we "can't" get married is not that we are same sex attracted, but because idiots like you refuse to allow two people who are otherwise legally eligible to marry, not to, simply because they are of the same sex. If this is a disability, it is one cruelly designed by the likes of you. The reality is that same sex couples have been devoting their lives to each other, in a form of marriage, since the beginnings of recorded history, they just haven't received official sanction in most instances. As far as we know, homosexuality has always existed in a percentage of the population and continues to do so because it serves the evolutionary purpose of increasing fecundity (look it up: sexually antagonistic selection in evolution) along the maternal lines where it is seen to occur. So much for your not being natural "theory". As for the definition of disability, it clearly applies to yourself far more than any of us, as you've demonstrated all too clearly that you are substantially limited in the major life activity of carrying on an intelligent discussion.
|
|
“Friend of Dorothy”
Since: Nov 07
Salina, Kansas
ISP:
Salina, KS
|
Bottle Top wrote: <quoted text>
No there's not. Pride is a product of having accomplished something. I'm sorry you feel that way, but there's no need for you to make your hang ups ours. Pride is the antithesis of shame and those of us who are LGBT will no longer live with the shame that people like you want us to feel for simply being created the way we were. There isn't a damn thing wrong with having been born Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual or transgendered other than what your tightly wound sort want us to believe and Pride Parades are just a way of letting off the aggravation of having to put up with you for the other 364 days a year. If you don't want to watch them don't, no one is forcing you at gun point to attend and there is no legal requirement that you search out the images on the internet that YOU CHOSE TO. We have to put up with the flagrant flaunting of heterosexuality that goes on all around us and you don't hear us whining that our poor virgin eyes have been offended, man up and stop making your obviously psychological issues our problem...
|
|
“In Search of Truthiness”
Since: Dec 08
Allentown
ISP:
Verona, NJ
|
Bottle Top wrote: <quoted text>
Try kissing my ass on that response. If you flaming queers wouldn't have the need to take over a section of the cities you reside in only to stop the flow of traffic for a day at a time because of your inherent need to show us your pink nipple clips you're so proud of we wouldn't be forced to see these ludicrous disokays of flesh and attitude. LOL!!!
I got stuck in a San Francisco parade a number of years ago which cost me a business deal since I couldn't get through that lineup of freaks for almost 3 hours. If you have this absolute need to push your ass cheeks to the sun I suggest you find a rural setting in which everything from old ladies to little kiddies won't have to be subjected to your unwelcomed display. First off, darlin', I am not a "flaming queen". I am just a straight, happily married woman who has enough compassion and brain cells to believe that everyone, regardless of sexual orientation, has the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Oh, and if you couldn't close a business deal because of a traffic jam, that was not the "flaming queens" fault, that was due to either your lack of sales skills or your product. Or maybe lack of planning - seriously, what business person worth his salt doesn't plan for serious traffic snarls when there is a GAY PRIDE EVENT in SAN FRANSICO? Stop blaming your lack of happiness and success on other people. I think the reason why you have gone to such pains to find photos of the most flamboyant members of the gay community is because you actually LOVE to look at them. Admit it, the idea of a big, beefy man in an neon green banana hammock. Or maybe you are angry because the average drag queen is more woman than you'll ever have and more man then you'll ever be.
|
Since: Jul 07
Batavia, OH
|
Bottle Top wrote: <quoted text> Hey Einstein.....'heterosexuals' don't constitute a 'community'. We share this big space we call earth friend. The sense of delegating community between heterosexuals and homosexuals is a clear sense of division of which angry flamers such as yourself propogate. One element of sharing a common space is that of common courtesy, politeness and being a good neighbor. The Fruiloops who participate in these gay parades have none of those qualities only a selfish need to throw their obviously vulgar behavior and manner of dress out in the public eye as an unwelcome display of weirdness. http://www.flickr.com/photos/onirei/304726241... Can't argue with facts friend. LOL! Now that does seem to be the problem that heterosexuals are having. They don't feel connected so when someone pushes off their kids on the government heterosexuals don't feel obligated to take care of things. They also lack a feeling of community so they can discuss and fix the problems with marriage. I guess you will never have a reason to have a parade. Be sure to keep working on your anger issues. I would hate to think you went to your grave by blowing a gasket.
|
|
Since: Jul 07
Batavia, OH
|
Bottle Top wrote: <quoted text>
Actually we just might adopt a child within the next two years.
And if you're still intent on claiming a disparity between the gay community and heterosexual one then may I suggest you move someplace where heterosexuals aren't forced to see Brucey tongue Larry while wearing nothing but a thong and an attitude? Good for you. You will reap the rewards one day for doing the right thing by a child (hopefully). I just hope that the child never becomes aware of your fantasies and all that anger.
|
|
|
Since: Mar 08
Austin, TX
|
Tonya wrote: Male Homosexuals and Anal Sex
I see god in my as shole in the flashbulb of orgasm.
-William Burroughs ( Naked Lunch )
Anal sex is a highly cherished activity of homosexual men. Before engaging in anal sex, homosexuals often like to prepare the anus for penile penetration, usually by lubing it with saliva. The act of stimulating the perianal region with one?s tongue is referred to as rimming by homosexuals. Some homosexuals don?t mind coming in contact with feces; others do. For the latter, anal cleanliness and smell is important. Some homosexuals put perfume on their anus to make it smell better, but the alcohol may sting. Others try massage-oils, but such oils can taste bad, weaken condoms, or even irritate the anus. Goldstone suggests honey or jam on the anus for an agreeable taste.(1)
Sometimes, attempts to maintain anal cleanliness may be deleterious for homosexuals. Goldstone described a homosexual patient who complained of pain and bleeding with his bowel movements. The patient had deep cuts in the skin surrounding his anus. The patient wiped so hard with toilet paper before anal sex that he was literally wiping away his skin.(1) On the other hand, anal sex itself may lead to bleeding. Coplan et al. reported that among 2,758 men who were tested between June 1991 and December 1992 in Mexico City, bleeding during anal intercourse was a common occurrence.(2) More than one-third of the men in the study reported some bleeding, and 8% reported bleeding in half or more of their intercourse episodes. The prevalence of HIV infection was 42% in bleeders and 28% in non-bleeders All you have proven is that you enjoy copying and pasting from an anti-gay web site. Yes....homosexinfo.org is a well known anti-gay site for homophobes like you. Talk about biased. Interesting that you couldn't find a normal website to support your homophobia. Besides, it is clear that way more heterosexuals are having anal sex than gay folks. That makes you a hypocrite. Have you seen how many straight porns are dedicated to anal sex? I would imagine about half of them. Better luck next time fool.
|
|
Tonya
Macungie, PA
|
Nice diversion...I suppose since you don't approve of the website that the contents are true? HMMMMM Sick perverts. Go to an island and live your sick perverted feces loving dreams and see how long you last. It's un-natural...
fool!
|
|
Tonya
Macungie, PA
|
BTW It doesn't matter if you're a sick perverted homo or hetero, I don't approve of either so you can keep your phobias and anal loving crap to yourself. Your diversions don't work with me. :)
|
|
Since: Mar 08
Austin, TX
|
Tonya wrote: Nice diversion...I suppose since you don't approve of the website that the contents are true? HMMMMM Sick perverts. Go to an island and live your sick perverted feces loving dreams and see how long you last. It's un-natural...
fool! Thanks for confirming that your info. came from a bigoted anti-gay web site. What's wrong? You couldn't find a legitimate source to support your bigotry. I'm not suprised. Better luck next time fool.
|
|
Since: Mar 08
Austin, TX
|
Tonya wrote: BTW It doesn't matter if you're a sick perverted homo or hetero, I don't approve of either so you can keep your phobias and anal loving crap to yourself. Your diversions don't work with me.:) Good for you prude. Now go and enjoy your boring vanilla sex.
|
|
Since: Mar 08
Austin, TX
|
Tonya wrote: Nice diversion...I suppose since you don't approve of the website that the contents are true? HMMMMM Sick perverts. Go to an island and live your sick perverted feces loving dreams and see how long you last. It's un-natural...
fool! Oh, by the way. Gays aren't going anywhere. If you don't like it, then you should move to that island. Enjoy!!
|
|
Since: Jul 07
Batavia, OH
|
Bottle Top wrote: <quoted text>
Buddy....I'm laughing so hard it feels like 3 ribs on my right side are busted....LOL!!!
And WTF are you talking about???
. I realize that you probably have few friends but I'm not your buddy. Try and find someone that you can actually see to be your buddy. I'm glad you are laughing....you might call it a mutual laugh fest. Your attempt at humor is a bit immature and lacking any originality but old jokes, such as your posts, can be amusing at times.
|
|
“Friend of Dorothy”
Since: Nov 07
Salina, Kansas
ISP:
Salina, KS
|
Bottle Top wrote: <quoted text>
Harry in Ohio, Frank in Nevada, Bob in Botswana, Richard in Kansas or whatever your monker reads listen to this; I've heard from your sort more often than I really care to and it's high time you listen up, you seriously need to stop trying to make your hang ups and problems ours. No one has forced you to do jack and your personal collection of "tons of pictures" from Gay Pride Parades which you "claim" to be offended by, only makes me think that the lady doth protest far too much for your own good. I really don't give a flying fig if you're offended and in many ways I'm glad you are. People like you deserve to be offended at every possible opportunity until you come to grips with your problem and learn to get over yourself. You're done here, go crawl back into your closet with your picture collection...
|
|
Since: Jul 07
Batavia, OH
|
Bottle Top wrote: <quoted text>
Yeah. It's sad. Had my birthday party a few weeks ago in which I ordered 1 clown, 3 strippers and invited everyone from the checkout clerk at the supermarket to the kid who throws my daily paper to the porch only to have the clown do a drive by and keep going, the strippers all wanting an additional $100 each if they were required to enter and me having to stop by the dog pound and put a pointy topped birthday cap and lei on an unwilling mutt so I had at least someone to share the experience. That's pretty much how I pictured your life. I hate to break this to you but I've spent about the all the time with you that I can stomach for now. So have a good day. Please...don't do the same thing you've done in the past and assume I left the board...I'm just ignoring you. You responding to this post screams out for more attention. You won't get it for now.
|
|
csw
Berwick, PA
|
Bottle Top wrote: <quoted text>
Try kissing my ass on that response. If you flaming queers wouldn't have the need to take over a section of the cities you reside in only to stop the flow of traffic for a day at a time because of your inherent need to show us your pink nipple clips you're so proud of we wouldn't be forced to see these ludicrous disokays of flesh and attitude. LOL!!!
I got stuck in a San Francisco parade a number of years ago which cost me a business deal since I couldn't get through that lineup of freaks for almost 3 hours. If you have this absolute need to push your ass cheeks to the sun I suggest you find a rural setting in which everything from old ladies to little kiddies won't have to be subjected to your unwelcomed display. Seems to me that a smart and savy businessman would have checked for possible disruptions in traffic prior to driving to a meeting to avoid any delays. Chances are the parade was not a spontaneous event and would have been publized in newspapers and with the Dept of Transportation in the particular city.
|
|
Since: Mar 08
Austin, TX
|
Bottle Top wrote: <quoted text> We just don't want to see this: http://www.flickr.com/photos/snooker68/263863... Can you handle that sunshine? That looks pretty tame compared with Mardi Gras in New Orleans. Or how about sping break at Lake Havasu? Or how about the annual biker rally in Sturgis? It seems you want one set of rules for straights and another one for gays. I have only been to one gay pride event in my life and it was here in Austin, Texas. It was very much a family oriented event and nothing like the gay pride picture you posted from Berlin. http://rides.webshots.com/photo/1426783987034... http://rides.webshots.com/photo/1426783707034... P.S.- I have many more pics if you would like to see them. Most are pornographic and probably would be deleted from this web site.
|
|
“Dirk Duncum”
Since: Feb 07
bethlehem
ISP:
New Holland, PA
|
The whole thing is unnecessary. There is no need for these Gay Parades or Rallies. Government funds should not be used at all for these events. I personally do not care about your orientation. Except for trans genders. I find them to be revolting. But, regular Gay/bi men and women I have no issues with.
|
|
|
2,018
Judge it!
Search the Allentown Forum:
Taurus
